Part of
On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change
Edited by Hendrik De Smet, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde
[Benjamins Current Topics 79] 2015
► pp. 1942
References
Akimoto, Minoji & Laurel Brinton
1999The origin of the composite predicate in old English. In Laurel Brinton & Minoji Akimoto (eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English, 21–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Algeo, John
1995Having a look at the expanded predicate. In Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English, 203–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
2008Where lexis and grammar meet: Composite predicates in English. In Elena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds.), in collaboration with Teresa Fanego, Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization, 33–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel & Minoji Akimoto
1999Introduction. In Laurel Brinton & Minoji Akimoto (eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1995Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10. 425–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82. 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia
2000Multi-word verbs in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Colleman, Timothy & Bernard De Clerck
2011Constructional semantics on the move: On semantic specialization in the English double object construction. Cognitive Linguistics 21. 183–209.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 273–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2005A corpus of late Modern English texts. ICAME Journal 29. 69–82.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas
2008Dependencies are constructions: A case study in predicative complementation. In Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 219–256. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Ray Jackendoff
2004The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80. 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its fringes and its components, 19–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian & Joybrato Mukherjee
2007Ditransitive verbs in Indian English and British English: A corpus-linguistic study. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 32. 5–24.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A
1984Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007Language networks: The new Word Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate
2002 [1988]Light verbs in English. Ms.
Kemmer, Suzanne & Michael Barlow
2000Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 7–28. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2005Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical and less so. In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza & Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 101–159. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith
2009Change in contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A
1998Aspectual grammar and past-time reference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Stefan T. Gries
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Ivan Sag & Thomas Wasow
1994Idioms. Language 70. 491–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, Gabrielle
1991The phrasal verb type ‘to have a look’ in Modern English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 29. 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1999A historical overview of composite predicate types. In Laurel Brinton & Minoji Akimoto (eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English, 239–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2008Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate in English. In Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 33–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Combettes, Bernard, Mathilde Dargnat, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. Grammaire de constructions et diachronie : Intensivité et concession. SHS Web of Conferences 27  pp. 04001 ff. DOI logo
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
2022. On Multiple Paths and Change in the Language Network. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Maekelberghe, Charlotte
2022. From noun to verb. In English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 221],  pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Voicu, Roxana
2019. La polarité de un tant soit peu. Journal of French Language Studies 29:03  pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.