Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 68:3 (2022) ► pp.317–340

Translating the sacred

Agency in translating verb-noun alternation in the Qur’an

| Sultan Qaboos University
| Qatar University
One of the contentious issues in religious translation since the legendary St. Jerome is the degree of the translator’s agency. The point of contention has been whether the translator can exercise agency and freedom in translating sacred texts or they should strictly adhere to the form and attend to what St. Jerome called the “mysterious syntax” of the sacred text. Using a stylistic approach (Abdul-Raof 2001 and 2006; Abdel Haleem 1992), we address the issue of the translator’s agency in religious translation by examining the translations of a unique rhetorical feature, namely the verb-noun alternation, by seven key translators in Verses 59, 64, 69 and 72 of Chapter 56, Al-Wāqi‘ah. Despite the general assumption that religious translation is highly constrained and that the translators of this type of text have little freedom, the findings of this paper show that religious translators, in fact, do exercise agency in their translation, whether in the form of adapting the source text to the target text readers or in the form of reproducing the grammatical patterning of the source text for cultural or ideological reasons.
Keywords: translator’s agency, Qur’anic inimitability, eloquence, Arabic rhetoric, Arabic stylistics, religious translation, Iltifāt
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Inimitability of the Qur’an
  • Stylistic inimitability
  • Verses under study
  • Translating the sacred
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 24 May 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00273.sha
References (50)
References
Abbas, Faḍl and Sanā Abbas. 1991. I‘jāz al-Qur’ān al-Karīm [The inimitability of the Holy Qur’an]. Beruit: Dār al-Nafā’is.Google Scholar
Abdel Haleem, Muhammad. 1992. “Grammatical Shift for Rhetorical Purposes: Iltifāt and Related Features in the Qur’ān.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 551: 407–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abdul-Raof, Hussein. 2006. Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Qur’an Translation: Discourse, Texture and Exegesis. London and New York: Routledge. 197.Google Scholar
Abū Mūsā, Muḥammad. 1996. Khaṣā’iṣ al Tarākīb [Characteristics of structures]. Cairo: Wahba LibraryGoogle Scholar
Al-Abdullatif, Mohammed. 2018. “The Qur’an’s Translatability, the Translator’s Invisibility.” Babel 46 (2): 205–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-‘Alawī, Yaḥyā. 1914. Kitāb al-Ṭirāz al-Mutaḍammin li Asrār al-Balāghah wa ‘Ulūm Ḥaqā’iq al I‘jāz, [The book of Tirāz on the secrets of eloquence and the sciences of I‘jāz], 31 vols. Cairo: Dār al-kutub al-khudaywiyyah.Google Scholar
Al-Amri, Waleed B. 2007. “Qur’an Translatability at the Phonic Level.” Perspectives 15 (3): 159–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Ja‘īd, Ibrahīm. 1999. “Khaṣā’is Binā’ al-Jumla al Qur’ānīyya Wa Dilālātuha al-Balāghīyyah Fī Tafsīr al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr” [Features of the Qur’anic sentence structure and its rhetorical significance in Ibn ‘Āshūr’s Tafsīr Al-Taḥrīr and Al-Tanwīr] Ph.D. diss., Umm Al Qura University, Saudi Arabia.
Al-Jurjānī, ‘Abdul Qāhir. 1984a. Dalā’il al-I‘jāz [Signs of inimitability], corrected and annotated by Mahmūd Shākir. Cairo: Al-Khanji Library.Google Scholar
. 1984b. Asrār al-Balāghah [Secrets of eloquence], corrected and annotated by Mahmūd Shākir. Cairo: Al-Khanijī Library.Google Scholar
Al-Marāghī, Muḥammad. 1936. Baḥth Fī Tarjamat al-Qur’ān al-Karīm Wa Aḥkāmuhā [On the translation of the Noble Qur’an]. Cairo: Raghā’ib Publishing.Google Scholar
Al-Nadawī, ‘Abd Allāh. 1997. Tarjmat Ma‘āni al-Qur’ān al-Karīm Wa Taṭawwur Fahmihī ‘Ind al-Gharb [Translations of the Holy Qur’an and the development of its understanding in the West]. Mecca: Rābiṭat al-’Ālam al- Islāmī.Google Scholar
Al-Rafi‘ī, Musṭafā. 1973. I‘jāz al-Qur’ān Wa al-Balāghah al Nabawīyyah [The inimitability of the Qur’an and the eloquence of the Prophet]. Beirut: Dar Al Kitāb al ʕarabi. 350.Google Scholar
Al-Sakkāki, Ya‘qūb. 1937. Miftāḥ al-‘Ulūm [The key of sciences]. Cairo: Maṭba’at Musṭafā al-Bābi al-Ḥalabī.Google Scholar
Al-Shāṭibī, Abū Isḥāq. 2004. Al-Muwāfaqāt Fī Uṣūl al-Sharī‘ah [Agreements in the fundamentals of religion]. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al- ‘Ilmīyyah.Google Scholar
Baker, Mona. 2006. Translation and Conflict. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basalamah, Salah, and Gaafar Sadek. 2020. “Debates around the Translation of the Qur’an: Between Jurisprudence and Translation Studies.” In The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Translation, edited by Sameh Hanna, Hanem El-Farahaty, and Abdel-Wahab Khalifa, 9–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bassnnet, Susan. 2002. Translation Studies, 3rd ed, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Water. 2012. “The Translator’s Task,” translated by Steven Rendall. In The Translation Studies Reader, 3rd ed, edited by Lawrence Venuti, 75–83. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutt, Ernst. (2000) 2010. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hassen, Rim. 2017. “Negotiating Western and Muslim Identities through Translation: Western Female Converts Translating the Qur’an.” In Translating Women: Different Voices and New Horizons, edited by Louis von Flotow and Farzaneh Farahzad, 17–38. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ibn Al Athīr, Nasr Allāh. 1956. Al Jāmi’ al Kabīr fī Ṣinā’at al Manẓūm min al Kalām wa al-Manthūr [The big anthology in the art of poetry and prose]. Baghdad: Maṭba’at al majma’ al ‘ilmi.Google Scholar
Israel, Hephzibah. 2019. “Translation and Religion: Crafting Regimes of Identity.” Religion 49 (3): 323–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1959. “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” In On Translation, edited by Reuben Brower, 222–239. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Khalafallāh, Aḥmad, and Zaghlūl Salām, eds. 1976. Thalātha Rasā’il Fī I‘Jāz al-Qur’ān Li Rummānī Wa al-Khaṭṭābī Wa ‘Abdul Qāhir al Jurjānī [Three treatises in Qur’an inimitability by Al-Rummāni, Al-Khaṭābi and Abdul Qāhir Al-Jurjāni]. Cairo: Dār al-Adab.Google Scholar
Leaman, Oliver, ed. 2006. The Qur’an: An Encyclopedia. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefevere, André. 1992. Translation/History/Culture: A Sourcebook. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lumbard, Joseph. 2015. “The Qur’an in Translation.” In The Study Qur’an: A New Translation and Commentary, edited by Seyyed Hossein Nasr. New York: Harper One.Google Scholar
Maṭlūb, Aḥmad. 2006. Mu’jam al-Muṣṭalaḥāt al-Balāghīyyah Wa Taṭawwuruhā [Dictionary of rhetorical terms and their development]. Baghdad: al-Dār al ‘Arabīyyah lil Mawsū’ātGoogle Scholar
Moir, Catherine. 2009. “Translational Resonance, Authenticity and Authority in the Bible and the Quran: Translation and Religious Change.” New Voices in Translation Studies 51: 29–45.Google Scholar
Muslim, Muṣṭafa. 1996. Mabāḥith Fī I‘jāz al-Qur’ān [Issues of Qur’an inimitability]. Riyadh: Dār al-Muslim.Google Scholar
Naudé, Jacobus. 2018. “History of Translation Knowledge of Monotheistic Religions with Written Tradition.” In A History of Modern Translation Knowledge, edited by Lieven D’hulst and Yves Gambier, 389–395. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nida, Eugene. 1977. “The Nature of Dynamic Equivalence in Translating.” Babel 23 (3): 99–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1964. Towards A Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nida, Eugene, and Charles Taber. 1969. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nord, Christiane. 2016. “Function + Loyalty: Theology Meets Skopos.” Open Theology 21: 566–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quṭb, Sayyid. 2004. Al-Taṣwīr Al-Fannī Fī Al-Qur’ān [Artistic visualization in the Qur’an]. Cairo, Egypt: Dār al-ShurūqGoogle Scholar
Rammuny, Raji. 1985. “Al-Jurani: A Pioneer of Grammatical and Linguistic Studies.” Historiographia Linguistica 121: 351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Katharina, and Hanz Vermeer. 2014. Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained, translated from the German by Christiane Nord. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Douglas. 2002. Western Translation Theory from Herodotus to Nietzsche. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saadat, Sabiha. 2009. “Human Embryology and the Holy Qur’an: An Overview.” International Journal of Health Sciences 3 (1): 103–109.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 2012. “On the Different Methods of Translating,” translated by Susan Bernofsky. The Translation Studies Reader, 3rd ed, edited by Lawrence Venuti, 43–63. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Dierdre Wilson. (1986) 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
The Qur’anic Arabic Corpus-Translation. [URL]
Toury, Gideon. (1995) 2012. Descriptive Translation Studies – and beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. (1995) 2008. The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation, 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vinay, Jean-Paul, and Jean Darbelnet. 1995. Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation, translated and edited by Juan C. Sager and Marie-Josée Hamel. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, Tim. 2008. The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar