On multiple source constructions in language change
References (32)
References
Allan, Kathryn. 2010. A dull paper: An example of proportional analogy in semantic change? Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics(ICEHL) at the University of Pécs, 23–27 August 2010.
Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele E. Goldberg. 2011. Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in “a”-adjective production. Language 87(1). 1–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burridge, Kate. 1992. Creating grammar: Examples from Pennsylvania German, Ontario. In: Kate Burridge & Werner Enninger (eds.), Diachronic studies on the languages of the Anabaptists (Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 17), 199–241. Bochum: N. Brockmeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In: Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan. 2007. Diachronic linguistics. In: Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The handbook of cognitive linguistics, 945–987. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bynon, Theodora. 1983. Historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, Gerald L. 1987. Syntactic blends in English parole. Frankfurt: Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fortson, Benjamin W. 2010. Indo-European language and culture: An introduction, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1997. Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, Nikolaus.P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: opposite or orthogonal? In: Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann, Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Israël, Michael. 1996. The way constructions grow. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–230. Stanford: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26. 79–102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Menard, Philippe. 1978. Manuel du français du moyen âge, vol. 1, Syntaxe de l’ancien français.Bordeaux: SOBODI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Menge, Hermann. 2000. Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondorf, Britta. 2011. Variation and change in English resultatives. Language Variation and Change 22. 397–421. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
OED: Murray, James A.H., Henry Brodly, W.A. Craigie & C.T. Onions. 1993. The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online at [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Philippa, Marlies, Frans Debrabandere, Arend Quak, Tanneke Schoonheim & Nicoline van der Sijs. 2003–2009. Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ringe, Don. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth.C. 2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization’. Cognitive Linguistics 18. 523–557. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Bree, Cor. 1996. Historische taalkunde, 2nd edn. Leuven: Acco.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Coetsem, Frans. 1982. The development of the Germanic reduplicating class: Reanalysis and competition in morphological change. In Irmengard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr (eds.), Language change, 39–88. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van der Horst, Johannes M. & Freek Van de Velde. 2003. Zo vreemd een groep. Taal & Tongval Thematic issue 15/16. 237–250.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van de Velde, Freek & Johannes M. van der Horst. 2013. Homoplasy in diachronic grammar. Language Sciences 36. 66–77. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van de Velde, Freek & Johannes M. van der Horst. Manuscript. The diachrony of so odd a noun phrase.
Wischer, Ilse. 2010. Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik. In Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung: Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung, 29–40. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Hilpert, Martin
2024.
Corpus linguistics meets historical linguistics and construction grammar: how far have we come, and where do we go from here?.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
2022.
On Multiple Paths and Change in the Language Network.
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3
► pp. 359 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Masini, Francesca & Simone Mattiola
2022.
Syntactic discontinuous reduplication with antonymic pairs: a case study from Italian.
Linguistics 60:1
► pp. 315 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.