Article published In:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 345356
References (23)
References
Bryer, Jason. 2019. likert: Analysis and Visualization of Likert Items. R-script available at <[URL]> (last checked 21/10/2020)
Dahl, Östen. 2001. “Inflationary Effects in Language and Elsewhere.” In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan L. Bybee, and Paul J. Hopper, 471–480. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
d’Avis, Franz, and Rita Finkbeiner (eds). 2019. Expressivität im Deutschen. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Wit, Astrid, Peter Petré, and Frank Brisard. 2020. “Standing out with the Progressive.” Journal of Linguistics 56 (3): 479–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit. 2002. “Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: a Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21 (2). 151–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Alex D. 2020. Ibex Farm. Available at <[URL]> (last checked 21/10/2020)
Eitelmann, Matthias, and Dagmar Haumann (eds.). In prep. Extravagant Morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Günther, Christine, Sven Kotowski, and Ingo Plag. 2020. “Phrasal Compounds Can Have Adjectival Heads: Evidence from English.” English Language and Linguistics 24 (1): 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. “Why Is Grammaticalization Irreversible?Linguistics 37 (6): 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hein, Katrin. 2017. “Modeling the Properties of German Phrasal Compounds within a Usage-Based Constructional Approach.” In Further Investigations into the Nature of Phrasal Compounding, ed. by Carola Trips, and Jaklin Kornfilt, 119–148. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, Osamu. 2014. “The Nature of Speaker Creativity in Linguistic Innovation.” In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change, ed. by Evie Coussé, and Ferdinand von Mengden, 147–166. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kempf, Luise, and Stefan Hartmann. 2018. “Schema Unification and Morphological Productivity: A Diachronic Perspective.” In The Construction of Words. Advances in Construction Morphology, ed. by Geert E. Booij, 441–474. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. forthcoming. “What’s Extravagant about be-sandaled Feet? Morphology, Semantics and Pragmatics of German Pseudo-Participles.” In Extravagant morphology, ed. by Matthias Eitelmann, and Dagmar Haumann. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lensch, Anke. 2018. “ Fixer-Uppers. Reduplication in the Derivation of Phrasal Verbs.” In Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, and Ulrike Freywald, 158–181. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “The Extravagant Progressive: An Experimental Corpus Study on the History of Emphatic [be Ving].” English Language and Linguistics 21 (2): 227–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Manual. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg, and Franziska Günther. 2016. “Toward a Unified Socio-Cognitive Framework for Salience in Language.” Frontiers in Psychology 71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Tobias, and Stefan Hartmann. 2020. “Attack of the Snowclones: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Extravagant Formulaic Patterns.” Paper presented at the UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Birmingham, July 27–29.
Zima, Elisabeth, and Geert Brône. 2015. “Cognitive Linguistics and Interactional Discourse: Time to Enter into Dialogue.” Language and Cognition 7 (4): 485–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M., and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1987. “Plain Morphology and Expressive Morphology.” Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 131: 330–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

HARTMANN, STEFAN & TOBIAS UNGERER
2024. Attack of the snowclones: A corpus-based analysis of extravagant formulaic patterns. Journal of Linguistics 60:3  pp. 599 ff. DOI logo
Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Belén López Meirama
2024.  Vete a freír cristales . Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Pleyer, Michael & Stefan Hartmann
2024. Cognitive Linguistics and Language Evolution, DOI logo
Höder, Steffen
2023. Chapter 4. The Devil is in the schema. In Constructional Approaches to Nordic Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 37],  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Norde, Muriel & Graeme Trousdale
2023. Issues in Diachronic Construction Morphology. Constructions and Frames 15:2  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches, DOI logo
Hartmann, Stefan
2021. Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Book reviews. Yearbook of Phraseology 13:1  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.