Cover not available
Article published In:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 122–134

Strange sounds, familiar words

Interlingual decoding from a CxG perspective

| Kiel University
When communicating across closely related languages or varieties (e.g. in interdialectal communication or in regions such as Mainland Scandinavia), speakers have to learn how to decode words that show partial phonological differences from the equivalents in their L1. Although contact situations like these are rather common, interlingual decoding has scarcely been addressed in the CxG literature. As a contribution to this field of research, the paper discusses how (a particular stage in) emerging receptive multilingualism can be modelled from a CxG perspective. Specifically, it deals with the idea that repeated interlingual decoding generates partially schematic cross-linguistic constructions mirroring the speaker’s knowledge about sound correspondences, as suggested by Diasystematic Construction Grammar (Höder 2019).
Keywords: Diasystematic Construction Grammar, receptive multilingualism, decoding, phonology, submorphemic level, Scandinavian languages
Article outline
  • 1.Learning to decode across linguistic boundaries
  • 2.An ordinary (but underinvestigated) phenomenon
  • 3.Perspective and research questions
  • 4.Diasystematic construction grammar
  • 5.Example analysis
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00040.hag
References (22)
References
Bannert, Robert. 1981. “Referat av diskussionen i sektionen Talperceptionsforskning och nordisk hörförståelse [Report on the discussion in the section Spoken Language Perception and Nordic listening comprehension].” In Internordisk språkförståelse: Föredrag och diskussioner vid ett symposium på Rungstedgaard utanför Köpenhamn den 24–26 mars 1980, anordnat av Sekretariatet för Nordiskt Kulturellt Samarbete vid Nordiska Ministerrådet [Internordic speech comprehension: Presentations and discussions at a symposium at Rungstedgaard outside Copenhagen on March 24–26, 1980, commissioned by Sekretariatet för Nordiskt Kulturellt Samarbete at Nordiska Ministerrådet ], ed. by Claes-Christian Elert, 37–45. Umeå: Universitetet i Umeå.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt. 1995. “Semikommunikation und semiotische Strategien. Bausteine zu einem Modell für die Verständigung im Norden zur Zeit der Hanse.” In Niederdeutsch und die skandinavischen Sprachen, vol. 21, ed. by Kurt Braunmüller, 35–70. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
. 2008. On the Relevance of Receptive Multilingualism in a Globalised World: Theory, History and Evidence from Today’s Scandinavia. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg, Sonderforschungsgebiet Mehrsprachigkeit.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof, and Katarina Lundin Åkesson. 2005. Håller språket ihop Norden? En forskningsrapport om ungdomars förståelse av danska, svenska och norska [Does language hold the North together? A research report on adolescents’ comprehension skills in Danish, Swedish and Norwegian]. Copenhagen: Nordiska Ministerrådet. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., and Stefanie Wulff. 2019. “Cognitive Approaches to L2 Acquisition.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ed. by John W. Schwieter, and Alessandro G. Benati, 41–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2019. Explain Me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte, and Renée van Bezooijen. 2013. “Explaining Danish-Swedish Asymmetric Word Intelligibility. An Error Analysis.” In Phonetics in Europe: Perception and Production, ed. by Charlotte Gooskens, and Renée van Bezooijen, 59–82. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2019. “Higher-order Schemas in Morphology: What They Are, How They Work, and Where to Find Them.” Word Structure 12 (3): 261–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höder, Steffen. 2018. “Grammar is Community-specific: Background and Basic Concepts of Diasystematic Construction Grammar.” In Constructions in Contact: Constructional Perspectives on Contact Phenomena in Germanic Languages, ed. by Hans C. Boas, and Steffen Höder, 37–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Phonological Schematicity in Multilingual Constructions: A Diasystematic Perspective on Lexical Form.” Word Structure 12 (3): 334–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höder, Steffen, Julia Prentice, and Sofia Tingsell. Forthc. “Acquisition of Additional Languages as Reorganization in the Multilingual Constructicon.” In Constructions in Contact 2. Language Change, Multilingual Practices, and Additional Language Acquisition, ed. by Hans C. Boas, and Steffen Höder. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Klein, Horst G., and Tilbert D. Stegmann. 2000. EuroComRom – Die sieben Siebe. Romanische Sprachen sofort lesen können. 2nd ed. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
Möller, Robert, and Ludger Zeevaert. 2015. “Investigating Word Recognition in Intercomprehension: Methods and Findings.” Linguistics 53 (2): 313–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 1996. “Hebb’s Concept of Cell Assemblies and the Psychophysiology of Word Processing.” Psychophysiology 33 (4): 317–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandøy, Helge. 2005. “The Typological Development of the Nordic Languages I: Phonology.” In The Nordic Languages. An International Handbook of the North Germanic Languages, vol. 21, ed. by Oskar Bandle, Kurt Braunmüller, Ernst Håkon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann, and Ulf Teleman, 1852–1871. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Heuven, Vincent J. 2008. “Making Sense of Strange Sounds: (Mutual) Intelligibility of Related Language Varieties. A Review.” International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2 (1–2): 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, Jan. 2016. “The Early Learning of Interlingual Correspondence Rules in Receptive Multilingualism.” International Journal of Bilingualism 20 (5): 580–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, Marilyn, and William Croft. 2007. “Phonological Development: Toward a ‘Radical’ Templatic Phonology.” Linguistics 45 (4): 683–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1954. “Is a Structural Dialectology Possible?” Word 101: 388–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1964. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. 3rd ed. London: Mouton.Google Scholar
Zeldes, Amir. 2012. Productivity in Argument Selection: From Morphology to Syntax. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Höder, Steffen
2023. Chapter 4. The Devil is in the schema. In Constructional Approaches to Nordic Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 37], ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.