Cover not available
Part of
Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning
Edited by Edith Kaan and Theres Grüter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 12] 2021
► pp. 25–46

Chapter 2
Automaticity and prediction in non-native language comprehension

 | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
 | University of Edinburgh
Some evidence suggests that prediction is more limited in non-native language (L2) than native language (L1) comprehension. We evaluate the hypothesis that prediction is limited in L2 because prediction is largely non-automatic. We examine whether the subprocesses involved in prediction are unconscious, unintentional, efficient and uncontrollable (Bargh, 1994) to understand the extent to which prediction is automatic in L1 and L2. To unpack the subprocesses in prediction, we draw on Pickering and Garrod’s (2013) proposal that people primarily use their production system for prediction, as well as a more automatic association-based mechanism. We conclude that at least some of the subprocesses in prediction are not fully automatic and suggest that these non-automatic processes can interfere with prediction in L2.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Graded view of automaticity
  • A production-based model of prediction
  • Automaticity of prediction in L1
  • Automaticity of prediction in L2
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 22 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.12.02ito
References (76)
References
Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes; Applications (pp. 1–40). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bobb, S. C., Kroll, J. F., & Jackson, C. N. (2015). Lexical constraints in second language learning: Evidence on grammatical gender in German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 502–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89(1), 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2017). Goals and strategies influence lexical prediction during sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 203–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H. (2009). Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 1029–1040. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chun, E., & Kaan, E. (2019). L2 prediction during complex sentence processing. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 3(2), 203–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2008). Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: New evidence from dual-task experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 886–899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corps, R. E., Brooke, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2021). Do comprehenders predict from their own perspective? Manuscript in preparationGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Heij, W., & La Navarrete, E. (2006). The dynamics of bilingual lexical access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curcic, M., Andringa, S., & Kuiken, F. (2019). The role of awareness and cognitive aptitudes in L2 predictive language processing. Language Learning, 69, 42–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, M., & Kormos, J. (2012). The effect of dual task demands and proficiency on second language speech production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 782–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retreival in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dijkgraaf, A., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2017). Predicting upcoming information in native-language and non-native-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(5), 917–930. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Prediction and integration of semantics during L2 and L1 listening. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(7), 881–900. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 353–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fayol, M., Largy, P., & Lemaire, P. (1994). Cognitive overload and orthographic errors: When cognitive overload enhances subject–verb agreement errors. A study in French written language. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 47(2), 437–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1187–1199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 516–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2011). Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1–L2 syntactic similarity. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 379–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A. (2014). Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1461–1469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., Ruiz-Tada, E., & Costa, A. (2015). How do you know I was about to say “book”? Anticipation processes affect speech processing and lexical recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(6), 768–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Anticipation processes in L2 speech comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and lexical recognition task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 213–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gambi, C., Pickering, M. J., & Rabagliati, H. (2016). Beyond associations: Sensitivity to structure in pre-schoolers’ linguistic predictions. Cognition, 157, 340–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Automaticity of language production in monologue and dialogue. In A. S. Meyer, L. R. Wheeldon, & A. Krott (Eds.), Automaticity and control in language processing (pp. 1–20). Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grossi, G. (2006). Relatedness proportion effects on masked associative priming: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 43(1), 21–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., Lau, E., & Ling, W. (2020). How classifiers facilitate predictive processing in L1 and L2 Chinese: The role of semantic and grammatical cues. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(2), 221–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Barkhuysen, P. N. (2006). Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(1–3), 181–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Moors, A. (2017). On the automaticity of language processing. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 201–225). American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120(4), 901–931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29(1), 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Semantics and morphosyntax in predictive L2 sentence processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(3), 277–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 32(2), 277–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). The bilingual mental lexicon in L2 sentence processing. Second Language, 17, 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoversten, L. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2020). Zooming in on zooming out: Partial selectivity and dynamic tuning of bilingual language control during reading. Cognition, 195, 104118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huettig, F., & Guerra, E. (2019). Effects of speech rate, preview time of visual context, and participant instructions reveal strong limits on prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1706, 196–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2016). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 80–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18(3), 193–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, A., Corley, M., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 251–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, A., Corley, M., Pickering, M. J., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 157–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2017a). On predicting form and meaning in a second language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(4), 635–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). How robust are prediction effects in language comprehension? Failure to replicate article-elicited N400 effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 954–965. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, A., Nguyen, H. T. T., & Knoeferle, P. (2021). Anticipatory use of verb and classifier constraints in Vietnamese-German bilinguals. Manuscript in preparationGoogle Scholar
