Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2023
Edited by Sterre Leufkens and Marco Bril
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 40] 2023
► pp. 39–54

Hyperdialectisms revisited

 | Tilburg University | Meertens Institute
 | Tilburg University | Meertens Institute
Ongoing processes of dialect leveling and loss have given rise to the widespread use of the concept of hyperdialectism in sociolinguistic research. Hyperdialectisms are considered to be a reaction to dialect loss: a typical dialect feature that is distinctive from the standard language or a neighboring dialect is overgeneralized. However, there is pitfall in using the concept as an umbrella term for all deviating dialect forms. In this paper, we aim to provide a revisited view of hyperdialectisms based on written dialect sources. In doing so, we use hyperdialectal adnominal gender marking in southern Dutch Brabantish dialects as a case study. We show that unexpected forms were already present in early twentieth-century dialect use, despite dialect grammar descriptions from the second half of the century often being used as a point of reference for ‘correct’ grammar. Furthermore, we argue that the concept of hyperdialectism requires careful layering in sociolinguistic analysis.
Keywords: hyperdialectism, dialect change, North Brabant, adnominal gender marking, sociolinguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The gender suffix in the North Brabantish dialects
  • 3.Characterizing hyperdialectisms
    • 3.1Hyperdialectisms in early twentieth-century written dialect
    • 3.2Unraveling the difficulties of hyperdialectism as an analytical tool
  • 4.Towards a revisited view of hyperdialectism
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 3 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00078.dor
References (32)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2010. “Localising the global on the participatory web.” Handbook of Language and Globalization ed. by Nikolas Coupland, 203–231. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill. 2005. Dialect Change. Convergence and Divergence in European Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloemhoff, Henk & Nanne Streekstra. 2013. Basisboek historische taalkunde. Groningen: Uitgeverij kleine Uil.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2013. “Writing as a sociolinguistic object.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(4): 440–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. 2009. “One foot in the grave? Dialect death, dialect contact, and dialect birth in England.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 196/1971: 121–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bont, Antonius Petrus. 1962. Dialect van Kempenland; meer in het bijzonder D’Oerse taol. Deel I: Klank- en vormleer en enige syntaktische bijzonderheden. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
De Schutter, Georges. 2013. “The dialects of Brabant: Grammatical properties.” Language and Space, Vol. 3: Dutch ed. by Frans Hinskens & Johan Taeldeman, 297–318. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Tier, Veronique, Ton van de Wijngaard & Anne-Sophie Ghyselen. 2017. Taalvariatie en sociale media. Leiden: Stichting Nederlandse Dialecten.Google Scholar
Dietz, Feike, Marjo van Koppen, Cora van de Poppe, Marijn Schraagen & Joanna Wall. 2022. “Cross-disciplinary approaches to linguistic variation in Early Modern West Germanic.” Journal of Historical Syntax 6(13–18): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doreleijers, Kristel. 2022. “Bepaalt de NORM wel de norm?” Het dialectendoeboek: De schatkamer van 90 jaar Meertens Instituut ed. by Marc van Oostendorp & Simone Wolff, 58–61. Gorredijk: Sterck en De Vreese.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. “Enregistering grammatical gender. Indexing Brabantishness through languagecultural practices in digital tiles.” Signs and Society. DOI logo
Doreleijers, Kristel, Marjo van Koppen & Jos Swanenberg. 2020. “De dynamiek van geslachtsmarkering in de Noord-Brabantse dialecten.” Taal & Tongval 72(1): 69–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doreleijers, Kristel, Joske Piepers, Ad Backus & Jos Swanenberg. 2021. “Language Variation in Dialect-standard Contact Situations: Two Cases from Brabantish and Limburgish Dialects in the Netherlands.” Cognitive Sociolinguistics Revisited ed. by Gitte Kristiansen, Karlien Franco, Stefano De Pascale, Laura Rosseel & Weiwei Zhang, 175–185. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinskens, Frans. 2014. “Despite or because of intensive contact? Internal, external and extralinguistic aspects of divergence in modern dialects and ethnolects of Dutch.” Stability and Divergence in Language Contact: Factors and Mechanisms ed. by Kurt Braunmüller, Steffen Höder & Karoline Kühl, 109–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoppenbrouwers, Cor. 1983. “Het genus in een Brabants regiolect.” Tabu 131: 1–25.Google Scholar
. 1990. Het regiolect: van dialect tot Algemeen Nederlands. Muiderberg: Coutinho.Google Scholar
. 1996. De taal van Kempenland: van ààwbätte tot zwiemele. Eindhoven: Kempen Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Lenz, Alexandra. 2004. “Hyperforms and Variety Barriers”. Language variation in Europe ed. by Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, 281–293. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Lillis, Theresa. 2013. Sociolinguistics of writing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Røyneland, Unn. 2009. “Dialects in Norway: catching up with the rest of Europe?” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 196/1971: 7–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroop, Jan. 1989. “Woordgeslacht (‘genus’).” De Vierschaer 71: 4–15.Google Scholar
Swanenberg, Jos. 2014. Het nieuwste Brabants. Taalgebruik van jonge en nieuwe Brabanders.” Het Nieuwste Brabant ed. by Wim van de Donk, 425–444. Eindhoven: Uitgeverij Lecturis.Google Scholar
. 2017. Brabants dialect op Facebook en Twitter. Taalvariatie en sociale media ed. by Veronique De Tier, Ton van de Wijngaard & Anne-Sophie Ghyselen, 25–32. Stichting Nederlandse Dialecten.Google Scholar
. 2020. “Does dialect loss give more or less variation? On dialect leveling and language creativity.” Proceedings of Methods XVI. Papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology ed. by Yoshiyuki Asahi, 65–74. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Swanenberg, Jos & Roeland van Hout. 2013. “Recent developments in the mid southern dialects.” Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume 3: Dutch ed. by Frans Hinskens & Johan Taeldeman, 319–335. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taeldeman, Johan. 1980. Inflectional aspects of adjectives in the dialects of Dutch-speaking Belgium. Studies in Dutch Phonology ed. by Wim Zonneveld, Frans van Coetsem & Orrin W. Robinson, 223–246. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1988. “On the role of dialect contact and interdialect in linguistic change.” Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social 11: 547–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandekerckhove, Reinhild. 2013. “Southwestern Dutch dialects today.” Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume 3: Dutch ed. by Frans Hinskens & Johan Taeldeman, 194–211. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Horst, Joop. 2008. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse Syntaxis 2. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
van Spijk, Yoïn & Jos Swanenberg. 2018. “Dialect en standaardtaal in contact: de vele vormen van het dialect in de Langstraat.” Taal & Tongval 70(1): 115–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Puck, Jacomine Nortier & Jos Swanenberg. 2015. “Dialect als stereotypering. Regionale identiteit in Noord-Brabant verbeeld en verwoord op Facebook.” Artikelen van de 8e Anéla Conferentie, ed. by Marianne Boogaard, Beppie van de Bogaerde, Sylvia Bacchini, Maja Curcic, Nivja de Jong, Emmanuelle le Pichon & Laurent Rasier, 111–125. Utrecht: Uitgeverij Eburon.Google Scholar
Weijnen, Antonius Angelus. 1971. Schets van de geschiedenis van de Nederlandse Syntaxis. Assen: Koninklijke Drukkerij Van Gorcum & Comp.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Doreleijers, Kristel & Stefan Grondelaers
2024. Between (anti-)grammar and identity: a quantitative and qualitative study of hyperdialectisms in Brabantish. Linguistics DOI logo
Doreleijers, Kristel & Jos Swanenberg
2024. Non-conforming dialect and its (social) meanings: younger and older speakers’ reactions to hyperdialectisms in Brabantish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 47:3 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.