Cover not available
Article published In:
Latin influence on the syntax of the languages of Europe
Edited by Bert Cornillie and Bridget Drinka
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 33] 2019
► pp. 125–149

The role of roofing

Latin influence on the development of the perfects in Europe

 | University of Texas at San Antonio
This paper presents evidence in support of the claim that Latin played a significant role as a ‘roof language’ in the languages of western Europe. It focuses on the role that Latin played at three stages of the development of the perfects in western Europe: first, as a conduit of the ‘sacral stamp of Greek’ in bible translation and as influential in other ecclesiastical contexts; secondly, through the influence of scribal tradition and the establishment of the ‘Charlemagne Sprachbund’; and, finally, as a model for classicized syntactic style of the Late Middle and Early Modern period, as exemplified by the patterns of perfect use by the translators of Boethius, especially Chaucer and Elizabeth I. Several larger generalizations also emerge from this investigation: evidence is provided for the stratified nature of Latin syntactic influence across time and space, and the effect of this recurrent replication on the temporal-aspectual systems of the western European languages. Above all, this analysis underlines the essential role of calquing in superstrate-induced change, the structural patterns that are most frequently affected, and the social motivations that foster this type of innovation.
Keywords: perfect, Latin, roofing, Standard Average European, sacral stamp, Charlemagne Sprachbund, Boethius, Alfred, Chaucer, Elizabeth I
Article outline
  • 1.Standard Average European: Explaining the distribution
  • 2.The distribution of the have perfect
  • 3.Christian Latin and the sacral stamp of Greek
  • 4.Carolingian Latin
    • 4.1 have perfects in Carolingian Latin
    • 4.2Deponents and be perfects in Carolingian Latin
  • 5.Latin influence on Late Middle and Early Modern English
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations of languages
  • References
Published online: 30 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00025.dri
References (24)
References
Amenta, Luisa. 2003. Perifrasi aspettuali in greco e in latino: origini e grammaticalizzazioni. Milano: Francoangeli.Google Scholar
Blatt, Franz. 1957. “Latin influence on European syntax.” Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 111: 33–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carey, Kathleen. 1995. “Subjectification and the development of the English perfect.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 83–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ceglia, Luca. 1998. “L’evoluzione della costruzione perifrastica verbale nel greco del nuovo testamento.” Archivio Glottologico Italiano 831: 20–44.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2011. “Quantitative explorations of the world-wide distribution of rare characteristics, or: the exceptionality of northwestern European languages.” In Expecting the unexpected: Exceptions in grammar, ed. by Horst J. Simon, and Heike Wiese, 411–431. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen and Viveka Velupillai. 2013. “Perfects.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL])
Drinka, Bridget. 2011. “The sacral stamp of Greek: Periphrastic constructions in New Testament translations of Latin, Gothic, and Old Church Slavonic.” In Indo-European syntax and pragmatics: Contrastive approaches, ed. by Eirik Welo. Oslo Studies in Language 3 (3): 41–73.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Sources of auxiliation in the perfects of Europe.” In On multiple source constructions in language change, ed. by Freek van de Velde, Hendrik De Smet, and Lobke Ghesquière. Studies in Language 371: 597–643. (Republished as Volume 79 of Benjamins Current Topics Series, ed. by Hendrik De Smet, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde. 2015, 129–174).Google Scholar
. 2017. Language contact in Europe: The periphrastic perfect through history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flobert, Pierre. 1975. Les verbes déponents latins des origins à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. “How young is Standard Average European?” Language Sciences 201: 271–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “The European linguistic area: Standard Average European.” In Language typology and change. Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien. La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques, ed. by Haspelmath, Martin, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Worfgang Raible. Vol. 21, 1492–1510. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Herman, József. 2000. Vulgar Latin. (translation by Roger Wright of Le latin vulgaire, Paris, 1967). University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Johannisson, Ture. 1945. Hava och vara. Som tempusbildande hjälpverb i de nordiska språken. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup/Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce. 1977. The early versions of the New Testament: Their origin, transmission, and limitations. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKitterick, Rosamond. 2008. Charlemagne: The formation of a European identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norberg, Dag. 1943. Syntaktische Forschungen auf dem Gebiete des Spätlateins und des Frühen Mittellateins. Uppsala: Lundequistiska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Psaltes, Stamatios B. 1913. Grammatik der Byzantinischen Chroniken. Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Roy, Joseph, and Bridget Drinka. (In preparation). “Expansion of the perfect in Late Middle and Early Modern English: Motivations and Explanations.”
Thielmann, P. 1885. “Habere mit dem Part. Perf. Pass. Archiv für lateinische Lexicographie und Grammatik 21: 372–423, 509–549.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf. 2000. “On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe.” Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, ed. by Östen Dahl, 264–305. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan (ed.). 1998. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L. 1956. Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, ed. by John B. Carroll. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wifstrand, Albert. 2005. “Greek prose style. An historical survey.” In Epochs and styles. Selected writings on the New Testament, Greek language and Greek culture in the post-classical era, ed. by Lars Rydbeck, and Stanley E. Porter, 81–110. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar