Computational construction grammar and constructional change
References (77)
Arbib, Michael. 2012. How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, and Tom Schoenemann. 2009. “Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper.” Language Learning 59(s1): 1–26.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beuls, Katrien and Luc Steels. 2013. “Agent-Based Models of Strategies for the Emergence and Evolution of Grammatical Agreement.” PLoS ONE 8 (3): e58960. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, Hans C. and Ivan A. Sag (eds). 2012. Sign-based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bod, Rens. 2009. “Constructions at Work or at Rest?.” Cognitive Linguistics 20 (1): 129–134. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Cognition, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow Essex: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daelemans, Walter, Antal van den Bosch, and Jakub Zavrel. 1999. “Forgetting Exceptions is Harmful in Language Learning.” Machine Learning 34 (1/3): 1143. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daems, Jocelyne, Eline Zenner, Kris Heylen, Dirk Speelman, and Hubert Cuyckens (eds). 2015. Change of Paradigms – New Paradoxes: Recontextualizing Language and Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, Holger. 2015. “Usage-Based Construction Grammar.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Ewa Dabrowska and Dagmar Divjak, 295–321. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dik, Simon C. 1980. Studies in Functional Grammar. London: Academic.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dunn, Michael, Simon J. Greenhill, C. Levinson, Stephen, and Russel D. Gray. 2011. “Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals.” Nature 4731: 79–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dunn, Michael, Angela Terrill, Ger Reesink, Robert A. Foley, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2005. “Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history.” Science 309 (5743): 2072–2075. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. 1988. “The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”.” In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 35–55. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language 64 (3): 501–538. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1985. Paradigm and Paradox: Explorations Into a Paradigmatic Theory of Meaning and its Epistemological Background. Leuven: Leuven University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glynn, Dylan and Kerstin Fischer (eds). 2010. Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago UP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E., Devin M. Casenhiser, and Nitya Sethuraman. 2004. “Learning Argument Structure Generalizations.” Cognitive Linguistics 15 (3): 289–316. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gray, Russel D. and Quentin D. Atkinson. 2003. “Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin.” Nature 4261: 435–439. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, Stefan Th. 2015. “The Role of Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus and Experimental Data on (Relative) Frequency and Contingency of Words and Constructions.” In Change of Paradigms – New Paradoxes: Recontextualizing Language and Linguistics, ed. by Jocelyne Daems, Eline Zenner, Kris Heylen, Dirk Speelman, and Hubert Cuyckens, 311–325. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, John T. 2003. “The Information Conveyed by Words in Sentences.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32 (2): 101–123. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, David and Dan Klein. 2010. “Finding Cognate Groups Using Phylogenies.” In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1030–1039. Uppsala: ACL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, Context and Text: Aspects ofLanguage in a Social Semiotic Perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harnad, Stevan. 1990. “The Symbol Grounding Problem.” Physica D 421: 335–346. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heggarty, Paul, Warren Maguire, and April McMahon. 2010. “Splits or waves? Trees or webs? How divergence measures and network analysis can unravel language histories.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 365: 38293843.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holland, John. 2006. “Studying Complex Adaptive Systems.” Journal ofSystems Science and Complexity 19 (1): 1–8. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollmann, Willem B. and Anna Siewierska. 2011. “The Status of Frequency, Schemas, and Identity in Cognitive Sociolinguistics: A Case Study on Definite Article Reduction.” Cognitive Linguistics 221: 25–54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul. 1987. “Emergent grammar.” In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Jon Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis, and Hana Filip, 139–157. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul and Elizabeth Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hurford, James. 1989. “Biological Evolution of the Saussurean Sign as a Component of the Language Acquisition Device.” Lingua 77 (2): 187–222. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaeger, T. Florian and Harry Tily. 2011. “On Language ‘Utility’: Processing Complexity and Communicative Efficiency.” WIREs: Cognitive Science 2 (3): 323–335. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansen, Mark K. and Thomas J. Palmeri. 2002. “Are There Representational Shifts During Category Learning?.” Cognitive Psychology 451: 482–553. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jurafsky, Dan. 1996. “A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation.” Cognitive Science 201: 137–194. