Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2022
Edited by Jorrig Vogels and Sterre Leufkens
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 39] 2022
► pp. 143–157

A table named James or a table named Maya?

The influence of grammatical gender on the perception of objects in German and Polish

| Leiden University
| Leiden University
| Leiden University
| Leiden University
In French, the noun apple (la pomme) is grammatically feminine, in German (der Apfel) it is masculine. Does this entail that French speakers perceive apples to be feminine whereas German speakers attribute masculine characteristics to them? Various studies suggest that grammatical gender does indeed influence object perception (Haertlé 2017; Boroditsky & Schmidt 2000), although findings are not always replicated (Bender et al. 2011). The current study investigates this phenomenon for Polish, an understudied language in this domain, and German, a language for which contradictory results have been obtained. We investigated whether Polish (N = 21) and German (N = 27) speakers follow the grammatical gender of an object when providing a first name for it (e.g. James or Maya). Results suggest that while Polish speakers provided names that were in accordance with the object’s grammatical gender, German speakers did not. Cross-linguistic differences between these two languages (regarding noun transparency) may explain these findings.
Keywords: language-cognition interface, cross-linguistic differences, grammatical gender, object perception
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Cross-linguistic differences in grammatical gender
    • 1.2Current knowledge regarding the impact of grammatical gender on cognition
    • 1.3The current study
    • 1.4Predictions
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Design and materials
    • 2.3Experimental procedure
    • 2.4Scoring procedure
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Descriptive statistics
    • 3.2Inferential statistics
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Interpretation
    • 4.2Limitations and suggestions for future research
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 4 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00066.kur
References (12)
References
Bender, Andreas, Sieghard Beller & Karl C. Klauer. 2011. “Grammatical gender in German: A case for linguistic relativity?” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (9): 1821–1835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera & Lauren A. Schmidt. 2000. “Sex, syntax, and semantics.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 221: 1–6. [URL]
Clarke, Mark, Ann Losoff, Margaret Dickenson McCracken & JoAnn Still. 1981. “Gender perception in Arabic and English.” Language Learning, 31 (1): 159–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fausey, Caitlin M. & Lera Boroditsky. 2011. “Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18 (1): 150–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haertlé, Izabella. 2017. “Does grammatical gender influence perception? A study of Polish and French speakers.” Psychology of Language and Communication, 21 (1): 386–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohlfeld, Anette. 2006. “Accessing grammatical gender in German: The impact of gender-marking regularities.” Applied Psycholinguistics 27 (2): 127–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loftus, Elizabeth F. & John C. Palmer. 1974. “Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13 (5): 585–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maciuszek, Józef, Mateusz Polak & Natalia Świa̧tkowska. 2019. “Grammatical gender influences semantic categorization and implicit cognition in Polish.” Frontiers in Psychology 101: 2208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sera, Maria D., Christian A. H. Berge & Javier del Castillo Pintado. 1994. “Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers.” Cognitive Development, 9 (3): 261–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sera, Maria D., Chyle Elieff, James Forbes, Melissa Clarke Burch, Wanda Rodríguez & Diane Poulin Dubois. 2002. “When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 131 (3): 377–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vuksanović, Jasmina, Jovana Bjekić & Natalija Radivojević. 2015. “Grammatical gender and mental representation of object: The case of musical instruments.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44 (4): 383–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L. 1956. Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar