Cover not available
Part of
Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research
Edited by Robert Fuchs and Valentin Werner
[Benjamins Current Topics 108] 2020
► pp. 23–52

The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English

Tracing the effects of an exposure-rich learning environment

 | University of Eastern Finland
Present-day English manifests ongoing changes in the frequency and semantic range of the progressive form, which presents a challenge for foreign language learners. This study examines the frequencies and semantic functions of the progressive in the Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage with the aim of finding out to what extent learners are adopting the ongoing changes. This study analyses the effects of an exposure-rich learning environment by comparing learners from countries where English is used in varying degrees outside formal educational contexts and by examining intra-corpus variation between learners who have vs. have not spent time in English-speaking countries. The results reveal that exposure to English in the home country explains some of the variation in the progressive frequencies, but most of all it shows in the extent to which the learners have adopted its new semantic uses. By contrast, stay in English-speaking countries was not found to be an influential variable for all learner groups.
Keywords: English progressive form, English as a foreign language (EFL), English as a second language (ESL), ESL-EFL continuum, stay abroad
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The progressive form and the ESL-EFL continuum
  • 3.Data, research questions, and methods
    • 3.1Constructing the ESL-EFL continuum
    • 3.2Research questions
    • 3.3Assessing the impact of other variables
    • 3.4Methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Variation in the frequencies of the progressive form
    • 4.2Variation in the semantic functions of the progressive form
    • 4.3Effect of stay in English-speaking countries
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.108.ijlcr.17002.mer
References (56)
References
Andersen, R. W. & Shirai, Y. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berns, M., Claes, M. -T., de Bot, K., Evers, R., Hasebrink, U., Huibregtse, I., Truchot, C., & van der Wijst, P. (2006). English in Europe. In M. Berns, K. de Bot, & U. Hasebrink (Eds.), In the presence of English: Media and European youth (pp. 15–42). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bolton, K. & Graddol, D. (2012). English in China today. English Today, 28(3), 3–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, P. (2008). The progressive aspect in World Englishes: A corpus-based study. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 225–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Cock, S. (2003). Recurrent sequences of words in native speaker and advanced learner spoken and written English. PhD thesis. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar
Deshors, S. C. (2014). A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach. English World-Wide, 35(3), 277–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Wit, A., Patard, A., & Brisard, F. (2013). A contrastive analysis of the present progressive in French and English. Studies in Language, 37(4), 846–879. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dose-Heidelmayer, S. & Götz, S. (2016). The progressive in spoken learner language: A corpus-based analysis of use and misuse. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(3), 229–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2016). English in the Netherlands. Functions, forms and attitudes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. & Laporte, S. (2015). Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes: The competing roles of norm orientation and proficiency levels. English World-Wide, 36(2), 135–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, R., Götz, S., & Werner, V. (2016). The present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and writing. In V. Werner, E. Seoane, & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), Re-assessing the present perfect (pp. 297–338). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2016). Discourse markers in L2 English: From classroom to naturalistic input. In O. Timofeeva, A. Gardner, A. Honkapohja, & S. Chevalier (Eds.), New approaches to English linguistics: Building bridges (pp. 213–249). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S., & Granger, S. (Eds.). (2010). Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage [Handbook + CD-ROM]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Granger, S. (2011). From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap (pp. 55–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F., & Paquot, M. (Eds.). (2009). International Corpus of Learner English (Version 2) [Handbook + CD-ROM]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gut, U. & Fuchs, R. (2013). Progressive aspect in Nigerian English. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(3), 243–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R., & Alho, I. (2005). Iso suomen kielioppi [The comprehensive grammar of Finnish]. Hämeenlinna: Karisto.Google Scholar
Holmes, P. & Hinchliffe, I. (2008). Swedish. A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hundt, M. (2004). Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English. English Language and Linguistics, 8(1), 47–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M. & Vogel, K. (2011). Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes: Fact or fiction? In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap (pp. 145–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, S. (2013). Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasztalska, A. (2014). English in contemporary Poland. World Englishes, 33(2), 242–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, B., Lunkenheimer, K., & Ehret, K. (Eds.). (2020). The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Zenodo. Retrieved from [URL]
Kranich, S. (2010). The progressive in Modern English. A corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laitinen, M. & Levin, M. (2016). On the globalization of English: Observations of subjective progressives in present-day Englishes. In E. Seoane & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations (pp. 229–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change in contemporary English. A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leńko-Szymańska, A. (2007). Past progressive or simple past? The acquisition of the progressive aspect by Polish Advanced learners of English. In E. Hidalgo, L. Quereda, & J. Santana (Eds.), Corpora in the foreign language classroom (pp. 253–266). Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, S., Nikula, T., & Kääntä, L. (Eds.). (2008). Kolmas kotimainen. Lähikuvia englannin käytöstä Suomessa [The third domestic language: Case studies on the use of English in Finland]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Meriläinen, L. (2010). Language transfer in the written English of Finnish students. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
(2017). The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora. World Englishes, 36(4), 760–783. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meriläinen, L., Paulasto, H., & Rautionaho, P. (2017). Extended uses of the progressive form in Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes. In M. Filppula, J. Klemola, A. Mauranen, & S. Vetchinnikova (Eds.), Changing English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 191–216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, R. & Bhatt, R. (2008). World Englishes. The study of new linguistic varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F. & Littré, D. (2013). Tracking learners’ progress: Adopting a dual ‘corpus cum experimental data’ approach. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 61–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M. (Eds.). (2011). Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes. Bridging a paradigm gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2007). The spread of the progressive and its ‘future’ use. English Language and Linguistics, 11(1), 191–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pahta, P. & Taavitsainen, I. (2011). English in intranational public discourse. In B. Kortmann & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide (pp. 605–619). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paulasto, H. (2006). Welsh English syntax. Contact and variation. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
(2014). Extended uses of the progressive form in L1 and L2 Englishes. English World-Wide, 35(3), 247–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Rautionaho, P. (2014). Variation in the progressive. A corpus-based study into World Englishes. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Rogatcheva, S. (2014). Aspect in learner writing: A corpus-based comparison of advanced Bulgarian and German learners’ written English. PhD thesis. Giessen: University of Giessen.Google Scholar
Rohde, A. (2009). Input frequency and the acquisition of the progressive. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 29–46). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. (2014). New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of world Englishes. World Englishes, 33(1), 9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith Tools (Version 5) [Computer software]. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Seargeant, P. (2009). The idea of English in Japan. Ideology and the evolution of a global language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, D. (2009). Typological diversity in New Englishes. English World-Wide, 30(2), 170–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, E. (2005). The progressive in 19th-century English. A process of integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, B. (2014). Progressive aspect and stative verbs in Outer Circle varieties. World Englishes, 33(2), 157–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergren Axelsson, M. & Hahn, A. (2001). The use of the progressive in Swedish and German advanced learner English: A corpus-based study. ICAME Journal, 25, 5–30.Google Scholar