Some concepts — and hence the thoughts that contain them — are relatively ineffable. Some literary communication nevertheless
attempts to eff these concepts. This article is interested in the nature of such concepts and the extent to which pragmatics can
deal with them. I discuss the idea, familiar from Relevance Theory and developed in Carston (1996; forthcoming), that pragmatic
inferencing is involved in on-line ad hoc concept construction, certainly in the case of concept narrowing, but
also possibly in the case of concept loosening. I then discuss the relative effability of non-lexicalised concepts, borrowing from
Sperber and Wilson (1998) and focussing on phenomenal concepts (or concepts with a significant phenomenal component). I then
define poetic thoughts as thoughts containing such concepts.
2021. Tell me what it feels like”: On the verbal interface of the phenomenal. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 72:3 ► pp. 723 ff.
Dominicy, Marc
2019. Metaphor, Metonymy, and Personification in the Language of Robotics. In Wording Robotics [Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 130], ► pp. 33 ff.
Kolaiti, Patricia
2017. The curse of the perceptual: a case from kinaesthesia. Journal of Literary Semantics 46:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
Kolaiti, Patricia
2019. The Limits of Expression,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.