Part of
Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic UnitsEdited by Tsuyoshi Ono, Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki
[Benjamins Current Topics 114] 2021
► pp. 59–86
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono, Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki
[Benjamins Current Topics 114] 2021
► pp. 59–86
Free NPs as units in Finnish
This article focuses on free NPs, i.e. noun phrases that are grammatically not part of any clause but form units of their own. Using the methodology of discourse-functional and interactional linguistics, I analyze the morphosyntactic, prosodic and interactional features of free NPs in conversational Finnish. With its rich morphological marking, Finnish provides an interesting perspective on free NPs: Morphosyntactic features, together with semantics, are crucial in determining the status of an NP as a clausal constituent or a free NP. The prosodic analysis shows that the majority of free NPs show clear prosodic boundaries, signalled for example by speaker change, coherent intonation contour, pause or pitch reset. Free NPs serve various interactional functions, such as making assessments or disambiguating referents. These are functions which operate on something already established in the discourse. Free NPs, however, can also initiate something new for example by making requests or introducing new topics.
Keywords: Finnish, free NP, interactional linguistics, prosody, syntax, morphosyntax
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 3.Morphosyntactic features of free NPs
- 4.Prosodic features of free NPs
- 5.Interactional functions of free NPs
- 6.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements -
Notes -
References
References
Aho, Eija
2010 Spontaanin puheen prosodinen jaksottelu. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Doctoral dissertation. [URL] [retrieved December 28, 2015].
Antaki, Charles
2012 Affiliative and disaffiliative candidate understandings. Discourse Studies 14(5). 531–547. 
Arkisyn = Arkisyn
A morphosyntactically coded database of conversational Finnish. Data-base compiled at the University of Turku, with material from the Conversation Analysis Archive at the University of Helsinki and the Syntax Archives at the University of Turku. Department of Finnish and Finno-Ugric Languages, University of Turku.
Auer, Peter
2005 Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1). 7–36.
Barnes, Betsy K.
1985 The pragmatics of left detachment in spoken standard French (Pragmatics and Beyond VI, 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2019 Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1, retrieved 13 July 2019 [URL]
Bruce, Gösta
2005 Intonational prominence in varieties of Swedish revisited. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 410–429. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chafe, Wallace
1987 Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grouding in discourse, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1988 Linking Intonation Units in Spoken English. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, 10–27. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
1994 Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
2018 Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cruttenden, Alan
1986 Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino & Susanna Cummings
1992 Discourse transcription. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, vol. 4. Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Erman, Britt & Beatrice Warren
2000 The idiom principle and open choice principle. Text 20(1). 29–62.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson
2002 Constituency and the Grammar of Turn Increments. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence, 14–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
1991 Syntaktiset rakenteet kertomuksen jäsentiminä. Virittäjä 95. 33–47.
1997 Functions of case-marking vs. non-marking in conversational Finnish. In Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Kristin Davidse & Dirk Noël (eds.), Reconnecting Language: Morphology and Syntax in Functional Perspectives. CILT. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Nobufumi, Inaba
2013 Functions of free NPs in Old Finnish texts. Paper presented at the Grammar and Context Conference, June 2013. University of Tartu.
Heritage, John
1984 A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2012 The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 30–52.
Hopper, Paul
1987 Emergent grammar. In John Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds.), Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 139–157. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Huumo, Tuomas
2013 On the many faces of incompleteness: Hide-and-seek with the Finnish partitive object. Folia Linguistica 47(1). 1–23.
Huumo, Tuomas & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
2015 On the subject of subject in Finnish. In Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Subjects in constructions: Canonical and non-canonical, 13–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laakso, Minna & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2010 Cut-off or particle: Devices for initiating self-repair in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 1151–1172.
Lagae, Véronique
2007 Left-detachment and topic-marking in French: The case of quant à and en fait de
. Folia Linguistica 41(3). 327–355.
Laury, Ritva, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds.) 2015 Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics. Special Issue. Pragmatics 24(3).
Laury, Ritva & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
2016 Detached NPs with relative clauses in Finnish conversations. In M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (eds.), Information structuring of spoken language from a cross-linguistic perspective, 149–165. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
1994 Unattached NPs in English Conversation. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2011 Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: the online formatting of left- and right dislocations in French conversation. In Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, 45–87. Berlin: Mouton.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Elwys de Stefani & Anne-Sofie Horlacher
2015 Time and emergence in grammar. Dislocation, topicalization and hanging topic in French talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Selting, Margret & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
Seppänen, Eeva-Leena
1997 Vuorovaikutus paperilla. In Liisa Tainio (ed.), Keskustelunanalyysin perusteet, 18–31. Tampere: Vastapaino.
Siro, Paavo
1964 Suomen kielen lauseoppi. Helsinki: Tietosanakirja.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2001 Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena & Liisa, Raevaara
2014 On the grammatical form of making requests at the convenience store: Requesting as embodied action. In Paul Drew & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Requesting in Social Interaction, 243–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tao, Hongyin
Terasaki, A. K.
2004 Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, 171–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Voronov, Mikhail
To appear. Kielellinen muutos ja sen ymmärtäminen. Tapaustutkimuksena totaaliobjektin merkinnän tasoittuminen Pohjois-Norjan kainun murteissa. Turku: University of Turku doctoral dissertation.