Introduction
Current trends in analyzing syntactic variation
This article is available free of charge.
References (15)
References
Bruening, Benjamin. 2010. “Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives”. Linguistic Inquiry 411: 287–305. 

Bresnan, Joan W., and Marilyn Ford. 2010. “Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English.” Language 86 (1): 168–213. 

Cappelle, Bert. 2006. “Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’”. Constructions
Gries, Stefan Th.. 2003. Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: a study of Particle Placement. London & New York: Continuum Press.
Heller, Benedikt, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Jason Grafmiller. 2017. “Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: the genitive alternation across varieties of
English”. Journal of English Linguistics 45(1): 3–27. 

Jackendoff, Ray, and Perter William Culicover. 1971. “A Reconsideration of Dative Movement.” Foundations of Language 71: 397–412.
Katz, Jerrold, and Paul Postal. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago (Ill.): University of Chicago press.
Larson, R. K. 1988. “On the Double Object Construction”. Linguistic Inquiry 191: 335–393.
Newman, John. 1996. Give: a cognitive linguistic study. Cognitive linguistics research 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Rothman, Jason. 2009. “Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage
Languages.” International Journal of Bilingualism 131: 155–163. 

Shank, Christopher, Van Bogaert Julie, and Koen Plevoets. 2016. The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with
think, suppose, and believe. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 12(1): 31–72. 

Vanderschueren, Clara, and Kevin Diependaele. 2013. “The Portuguese Inflected Infinitive: An Empirical Approach.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9 (1): 161–186. 

Wulff, Stefanie. 2016. “A friendly conspiracy of input, L1, and processing demands: that – variation in German and Spanish
learner language”. In The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (Proceedings of GURT 2014), edited by Lourdes Ortega, Andrea E. Tyler, Hae In Park and Mariko Uno, 115–136. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.