Language as a network of dependencies or constructions is a central feature of many cognitive theories of grammar. In this network, inheritance relationships are used to describe synchronic facts about a language whereby members of a less abstract set inherit properties from a more general set, and in the case of multiple inheritance, from more than one general set. This article explores some of the ways in which the language network may change over time, particularly the ways in which more than one constructional type may be considered to be the source of a change in the network.
1999The origin of the composite predicate in old English. In Laurel Brinton & Minoji Akimoto (eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English, 21–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Algeo, John
1995Having a look at the expanded predicate. In Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English, 203–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1999Introduction. In Laurel Brinton & Minoji Akimoto (eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brinton, Laurel & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan
1995Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10. 425–455.
Bybee, Joan
2008From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82. 711–733.
Claridge, Claudia
2000Multi-word verbs in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Colleman, Timothy & Bernard De Clerck
2011Constructional semantics on the move: On semantic specialization in the English double object construction. Cognitive Linguistics 21. 183–209.
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Smet, Hendrik
2005A corpus of late Modern English texts. ICAME Journal 29. 69–82.
Gisborne, Nikolas
2008Dependencies are constructions: A case study in predicative complementation. In Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 219–256. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goldberg, Adele E
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E
2006Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. & Ray Jackendoff
2004The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80. 532–568.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its fringes and its components, 19–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoffmann, Sebastian & Joybrato Mukherjee
2007Ditransitive verbs in Indian English and British English: A corpus-linguistic study. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 32. 5–24.
Hudson, Richard A
1984Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hudson, Richard A
2007Language networks: The new Word Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kearns, Kate
2002 [1988]Light verbs in English. Ms.
Kemmer, Suzanne & Michael Barlow
2000Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 7–28. Stanford: CSLI.
Langacker, Ronald W
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W
2005Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical and less so. In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza & Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 101–159. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W
2008Cognitive Grammar: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith
2009Change in contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Michaelis, Laura A
1998Aspectual grammar and past-time reference. London: Routledge.
1991The phrasal verb type ‘to have a look’ in Modern English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 29. 1–29.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1999A historical overview of composite predicate types. In Laurel Brinton & Minoji Akimoto (eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English, 239–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Trousdale, Graeme
2008Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate in English. In Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 33–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Combettes, Bernard, Mathilde Dargnat, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. Grammaire de constructions et diachronie : Intensivité et concession. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 04001 ff.
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
2022. On Multiple Paths and Change in the Language Network. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3 ► pp. 359 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.