Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 64:3 (2018) ► pp.382–404

Fashion language and translatology

 | University of Montenegro
My study is based on art exhibitions, fashion shows, photo books, movies, magazines, advertisements, blogs, scientific papers and interviews, and fashion vocabulary. Philology literally means love for the word. It is the love for the word that unites philologists with translators, researchers, scientists, and fashion specialists.
The translatological analysis of this specialist language is a reduced selection of 200 idioms, illustrative examples from English, Montenegrin or Serbian, and Italian. Also, habitual fashion collocations constitute a significant part of the translatological analysis. I have completed my analysis with contemporary terminology of fashion clothing terms and words in English and their equivalents in Italian, almost 150 of them, compiled in a small glossary. This small glossary will be of great help to fashion and clothing industry professionals.
Through their level of engagement, public figures from the world of art, music, fashion and politics, as well-known officials, actors or celebrities, have become the new trend-setters in all societies and also dictators of fashion, because they set the trends and fashion standards which others follow.
Keywords: fashion language, ESP, fashion idioms, small fashion glossary, translatological analysis, culture
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Fashion language: Terminology and glossary
  • 3.Fashion anglicisms are “in”
  • 4.Habitual clothes idioms
  • 5.Habitual collocations with the noun fashion
  • 6.Instead of a conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00040.boj
References (18)
References
Barthes, Roland. 2005. The Language of Fashion. Bloomsbury. [URL]
Bojović, Brankica. 2010. Leksika u kriminološkom registru. Podgorica: Obodsko slovo; Beograd: Štampar Makarije.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Pictorial Language in the Landscape of Semantics”. [URL]
. 2015. Basics of Translatology. Niksic: University of Montenegro, Faculty of Philology.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1997. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dumas, Frédéric. 2009. “Divided Inner Selves? Americanness and Americanization in Richard Ford’s Dominion”. In Language, Literature, Culture, Identity, 26–38. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philology.Google Scholar
Filipović, Rudolf. 1986. Teorija jezika u kontaktu-uvod u lingvistiku jezičnih dodira. Zagreb: JAZU.Google Scholar
Graddol, David. 1997. The Future of English. United Kingdom: The British Council.Google Scholar
Hollander, Anne. 1993. Seeing through Clothes (Reprint edition). Berkeley – Los Angeles CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Klajn, Ivan; and Samardzic, Mila. 2012. Italian equivalents. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philology.Google Scholar
Knapp, Karlfried. 2002. “The fading out of the non-native speaker. Native speaker dominance in lingua franca situations”. In Lingua franca communications, ed. by Knapp, Karlfried; and Christiane Meierkord (eds), 269–302. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lagerfeld, Karl. 2013. [URL]
Muggleton, David. 2000. Inside Subculture: The Postmodern Meaning of Style. Oxford NY: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Prćić, Tvrtko. 1997. Semantika i pragmatika reči. Sremski Karlovci. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.Google Scholar
Svensen, Laš Fr. H. (Svendsen, Lars Fr. H.). 2005. Filozofija mode, transl. from Norwegian by Ivan Rajić. Belgrade: Geopoetika.Google Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary. 2006. The Turns of Translation Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šipka, Danilo. 1998. Osnovi leksikologije i srodnih disciplina. Novi Sad: Matica Srpska.Google Scholar
Titone, Debra A.; and Cynthia. M. Connine. 1994. “Descriptive Norms for 171 Idiomatic Expressions: Familiarity, Compositionality, Predictability, and Literality”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9 (4): 247–270. [URL] DOI logo