PERSON climbing up a tree
(and other adventures in sign language grammaticalization)
Studies on sign language grammaticalization have demonstrated that most of the attested diachronic changes from lexical to functional elements parallel those previously described for spoken languages. To date, most of these studies are either descriptive in nature or embedded within functional-cognitive theories. In contrast, we take a generative perspective on sign language grammaticalization, adopting ideas by Roberts & Roussou (2003), who suggest that grammaticalization can be characterized as “reanalysis ‘upwards’ along the functional structure”. Following an overview of some of the attested modality-independent pathways, we zoom in on the grammaticalization of two types of agreement auxiliaries, the lexical sources of which are the verb GIVE and the noun PERSON. We argue that the grammaticalization of GIVE-AUX (in Greek Sign Language and Catalan Sign Language) follows directly from Roberts & Roussou’s model because a lexical verb is reanalyzed as an element which is merged in a structurally higher functional position (little v). The same is true for PERSON, but this change has an additional modality-specific flavor. In spoken languages, agreement affixes typically enter the functional domain of V via cliticization. In contrast, in German Sign Language and Catalan Sign Language, PERSON, after having been reanalyzed as a determiner-like element, ‘jumps’ directly from D into AgrO — most probably because it has the relevant spatial properties necessary to express agreement. Thus, grammaticalization in sign languages, while being structurally similar, allows for types of reanalysis that are not attested in spoken languages.
References
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler
2005 The paradox of sign language morphology.
Language 81(2). 301–344.
Barberà, Gemma
2012 The meaning of space in Catalan Sign Language (LSC): Reference, specificity and structure in signed discourse. PhD dissertation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
Battison, Robbin
1978 Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
Bertone, Carmela
2007 La struttura del sintagma determinante nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). PhD dissertation, University of Venice.
Borer, Hagit
2005 In name only (Structuring sense, Volume I). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bos, Heleen
1994 An auxiliary verb in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In
Inger Ahlgren,
Brita Bergman &
Mary Brennan (eds.),
Perspectives on sign language structure, 37–53. Durham: ISLA.
Brunelli, Michele
2011 Antisymmetry and sign languages: A comparison between NGT and LIS. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT.
Bybee, Joan L. & Östen Dahl
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1986 Knowledge of language. Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In
Roger Martin,
David Michaels &
Juan Uriagereka (eds.),
Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honour of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij, Dafydd Waters, Bencie Woll & Johanna Mesch
Egerland, Verner
2010 On Old Italian uomo and the classification of indefinite expressions. In
Roberta d’Alessandro,
Adam Ledgeway &
Ian Roberts (eds.),
Syntactic variation: The syntax of Italian dialects, 71–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Emmorey, Karen
1999 Do signers gesture? In
Lynn S. Messing &
Ruth Campbell (eds.),
Gesture, speech, and sign, 133–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fischer, Susan
1975 Influences on word order change in ASL. In
Charles N. Li (ed.),
Word order and word order change, 1–25. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Fischer, Susan & Bonnie Gough
Frishberg, Nancy
1975 Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language.
Language 51, 696–719.
Gelderen, Elly van
2011a Grammaticalization and generative grammar: A difficult liaison. In
Heiko Narrog &
Bernd Heine (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 43–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gelderen, Elly van
2011b The linguistic cycle. Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giusti, Giuliana
2001 The birth of a functional category: from Latin ille to the Romance article and personal pronoun. In
Guglielmo Cinque &
Giampaolo Salvi (eds.),
Current studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 157–171. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Harley, Heidi
1995 Subjects, events, and licensing. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd
1993 Auxiliaries. Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002a On the evolution of grammatical forms. In
Alison Wray (ed.),
The transition to language. Studies in the evolution of language, 376–397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002b World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elisabeth C. Traugott
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Janis, Wynne D
1995 A crosslinguistic perspective on ASL verb agreement. In
Karen Emmorey &
Judy Reilly (eds.),
Language, gesture, and space, 195–223. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Janzen, Terry
2012 Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In
Roland Pfau,
Markus Steinbach &
Bencie Woll (eds.),
Sign language. An international handbook, 816–841. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer
2002 Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In
Richard P. Meier,
Kearsy A. Cormier &
David G. Quinto-Pozos (eds.),
Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 199–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, Trevor
2003 Language standardization and signed language dictionaries.
Sign Language Studies 3(4). 431–468.
Keller, Jörg
1998 Aspekte der Raumnutzung in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. Hamburg: Signum.
Kuteva, Tania
2001 Auxiliation. An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ladewig, Silva
2011 Syntactic and semantic integration of gestures into speech — structural, cognitive, and conceptual aspects. PhD dissertation, Europa-Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder).
Lehmann, Christian
1995 Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: LINCOM.
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard P. Meier
2011 On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages.
Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 95–141.
Loon, Esther van
2012 What’s in the palm of your hands? Discourse functions of palm-up in Sign Language of the Netherlands. MA thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Loon, Esther van, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach
2014 The grammaticalization of gestures in sign languages. In
Cornelia Müller,
Alan Cienki,
Ellen Fricke,
Silva H. Ladewig,
David McNeill &
Sedinha Tessendorf (eds.),
Body — language — communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 2133–2149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Marsaja, I. Gede
2008 Desa Kolok — A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
Murmann, Christina, Peter Indefrey, Thomas Weskott & Markus Steinbach
2013 Why forget needs help but help does not. An experimental study on the influence of animacy/agreement on the distribution of pam. Poster presented at TISLR 11, July 10–12, London.
McKee, Rachel L. & Sophia Wallingford
Meir, Irit
2002 A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20. 413–450.
Müller, Cornelia, Silva Ladewig & Jana Bressem
2013 Gestures and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history. In
Cornelia Müller,
Alan Cienki,
Ellen Fricke,
Silva H. Ladewig,
David McNeill &
Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.),
Body — language — communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 55–81. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine
(eds.) 2011 The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee
2000 The syntax of American Sign Language. Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Neidle, Carol & Joan Nash
2012 The noun phrase. In
Roland Pfau,
Markus Steinbach &
Bencie Woll (eds.),
Sign language. An international handbook, 265–292. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nevins, Andrew
2011 Prospects and challenges for a clitic analysis of (A)SL agreement.
Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 173–187.
Norde, Muriel
2011 Degrammaticalization. In
Heiko Narrog &
Bernd Heine (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 475–487. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Padden, Carol
1988 Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.
Pfau, Roland
2008 The grammar of headshake: A typological perspective on German Sign Language negation.
Linguistics in Amsterdam 2008(1). 37–74.
Pfau, Roland
2011 A point well taken: On the typology and diachrony of pointing. In
Donna Jo Napoli &
Gaurav Mathur (eds.),
Deaf around the world, 144–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pfau, Roland, Martin Salzmann & Markus Steinbach
2010 Sign language agreement is syntactic: The importance of auxiliaries. Paper presented at Taalkunde in Nederland (TIN dag), Utrecht, February 2010.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2006 Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages (
Linguistics in Potsdam 24). Potsdam: Universitäts-Verlag.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2011 Grammaticalization in sign languages. In
Heiko Narrog &
Bernd Heine (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 683–695. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP.
Linguistic Inquiry 20(3). 365–424.
Quadros, Ronice M. de & Josep Quer
2010 The proper characterization of agreement in sign languages. Manuscript, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina & ICREA-Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Quer, Josep & Santiago Frigola
2006 Crosslinguistic research and particular grammars: A case study on auxiliary predicates in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Paper presented at Workshop on Cross-linguistic Sign Language Research, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, January 2006.
Quinto-Pozos, David
(ed.) 2007 Sign languages in contact. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Ramat, Paolo
1992 Thoughts on degrammaticalization.
Linguistics 30. 549–560.
Rathmann, Christian
2000 The optionality of agreement phrase: Evidence from signed languages. Master’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Rathmann, Christian & Gaurav Mathur
2002 Is verb agreement the same crossmodally? In
Richard P. Meier,
Kearsy A. Cormier &
David G. Quinto-Pozos (eds.),
Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 370–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ringe, Don
2003 Internal reconstruction. In
Brian D. Joseph &
Richard D. Janda (eds.),
The handbook of historical linguistics, 244–261. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rizzi, Luigi
2001 On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In
Guglielmo Cinque &
Giampaolo Salvi (eds.),
Current studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2003 Syntactic change. A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sapountzaki, Galini
2005 Free functional elements of tense, aspect, modality and agreement as possible auxiliaries in Greek Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Bristol.
Sapountzaki, Galini
2012 Agreement auxiliaries. In
Roland Pfau,
Markus Steinbach &
Bencie Woll (eds.),
Sign language. An international handbook, 204–227. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schermer, Trude
2003 From variant to standard: An overview of the standardization process of the lexicon of Sign Language of the Netherlands over two decades.
Sign Language Studies 3. 469–486.
Schermer, Trude
2012 Language planning. In
Roland Pfau,
Markus Steinbach &
Bencie Woll (eds.),
Sign language. An international handbook, 889–908. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sexton, Amy L
1999 Grammaticalization in American Sign Language.
Language Sciences 21. 105–141.
Simpson, Andrew
2005 Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asia. In
Guglielmo Cinque &
Richard Kayne (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 806–838. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, Wayne H
1990 Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language. In
Susan D. Fischer &
Patricia Siple (eds.),
Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1: Linguistics, 211–228. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Steele, Susan M
1978 The category AUX as a language universal. In
Joseph J. Greenberg (ed.),
Universals of human language. Vol. 3: Word structure, 7–45. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Steinbach, Markus & Roland Pfau
2007 Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign languages. In
Pamela M. Perniss,
Roland Pfau &
Markus Steinbach (eds.),
Visible variation: Cross-linguistic studies on sign language structure, 303–339. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wilcox, Sherman
2007 Routes from gesture to language. In
Elena A. Pizzuto,
Paola Pietrandrea &
Raffaele Simone (eds.),
Verbal and signed languages. Comparing structures, constructs, and methodologies, 107–131. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wilcox, Sherman, Paolo Rossini & Elena A. Pizzuto
2010 Grammaticalization in sign languages. In
Diane Brentari (ed.),
Sign languages, 332–354. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilcox, Sherman & Phyllis Wilcox
Woll, Bencie
1987 Historical and comparative aspects of British Sign Language. In
Jim Kyle (ed.),
Sign and school: Using signs in deaf children’s development, 12–34. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Wehrmeyer, Ella
2019.
Linguistic Interference in Interpreting from English to South African Sign Language. In
English in Multilingual South Africa,
► pp. 371 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.