Introduction published In:
Current trends in analyzing syntactic variation
Edited by Ludovic De Cuypere, Clara Vanderschueren and Gert de Sutter
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31] 2017
► pp. 17
References
Bruening, Benjamin
2010 “Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives”. Linguistic Inquiry 411: 287–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan W., and Marilyn Ford
2010 “Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English.” Language 86 (1): 168–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2006 “Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’”. ConstructionsGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th.
2003Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: a study of Particle Placement. London & New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Benedikt, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Jason Grafmiller
2017 “Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: the genitive alternation across varieties of English”. Journal of English Linguistics 45(1): 3–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray, and Perter William Culicover
1971 “A Reconsideration of Dative Movement.” Foundations of Language 71: 397–412.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold, and Paul Postal
1964An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago (Ill.): University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Larson, R. K.
1988 “On the Double Object Construction”. Linguistic Inquiry 191: 335–393.Google Scholar
Newman, John
1996Give: a cognitive linguistic study. Cognitive linguistics research 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Jason
2009 “Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage Languages.” International Journal of Bilingualism 131: 155–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günther
2003 “Aspects of grammatical iconicity in English.” In From Sign to Signing, edited by Wolfgang G. Müller and Olga Fischer, 263–285. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shank, Christopher, Van Bogaert Julie, and Koen Plevoets
2016The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 12(1): 31–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanderschueren, Clara, and Kevin Diependaele
2013 “The Portuguese Inflected Infinitive: An Empirical Approach.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9 (1): 161–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie
2016 “A friendly conspiracy of input, L1, and processing demands: that – variation in German and Spanish learner language”. In The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (Proceedings of GURT 2014), edited by Lourdes Ortega, Andrea E. Tyler, Hae In Park and Mariko Uno, 115–136. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.