Hyperdialectisms revisited
Ongoing processes of dialect leveling and loss have given rise to the widespread use of the concept of
hyperdialectism in sociolinguistic research. Hyperdialectisms are considered to be a reaction to dialect loss: a typical dialect
feature that is distinctive from the standard language or a neighboring dialect is overgeneralized. However, there is pitfall in
using the concept as an umbrella term for all deviating dialect forms. In this paper, we aim to provide a revisited view of
hyperdialectisms based on written dialect sources. In doing so, we use hyperdialectal adnominal gender marking in southern Dutch
Brabantish dialects as a case study. We show that unexpected forms were already present in early twentieth-century dialect use,
despite dialect grammar descriptions from the second half of the century often being used as a point of reference for ‘correct’
grammar. Furthermore, we argue that the concept of hyperdialectism requires careful layering in sociolinguistic analysis.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The gender suffix in the North Brabantish dialects
- 3.Characterizing hyperdialectisms
- 3.1Hyperdialectisms in early twentieth-century written dialect
- 3.2Unraveling the difficulties of hyperdialectism as an analytical tool
- 4.Towards a revisited view of hyperdialectism
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References