Relevance Theory and the use of voice in poetry
This article explores the extent to which the Relevance Theory concepts of interpretive and echoic use can help to explain the
complexities of the use of voice in poetry. Echoic use in Relevance Theory is a sub-type of interpretive use, a use which can
allow a speaker to communicate one of many possible attitudes towards a proposition, ranging from endorsement through
disapproval to ridicule. My argument is that this model could be extremely powerful in accounting for the differences and
relationships between perceived poets’/authors’ views and views presented directly in literary works. This approach goes some
way towards integrating the study of poetry into a general account of communication. The article develops these arguments by
using the Relevance Theory model in analysing the use of voice in a selection of poems by Dorothy Parker, Robert Browning,
John Keats, Gerard Manley Hopkins, Fleur Adcock and Tony Harrison, and raises the question of whether all poetry might be
considered interpretive.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Wharton, Tim
2016.
That bloody so-and-so has retired: Expressives revisited.
Lingua 175-176
► pp. 20 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.