Introduction published In:
Current trends in analyzing syntactic variation
Edited by Ludovic De Cuypere, Clara Vanderschueren and Gert de Sutter
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31] 2017
► pp. 17
References (15)
References
Bruening, Benjamin. 2010. “Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives”. Linguistic Inquiry 411: 287–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan W., and Marilyn Ford. 2010. “Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English.” Language 86 (1): 168–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2006. “Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’”. ConstructionsGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th.. 2003. Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: a study of Particle Placement. London & New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Benedikt, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Jason Grafmiller. 2017. “Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: the genitive alternation across varieties of English”. Journal of English Linguistics 45(1): 3–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray, and Perter William Culicover. 1971. “A Reconsideration of Dative Movement.” Foundations of Language 71: 397–412.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold, and Paul Postal. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago (Ill.): University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Larson, R. K. 1988. “On the Double Object Construction”. Linguistic Inquiry 191: 335–393.Google Scholar
Newman, John. 1996. Give: a cognitive linguistic study. Cognitive linguistics research 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Jason. 2009. “Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage Languages.” International Journal of Bilingualism 131: 155–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günther. 2003. “Aspects of grammatical iconicity in English.” In From Sign to Signing, edited by Wolfgang G. Müller and Olga Fischer, 263–285. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shank, Christopher, Van Bogaert Julie, and Koen Plevoets. 2016. The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 12(1): 31–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanderschueren, Clara, and Kevin Diependaele. 2013. “The Portuguese Inflected Infinitive: An Empirical Approach.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9 (1): 161–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie. 2016. “A friendly conspiracy of input, L1, and processing demands: that – variation in German and Spanish learner language”. In The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (Proceedings of GURT 2014), edited by Lourdes Ortega, Andrea E. Tyler, Hae In Park and Mariko Uno, 115–136. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.