Cover not available
Article published In:
Latin influence on the syntax of the languages of Europe
Edited by Bert Cornillie and Bridget Drinka
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 33] 2019
► pp. 82–107

On the pace of syntactic elaboration from Latin calques

Evidence from Spanish, Dutch and English

 | KU Leuven
This paper addresses the auxiliation/grammaticalization of amenazar (Spanish), dreigen (Dutch), threaten (English), against the background of the competition between the vernacular languages and Latin. It shows that the subjective reading of ‘threaten’, expressing a prediction on the basis of some kind of evidence, is a Latin calque, and that the syntactic creativity or syntactic elaboration starts from this calque. In the three cases, ‘threaten’ is combined with the semantics of ‘fall’, which indicates the roofing role of Latin. The paper shows that the pace of the constructional change from ‘threaten’ + np to ‘threaten’ + inf is different from one language to another. Spanish amenazar grammaticalizes into an auxiliary during the Renaissance of the 15th and 16th century. In the case of Dutch, by contrast, only in the Golden Age of the 17th century do writers start to use dreigen ‘threaten’ as an auxiliary. Finally, English develops the auxiliary one century later than the Dutch one. The chronological differences are explained on the basis of the cultural and linguistic elaborations typical of Golden centuries, which vary from one nation to another.
Keywords: Latin calque, auxiliation, grammaticalization, syntactic elaboration, vernacular languages, Spanish, Dutch, English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Objective and subjective readings
  • 3.The rise of subjective amenazar ‘threaten’ in Spanish
  • 4.The rise of subjective dreigen ‘threaten’ in Dutch
  • 5.The rise of subjective threaten in English
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00023.cor
References (52)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2003. “‘Epistemic Creationism’: Myths vs. profunda facie Explanatory Irrefutables on Modal Verbs in German and in Genera.”’ In Grammar in Focus. Festschrift for Christer Platzack Vol.II1, ed. by Lars-Olof Delsin, Josefsson, Gunlög Sigurðsson, Armann Halldor, and Cecilia Falk, 1–88. Lund: Lund University, Department of Scandinavian Languages.Google Scholar
Askedal, Jan Ole. 1997. “ Drohen und versprechen als sog. ‘Modalitätsverben’ in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache.” Deutsch als Fremdsprache 341: 12–19.Google Scholar
Blatt, Franz. 1957. “Latin influence on European syntax.” Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 111: 33–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, Bert, and Álvaro Octavio de Toledo y Huerta. 2015. “The diachrony of subjective amenazar ‘threaten’. On Latin-induced grammaticalization in Spanish.” In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research, ed. by Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale, and Richard Waltereit, 187–208. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2005a. “Agentivity and subjectivity in Spanish prometer and amenazar. A study of constructional and diatopical variation.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 51: 171–196.Google Scholar
. 2005b. “A paradigmatic view of Spanish amenazar ‘to threaten’ and prometer ‘to promise’.” Folia Linguistica 39 (3/4): 385–415.Google Scholar
. 2007. Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Spanish (Semi-)Auxiliaries. A Cognitive-Functional Approach. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Over de subjectieve lezing van dreigen in het 16de- en 17de eeuwse Nederlands. Historische pragmatiek vs contact-geïnduceerde taalverandering.”, In Patroon en argument. Een dubbelfeestbundel bij het emeritaat van William Van Belle en Joop van der Horst, ed. by Freek Van de Velde, Hans Smessaert, Frank Van Eynde, and Sara Verbrugge, 329–348. Leuven: Leuven University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016a. “Acerca de la locución epistémica tal vez en el siglo de las Luces: innovación y especialización.” In Márgenes y centros en el español del siglo XVIII, ed. by Marta Guzmán, and Daniel Sáez, 183–199. Valencia: Tirant Humanidades.Google Scholar
. 2016b. “On the pace of the grammaticalization of ‘threaten’ and ‘promise’ in the languages of Western Europe.” Paper presented at SLE 2016, University of Naples.
. 2020. “On grammatical change and linguistic environments.” In Crossing Linguistic Boundaries. Systemic, Synchronic and Diachronic Variation in English, ed. by Paloma Núñez-Pertejo, María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, and Javier Pérez-Guerra, 105–125. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2001. “ Scheinen-Probleme: Analogie, Konstruktionsmischung und die Sogwirkung aktiver Grammatikalisierungskanäle.” In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, ed. by Reimar Müller, and Marga Reis, 87–110. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Faktizität und Evidentialität: Semantische Differenzierung bei den Modal-und Modalitätsverben im Deutschen.” In Tempus/Temporalität und Modus/Modalität im Sprachvergleich, ed. by Oddleif Leirbukt, 231–258. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, and Elena Smirnova (eds). 2010. Evidentiality in German. Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1985. “Competing motivations.” In Iconicity in Syntax, ed. by John Haiman, 343–365. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Hiroyuki Miyashita. 2004. “ Drohen und versprechen–zur Genese von funktionalen Kategorien.” Neue Beiträge zur Germanistik 3 (2): 9–33.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Hiroyuki Miyashita. 2008. Accounting for a functional category: German drohen ‘to threaten’ . Language Sciences 301: 53–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva. 2006. The changing languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, María Lluïsa. 1999. “El infinitivo.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, 2195–2356. Madrid: RAE – Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. “Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal?”. In What makes grammaticalization: A look from its components and its fringes, ed. by Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, and Bjoern Wiemer, 21–42. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. “On some principles of grammaticalization.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I1, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 17–36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kabatek, Johannes. 2005. “Las tradiciones discursivas del español medieval: historia de textos e historia de la lengua.” Iberoromania 63 (2): 28–43.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2008. Sintaxis histórica del español y cambio lingüístico: Nuevas perspectivas desde las Tradiciones Discursivas. Frankfurt/ Madrid: Vervuert/ Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
