Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2022
Edited by Jorrig Vogels and Sterre Leufkens
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 39] 2022
► pp. 192208
References (20)
References
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts. 2014. “Advances in weak referentiality.” Weak Referentiality ed. by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts. 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Audring, Jenny. 2020a. “Possessive pronouns”. Taalportaal, 14 May 2020, [URL]
. 2020b. “Articles”. Taalportaal, 14 May 2020, [URL]
Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver. 2020. “Topic drop”. Taalportaal, 14 May 2020, [URL]
Broekhuis, Hans & Marcel den Dikken. 2020. “The definite article in inalienable possession constructions”. Taalportaal, 14 May 2020, [URL]
Ciot, Morgane, Morgan Sonderegger & Derek Ruths. 2013. “Gender Inference of Twitter Users in Non-English Contexts.” Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 1136–1145.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen, Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm. 2001. “Kinship in grammar”. Dimensions of Possession ed. by Irène Baron, Michael Herslund and Finn Sørensen. 201–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten van den Toorn. 2019. “Het bezittelijk voornaamwoord (possessief pronomen).” Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, January 2019, [URL]
Hunt, Matthew & Eric K. Action. 2022. “‘How’s the wife?’: Pragmatic reasoning in spousal reference”. Journal of Pragmatics 1881: 152–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Bruyn, Bert. 2014. Inalienable possession. The semantics of the definite article. Weak referentiality, ed. by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts. 311–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee-Schoenfeld, Vera. 2016. The syntax of external and internal possessor variation in German inalienable possession. STUF 69(1), 113–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leufkens, Sterre & Marten van der Meulen. 2018. “De kleuter en de peuter – nog meer afstandelijkheid in relaties”. De Taalpassie van Milfje, 23 August 2018, [URL]
McConvell, Patrick. 2013. “Introduction. Kinship Change in Anthropology and Linguistics.” Kinship systems. Change and reconstruction ed. by Patrick McConvell, Ian Keen and Rachel Hendery. 1–18. Utah: The University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L. & Immanuel Barshi. 1999. “External Possession: What, Where, How, and Why”. External Possession ed. by Doris L. Payne and Immanuel Barshi. 3–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Read, Dwight. 2013. “A New Approach to Forming a Typology of Kinship Terminology Systems: From Morgan and Murdock to the Present.” Structure and Dynamics 6(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scholten, Jolien. 2018. “The ins and outs of external possession: A micro-comparative perspective”. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
Statista. 2022. “Twitter: Distribution of global audiences 2021, by gender.” Accessed 1 February 2022. [URL]
Van der Meulen, Marten & Sterre Leufkens. 2018. “De vriend en ik”. De Taalpassie van Milfje, 16 August 2018, [URL]
Van Veen, Piet. 1929. Fouten: oorspronkelijke roman. Amsterdam: Nederlandsche Uitgevers-maatschap. [URL]
Zamal, Faiyaz A., Wendy Liu & Derek Ruths. 2012. “Homophily and Latent Attribute Inference: Inferring Latent Attributes of Twitter Users from Neighbors.” Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 6(1): 387–390.Google Scholar