Cover not available
Part of
The Evolution of Pronunciation Teaching and Research: 25 years of intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness
Edited by John M. Levis, Tracey M. Derwing and Murray J. Munro
[Benjamins Current Topics 121] 2022
► pp. 207–228

Investigating the relationship between comprehensibility and social evaluation

ORCID logo | University of Oregon
 | University of Oregon
The processing fluency hypothesis proposes that listeners’ perceived difficulty processing the speech of L2 speakers (called comprehensibility/processing fluency) leads them to downgrade those speakers socially. In this paper, we investigate this relationship, focusing on context-specificity. L1-English listeners provided comprehensibility and social evaluation ratings of L1-Korean speakers speaking English, while an orthographic depiction of the speech either appeared alongside the audio or did not, a manipulation aiming to affect comprehensibility. Varying orthography between subjects, Experiment 1 found that orthography resulted in greater comprehensibility, but not more positive social evaluations. Experiment 2 manipulated orthography within subjects, varying context: orthography trials were presented first or last. Comprehensibility and social evaluation ratings were related only when orthography was first, suggesting a conditional, asymmetrical relationship where listeners more readily downgrade than upgrade the same speaker when orthography changes. Our results highlight the context-dependent nature of these constructs, limiting the generalizability of the processing fluency hypothesis.
Keywords: social evaluation, status, solidarity, comprehensibility, processing fluency
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Social evaluation and comprehensibility/processing fluency
    • 1.2The present study
  • 2.Experiment 1
    • 2.1Materials and methods
      • 2.1.1Materials
      • 2.1.2Procedure
      • 2.1.3Participants
    • 2.2Results
      • 2.2.1Manipulation check
      • 2.2.2Focal analyses
    • 2.3Discussion
  • 3.Experiment 2
    • 3.1Materials and methods
      • 3.1.1Materials
      • 3.1.2Procedure
      • 3.1.3Participants
    • 3.2Results
      • 3.2.1Manipulation check
      • 3.2.2Focal analyses
    • 3.3Discussion
  • 4.General discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.121.10vau
References (52)
References
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R. & Alexander, J. A. (2007). Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4): 2339–2349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, E. M. & Brennan, J. S. (1981). Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English Speech, Language and Speech, 24(3), 207–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, M. J., Ohashi, R., Nebashi, R., Liu, W. Y., & Shearman, S. M. (2002). Attitudinal and affective response toward accented English. Language and Communication, 22(2), 171–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, A., Levon, E., Sharma, D., Watt, D., & Ye, Y. (2019). Inter-speaker variation and the evaluation of British English accents in employment contexts. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (1615–1619). Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
De Meo, A., Vitale, M., Pettorino, M. & Martin, P. (2011). Acoustic-perceptual credibility correlates of news reading by native and Chinese speakers of Italian. In W. Lee & E. Zee (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (1366–1369). Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J. A., & Mahoney, B. (2004). The effect of accent evaluation and evidence on a suspect’s perceived guilt and criminality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(1), 63–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dragojevic, M. (2020). Extending the fluency principle: Factors that increase listeners’ processing fluency positively bias their language attitudes. Communication Monographs, (87)2, 158–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dragojevic, M., & Giles, H. (2014). The reference frame effect: An intergroup perspective on language attitudes. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 91–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). I don’t like you because you’re hard to understand: The role of processing fluency in the language attitudes process. Human Communication Research, 42(3), 396–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dragojevic, M., Giles, H., Beck, A. C., & Tatum, N. T. (2017). The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 385–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., & Rakić, T. (2014). Language attitudes: Social determinants and consequences of language variation. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, 11–26. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall-Lew, L., Paiva Couceiro, I., & Fairs, A. (2019). Credibility without intelligibility: Implications for hearing vernacular speakers. In R. Blake, & I. Buchstaller (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Work of John R. Rickford (220–230). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hosoda, M., & Stone-Romero, E. (2010). The effects of foreign accents on employment-related decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(2), 113–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, G., & Lindemann, S. (2009). Stereotypes of Cantonese English, apparent native/non-native status, and their effect on non-native English speakers’ perception. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30(3), 253–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingvalson, E. M., Lansford, K. L., Federova, V., & Fernandez, G. (2017a). Listeners’ attitudes toward accented talkers uniquely predicts accented speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(3), 234–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingvalson, E. M., Lansford, K. L., Fedorova, V., & Fernandez, G. (2017b). Cognitive factors as predictors of accented speech perception for younger and older adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(6), 4652–4659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., & Rubin, D. L. (2009). Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectations on speech evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(4), 441–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, N., & O’Brien, E. (2016). The tipping point of moral change: When do good and bad acts make good and bad actors? Social Cognition, 34(2), 149–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1093–1096. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Less-detailed representation of non-native language: Why non-native speakers’ stories seem more vague. Discourse Processes, 49(7), 523–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. (2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2015). The interpersonal consequences of processing ease: Fluency as a metacognitive foundation for prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 143–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, S. (2003). Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3), 348–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, S., & Subtirelu, N. (2013). Reliably biased: The role of listener expectation in the perception of second language speech. Language Learning, 63(3), 567–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed). London, England: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdecke, D. (2018). sjPlot: Data Visualization for Statistics in Social Science. R package version 2.4.1.9000.Google Scholar
McGowan, K. B. (2015). Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech, 58(4), 502–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, D. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Bent, T., Borrie, S. A., & Van Engen, K. J. (2018). Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1559–1570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, D. J., & Van Engen, K. J. (2020). Task-evoked pupil response for accurately recognized accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(2), 151–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. (2018). Dimensions of pronunciation. In O. Kang, R. Thomson, & J. Murphy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary English Pronunciation (413–431). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M. (1995a). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995b). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language & Speech, 38(3), 289–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C., Trofimovich, P., & Bergeron, A. (2019). Toward a dynamic view of second language comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 647–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, D. (2019). Processing fluency, perceptual adaptation, and language attitudes: Does adaptation improve comprehension ease and attitudes toward speakers with non-native accents? [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Carranza, M. A. and Moffie, R. W. (1977). Reactions toward varying degrees of accentedness in the speech of Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 20, 267–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., & Sebastian, R. J. (1982). An integrative perspective for the study of attitudes toward language variation. In E. B. Ryan & H. Giles (Eds.), Attitudes Towards Language Variation: Social and Applied Contexts (1–19). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Souza, A. L., & Markman, A. B. (2013). Foreign accent does not influence cognitive judgments. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 35(35) 1360–1365.Google Scholar
Sparks, J., & Ledgerwood, A. (2017). When good is stickier than bad: Understanding gain/loss asymmetries in sequential framing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(8), 1086–1105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stocker, L. (2017). The Impact of Foreign Accent on Credibility: An Analysis of Cognitive Statement Ratings in a Swiss Context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(3), 617–628. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sumner, M. and Kataoka, R. (2013). Effects of phonetically-cued talker variation on semantic-encoding. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(6), EL485–EL491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sumner, M., Kim, S. K., King, E., & McGowan, K. B. (2014). The socially-weighted encoding of spoken words: A dual-route approach to speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1015) 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor Reid, K., Trofimovich, P., & O’Brien, M. G. (2019). Social attitudes and speech ratings: Effects of positive and negative bias on multiage listeners’ judgments of second language speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tzeng, C. Y., Alexander, J. E., Sidaras, S. K., Nygaard, L. C. (2016). The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(11), 1–17.Google Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2010). The Wildcat Corpus of native-and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language & Speech, 53(4), 510–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, C. (2019). Expectations about the source of a speaker’s accent affect accent adaptation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(5), 3218–3232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, C., & Baese-Berk, M. (2019). Effects of talker order on accent ratings. In S. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Zuengler, J., & Bent, B. (1991). Relative knowledge of content domain: An influence on native-non-native conversations. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 397–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar