Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2023
Edited by Sterre Leufkens and Marco Bril
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 40] 2023
► pp. 6987
Bošković, Z.
2005 “On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP”. Studia Linguistica 59(1): 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, R. H. B.
2022 “ordinal – Regression Models for Ordinal Data.” R package version 2022.11–16. [URL]
Corver, Norbert, Marjo van Koppen, H. Kranendonk & M. Rigterink
2011Database Diversity in Dutch DP Design (DDiDD). Utrecht, UiL-OTS. URL: [URL]
Devine, A. & Stephens, L.
2000Discontinuous syntax: hyperbaton in Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doreleijers, Kristel, Marjo van Koppen & Jos Swanenberg
2021 “De dynamiek van geslachtsmarkering in de Noord-Brabantse dialecten”. Taal en Tongval 72(1): 69–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, G.
1988 “Aufspaltung von NPn un das Problem der ‘freien’ Wortstellung”. Linguistische Berichte 1141: 91–113.Google Scholar
Fanselow, G. & D. Ćavar
2002 “Distributed deletion”. In Theoretical approaches to universals, Volume 94 of Linguistik Aktuell, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, 65–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, G. & C. Féry, C.
2006 “Prosodic and Morphosyntactic Aspects of Discontinuous Noun Phrases: a Comparative Perspective”. Ms., Universität Potsdam.Google Scholar
Giusti, G. & R. Iovino
2016 “Latin as a split-DP language”. Studia Linguistica 10(3): 221–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Junghanns, U.
2021Split noun phrases in Slavic Languages [Handout].Google Scholar
Lühr, R.
2016 “Discontinuous Syntax: Hyperbaton in Older Indo-European Languages”. In Anatolica et Indogermanica, ed. by H. Marquardt, S. Reichmuth & J. Trabazo, 153–166. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Mensching, G.
2020 “On “partitive dislocation” in Sardinian: A Romance and Minimalist perspective”. Linguistics 58(3): 805–835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, K.
2005 “Semantic properties of split topicalization in German”. In Event arguments: foundations and applications, volume 501 of Linguistische Arbeiten ed. by C. Maienborn, A. Wöllstein, 331–356. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Formal properties of measurement constructions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolae, A.
2020 “Discontinuous nominal constituents in Old Romanian: empirical analysis and theoretical relevance” [Handout]. Anglia Ruskin – Cambridge Romance Linguistics Seminars February 13th, 2020.Google Scholar
Nolda, A.
2007Die Thema-Integration. Syntax and Semantik der ‘gespaltenen Topikalisierung’ im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Ott, D.
2011 “Local Instability”. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.
Puig-Waldmüller, E.
2006 “Wörter stehen da einige. On nominal split topicalization in non-standard Viennese German”. Master’s thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
R Core Team
2018R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Roehrs, D.
2009 “Split NPs”. Ms., University of North Texas.Google Scholar
Swanenberg, Jos
2013 “All dialects are equal, but some dialects are more equal than others”. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, paper 43.Google Scholar
Tappe, H.
1989 “A note on split topicalization in German”. In Syntactic phrase-structure phenomena in noun phrases and sentences, Volume 6 of Linguistik Aktuell, ed. by C. Bhatt, E. Löbel & C. Schmidt, 159–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Hoof, H.
1997 “Left Dislocation and Split Topics in Brabant Dutch”. In Materials on Left Dislocation ed. by E. Anagnostopoulou, H. van Riemsdijk, F. Zwarts, 275–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Split topicalization”. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume I1, ed. by M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk, 408–462. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, Henk
1989 “Movement and regeneration”. In Dialect variation and the theory of grammar, ed. by P. Benincà, 105–136. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar