Introduction
Current trends in analyzing syntactic variation
This article is available free of charge.
References
Bruening, Benjamin
2010 “
Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives”.
Linguistic Inquiry 411: 287–305.
Bresnan, Joan W., and Marilyn Ford
2010 “
Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English.”
Language 86 (1): 168–213.
Cappelle, Bert
2006 “
Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’”.
Constructions
Gries, Stefan Th.
2003 Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: a study of Particle Placement. London & New York: Continuum Press.
Heller, Benedikt, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Jason Grafmiller
2017 “
Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: the genitive alternation across varieties of
English”.
Journal of English Linguistics 45(1): 3–27.
Jackendoff, Ray, and Perter William Culicover
1971 “
A Reconsideration of Dative Movement.”
Foundations of Language 71: 397–412.
Katz, Jerrold, and Paul Postal
1964 An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago (Ill.): University of Chicago press.
Larson, R. K.
1988 “
On the Double Object Construction”.
Linguistic Inquiry 191: 335–393.
Newman, John
1996 Give: a cognitive linguistic study.
Cognitive linguistics research 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rothman, Jason
2009 “
Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage
Languages.”
International Journal of Bilingualism 131: 155–163.
Shank, Christopher, Van Bogaert Julie, and Koen Plevoets
2016 The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with
think, suppose, and believe.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 12(1): 31–72.
Vanderschueren, Clara, and Kevin Diependaele
2013 “
The Portuguese Inflected Infinitive: An Empirical Approach.”
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9 (1): 161–186.
Wulff, Stefanie
2016 “
A friendly conspiracy of input, L1, and processing demands: that – variation in German and Spanish
learner language”. In
The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (Proceedings of GURT 2014), edited by
Lourdes Ortega,
Andrea E. Tyler,
Hae In Park and
Mariko Uno, 115–136. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.