. 2013. “¿Es posible una lingüística histórica basada en un corpus representativo?” Iberoromania 77 (1): 8–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail. 2010. “Metaphorical projection, subjectification and English Speech Act verbs.” Folia Linguistica 44 (2): 339–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. 1978. Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800. [Sprache Der Gegenwart 37]. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter, and Oesterreicher, Wulf. 2011. Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania. Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch. 2ª. ed. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. “Raising and transparency.” Language 71 (1): 1–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. “Subjectification and grammaticization.” In Grammar and Conceptualization, ed. by Ronald W. Langacker, 297–315. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2006. Subjectification, Grammaticization, and Conceptual Archetypes. In Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity, ed. by Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis, and Bert Cornillie, 17–40. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Kai. 2003. “Die Lesarten von drohen und versprechen und ihre Konstruktionsarten. eine korpusanalytische Untersuchung.” Zulassungsarbeit zur Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien. Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Pinto de Lima, José. 2014. Studies on Grammaticalization and Lexicalization. Estudos de Gramaticalização e Lexicalização. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Pons Rodríguez, Lola. 2010. “La historia de los marcadores discursivos en español.” In Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy, ed. by Óscar Loureda, and Esperanza Acín, 523–615. Madrid: Arco / Libros.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga. 2004. “Modals, So-Called Semi-Modals, and Grammaticalization in German.” Paper presented at Berkeley Germanic Linguistics Roundtable. April 2–3 2004.
Rooryck, Johan. 1997. “On the interaction between Raising and Focus in sentential complementation.” Studia Linguistica 501: 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Configurations of sentential complementation: perspectives from Romance languages. Routledge: London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1972. Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
. 1983. “Montée et contrôle. Une question à revoir.” Revue Romane 241: 17–37.Google Scholar
Sánchez González de Herrero, Mª Nieves. 2011. “La importancia de la lengua de partida en las traducciones medievales al castellano del De Proprietatibus Rerum de Bartolomé Anglico.” In Así se van las lenguas variando. Nuevas tendencias en la investigación del cambio lingüístico en español, ed. by Mónica Castillo, and Lola Pons Rodríguez, 411–435. Frankfurt, Bern, etc.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. “The Conflict Promises to Erupt into War.” Berkeley Linguistics Society, 348–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. “Subjectification and the development of epistemic Meaning: the case of promise and threaten .” In Modality in Germanic Languages, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf Jansen Westvik, 185–210. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “The role of pragmatics in semantic change.” In Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference. Vol. II1, ed. by Jef Verschueren, 93–102. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Horst, Johannes. 2008. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar
van der Meulen, Paul. 1955. Het Roerspel en de Comedies van Coornhert. Leiden: Leidse Drukken en Herdrukken.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet, and Lobke Ghesquière. 2013. “On multiple source constructions in language change.” Studies in Language 371: 473–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez-Laslop, María Eugenia. 2001. “Epistemic prometer and full deontic modal verbs.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 207–241.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 1995. “Subjectification, syntax, and communication.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language, ed. by Stein Dieter, and Susan Wright, 103–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Sequential conceptualization and linear order.” In Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods: the expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics, ed. by Eugene H. Casad, 793–817. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “‘The girl that promised to become something’: An exploration into diachronic subjectification in Dutch.” In The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1997: the Dutch Language at the Millennium, ed. by Thomas F. Shannon, and Johan P. Snapper, 197–208. Lanham MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Vliegen, Maurice. 2006. “The relation between lexical and epistemic readings: the equivalents of promise and threaten in Dutch and German.” In Topics in Subjectification and Modalization, ed. by Bert Cornillie, and Nicole Delbecque, 73–95. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Molenaers, Marie
2023. On the survival of the Spanish absolute construction: a qualitative diachronic study based on a corpus of translations from Latin. Folia Linguistica 57:s44-s1 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Rickman, Paul & Juhani Rudanko
2023.  Facing Two Ways Syntactically: On the Grammar and Use of Promise and Threaten in Three Regional Varieties . English Studies 104:2 ► pp. 365 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.