Ito, A., Pickering, M. J., & Corley, M. (2018). Investigating the time-course of phonological prediction in native and non-native speakers of English: A visual world eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2008). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 277–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E. (2014). Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(2), 257–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kukona, A., Braze, D., Johns, C. L., Mencl, W. E., Van Dyke, J. A., Magnuson, J. S., Pugh, K. R., Shankweiler, D. P., & Tabor, W. (2016). The real-time prediction and inhibition of linguistic outcomes: Effects of language and literacy skill. Acta Psychologica, 171, 72–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kukona, A., Fang, S. Y., Aicher, K. A., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011). The time course of anticipatory constraint integration. Cognition, 119(1), 23–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(3), 326–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, E. F., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single-word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(3), 484–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2010). Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 447–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J. R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitsugi, S., & MacWhinney, B. (2016). The use of case marking for predictive processing in second language Japanese. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 19–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moors, A. (2016). Automaticity: Componential, causal, and mechanistic explanations. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 263–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nicenboim, B., Vasishth, S., & Rösler, F. (2020). Are words pre-activated probabilistically during sentence comprehension? Evidence from new data and a bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using publicly available data. Neuropsychologia, 142, 107427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S., Bartolozzi, F., Kogan, V., Ito, A., Mézière, D., Barr, D. J., Rousselet, G. a, Ferguson, H. J., Busch-Moreno, S., Fu, X., Tuomainen, J., Kulakova, E., Husband, E. M., … Huettig, F. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. ELife, 7, e33468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. E., Grüter, T., & Borovsky, A. (2018). Vocabulary size and native speaker self-identification influence flexibility in linguistic prediction among adult bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(6), 1439–1469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002–1044. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 105–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1981). Does activation really spread? Psychological Review, 88(5), 454–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2009). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 371–388). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing, II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10(3), 281–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bergen, G., & Flecken, M. (2017). Putting things in new places: Linguistic experience modulates the predictive power of placement verb semantics. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 26–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(6), 209–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Bosch, Jasmijn E. & Francesca Foppolo
2024. Prediction during spoken language processing in monolingual and multilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:4 ► pp. 512 ff. DOI logo
Fang, Shaohua & Zhiyi Wu
2024. Syntactic prediction in L2 learners: evidence from English disjunction processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
Fernandez, Leigh B, Lauren V Hadley, Aybora Koç, John CB Gamboa & Shanley EM Allen
2024. Is there a cost when predictions are not met? A VWP study investigating L1 and L2 speakers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology DOI logo
Ito, Aine
2024. Effects of Task Instructions on Predictive Eye Movements and Word Recognition During Second Language Sentence Comprehension. Language Learning DOI logo
Karaca, Figen, Susanne Brouwer, Sharon Unsworth & Falk Huettig
2024. Morphosyntactic predictive processing in adult heritage speakers: effects of cue availability and spoken and written language experience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 39:1 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Nguyen, Hoan & Theres Grüter
2024. Facilitative use of classifiers in heritage Vietnamese. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Norman, Tal & Tamar Degani
2024. Context effects in the L2: Evidence for compensatory mechanisms. International Journal of Bilingualism 28:3 ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Rathcke, Tamara, Simone Falk & Simone Dalla Bella
2024. Why Does Speech Sometimes Sound Like Song? Exploring the Role of Music-Related Priors in the “Speech-to-Song Illusion”. Music & Science 7 DOI logo
Sagarra, Nuria, Laura Fernández‐Arroyo, Cristina Lozano‐Argüelles & Joseph V. Casillas
2024. Unraveling the Complexities of Second Language Lexical Stress Processing: The Impact of First Language Transfer, Second Language Proficiency, and Exposure. Language Learning 74:3 ► pp. 574 ff. DOI logo
Allal-Sumoto, Takara Kenza, Kiyofumi Miyoshi & Hiroaki Mizuhara
2023. The effect of productive vocabulary knowledge on second language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Alzahrani, Alaa
2023. What is the next structure? Guessing enhances L2 syntactic learning in a syntactic priming task. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Ding, Jinfeng, Yuping Zhang, Panpan Liang & Xiaoqing Li
2023. Modulation of working memory capacity on predictive processing during language comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 38:8 ► pp. 1133 ff. DOI logo
Moreno, Eva M., Clara D. Martin & Alice Foucart
2023. Lexical anticipation in bilinguals. In Bilingualism through the Prism of Psycholinguistics [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 17], ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Sagarra, Nuria & Joseph V. Casillas
2023. Practice beats age: co-activation shapes heritage speakers’ lexical access more than age of onset. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Schlenter, Judith
2023. Prediction in bilingual sentence processing: How prediction differs in a later learned language from a first language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yiguang, Florian Hintz, Junying Liang & Falk Huettig
2022. Prediction in challenging situations: Most bilinguals can predict upcoming semantically-related words in their L1 source language when interpreting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25:5 ► pp. 801 ff. DOI logo
Ito, Aine & Hiromu Sakai
2021. Everyday Language Exposure Shapes Prediction of Specific Words in Listening Comprehension: A Visual World Eye-Tracking Study. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.