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kay, Paul and Charles J. Fillmore. 1999. “Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y? Construction.” Language 751: 1–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirby, Simon. 2002. “Natural Language from Artificial Life.” Artificial Life 8 (2): 185–215. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kondrak, Grzegorz. 2002. Algorithms for Language Reconstruction. Ph. D. thesis, University of Toronto.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William. 2000. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. “A Dynamic Usage-Based Model.” In Usage-Based Models ofLanguage, ed. by Michael Barlow and Suzanne Kemmer, 1–63. Chicago: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieven, Elena. 2009. “Developing Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 20 (1): 191–199. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nurnberg, Geoffrey, Ivan A. Sag, and Thomas Wasow. 1994. “Idioms.” Language 701: 491–538. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perek, Florent. 2015. Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar, Volume 17 of Constructional Approaches to Language. John Benjamins: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pijpops, Dirk, Katrien Beuls, and Freek Van de Velde. 2015. “The Rise of the Verbal Weak Inflection in Germanic: An agent-Based Model.” Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal 51: 81–102.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pleyer, Michael and Nicolas Lindner. 2014. “Constructions, Construal and Cooperation in the Evolution of Language.” In The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference, ed. by Erica A. Cartmill, Sean Roberts, Heidi Lyn, and Hannah Cornish, 244–251. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rice, Sally and John Newman (eds). 2010. Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research. Stanford: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, Eleanor and Barbara B. Lloyd (eds). 1978. Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneider, Nathan and Reut Tsarfaty. 2013. “Book Review: Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar.” Computational Linguistics 39 (2): 447–453. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, Andrew D.M. 2014. “Models of Language Evolution and Change.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 5 (3): 281–293.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spranger, Michael. 2013. “Evolving Grounded Spatial Language Strategies.” KI – Künstliche Intelligenz 27 (2): 97–106. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steels, Luc. 1995. “A Self-Organizing Spatial Vocabulary.” Artificial Life 2 (2): 319–332. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steels, Luc. 2000. “Language as a Complex Adaptive System.” In Proceedings of PPSN VI: Lecture notes in Computer Science, ed. by Mark Schoenauer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 17–26. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steels, Luc. 2004. “Constructivist Development of Grounded Construction Grammars.” In Proceedings 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ed. by Walter Daelemans, 9–19. Barcelona: ACL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steels, Luc. 2015. The Talking Heads Experiment: Origins of Words and Meanings, Volume 1 of Computational Models of Language Evolution. Berlin: Language Science Press. Open access at [URL]. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Steels, Luc and Eörs Szathmáry. 2016. “Fluid Construction Grammar as a Biological System.” Linguistics Vanguard 2 (1). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steiner, Lydia, Peter F. Stadler, and Michael Cysouw. 2011. “A Pipeline for Computational Historical Linguistics.” Language Dynamics and Change 1 (1): 89127. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language. A Usage Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. “Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks.” In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, ed. by Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman, and Gijsbert Rutten, Volume 11, 141–179. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Trijp, Remi. 2010a. “Grammaticalization and Semantic Maps: Evidence from Artificial Language Evolution.” Linguistic Discovery 8 (1): 310–326. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Trijp, Remi. 2010b. “Strategy Competition in the Evolution of Pronouns: A Case-Study of Spanish Leísmo, Laísmo and Loísmo.” In The Evolution of Language (EVOLANG 8), ed. by Andrew D.M. Smith, Marieke Schouwstra, Bart de Boer, and Kenny Smith, 336–343. Singapore: World Scientific. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Trijp, Remi. 2013b. “Linguistic Assessment Criteria for Explaining Language Change: A Case Study on Syncretism in German Definite Articles.” Language Dynamics and Change 3 (1): 105–132. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Trijp, Remi. 2015. “Cognitive vs. Generative Construction Grammar: The Case of Coercion and Argument Structure.” Cognitive Linguistics 261: 613–632. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change.” In Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium, ed. by Winfred P. Lehman and Yakov Malkiel, 97–195. Austin: University of Texas.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wichmann, Søren, André Müller, and Viveka Velupillai. 2010. “Homelands of the world’s language families: A quantitative approach.” Diachronica 27 (2): 247276.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Pijpops, Dirk, Isabeau De Smet & Freek Van de Velde
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.