Cover not available
Part of
Cross-language Influences in Bilingual Processing and Second Language Acquisition
Edited by Irina Elgort, Anna Siyanova-Chanturia and Marc Brysbaert
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 16] 2023
► pp. 74–99

Chapter 4
Cross-language influences in the acquisition of L2 and L3 phonology

ORCID logo | University of California, Santa Cruz
This chapter synthesises some of the main findings from research investigating cross-language influence (CLI) in Second Language (L2) and Third Language (L3) speech learning. In addition to an overview of the findings that have gathered growing consensus in the fields of L2 and L3 phonology, and how these results have been tested and explained in various theories of L2 speech, this chapter points to methodological and theoretical considerations discussed in three areas that hold promise for future research in L2 and L3 speech: (i) the relationship between L2/L3 speech perception and L2/L3 speech production, (ii) the acquisition of phonological processes vs. phonological contrasts, and (iii) the distinction between static and dynamic phonetic interactions in L2 and L3 speech.
Keywords: bilingual speech, trilingual speech, L2/L3 acquisition, phonology, speech perception, speech production, phonological processes, phonological contrasts, static phonetic interactions, dynamic phonetic interactions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cross-language influences in L2 and L3 phonological acquisition
    • 2.1The acquisition of L2 phonology
    • 2.2The acquisition of L3 phonology
  • 3.Theoretical frameworks
    • 3.1The Speech Learning Model (SLM) and the Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r)
    • 3.2The Second Language Linguistic Perception model (L2LP)
    • 3.3The Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM) and the Perceptual Assimilation Model of Second Language Learning (PAM-L2)
  • 4.Future directions in L2 and L3 speech learning research
    • 4.1The relationship between L2 and L3 speech perception and production
    • 4.2Acquisition of phonological processes vs. phonological contrasts in L2 and L3 speech
    • 4.3Static and dynamic interactions in L2 and L3 speech
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • References
Published online: 1 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.16.04ame
References (109)
References
Ambridge, B. (2020). Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First Language, 40(5/6), 509–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amengual, M. (2012) Interlingual influence in bilingual speech: Cognate status effect in a continuum of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 517–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a). Cross-linguistic influence in the bilingual mental lexicon: Evidence of cognate effects in the phonetic production and processing of a vowel contrast. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). The perception and production of language-specific mid-vowel contrasts: Shifting the focus to the bilingual individual in early language input conditions. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(2), 133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016c). Acoustic correlates of the Spanish tap-trill contrast: Heritage and L2 Spanish speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 13(2), 88–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Asymmetrical interlingual influence in the production of Spanish and English laterals as a result of competing activation in bilingual language processing. Journal of Phonetics, 69, 12–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Type of early bilingualism and its effect on the acoustic realization of allophonic variants: Early sequential and simultaneous bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(5), 954–970. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). The acoustic realization of language-specific phonological categories despite dynamic cross-linguistic influence in bilingual and trilingual speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149(2), 1271–1284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amengual, M., & Chamorro, P. (2015). The effects of language dominance in the perception and production of the Galician mid vowel contrasts. Phonetica, 72(4), 207–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amengual, M., & Simonet, M. (2020). Language dominance does not always predict cross-linguistic interactions in bilingual speech production. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 10(6), 141–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amengual, M., Meredith, L., & Panelli, T. (2019). Static and dynamic phonetic interactions in the L2 and L3 acquisition of Japanese velar voiceless stops. In S. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 964–968). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., & Kroos, C. (2011). Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 558–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O. -S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning. In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–24). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56(s1), 9–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blank, C. A., & Zimmer, M. C. (2009). A transferência fonético-fonológica L2 (francês)–L3 (inglês): Um estudo de caso. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 17(1), 207–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohn, O. S. (1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279–304). York Press.Google Scholar
Bosch, L., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(2), 189–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/ IV: Some effects of perceptual training on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2299–2310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, B., Lemhöfer, K., & Mani, N. (2011). Perceiving unstressed vowels in foreign-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(1), 376–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bullock, B. E., Toribio, A. J., González, V., & Dalola, A. (2006). Language dominance and performance outcomes in bilingual pronunciation. In M. G. O’Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition conference (GASLA) (pp. 9–16). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2017). Testing the Phonological Permeability Hypothesis: L3 phonological effects on L1 versus L2 systems. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 698–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). L3 phonology: An understudied domain. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 33–60) John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Rothman, J. (2010). On L3 acquisition and phonological permeability: A new test case for debates on the mental representation of non-native phonological systems. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48, 275–296.Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Iverson, M. (2018). Third language acquisition. In K. Geeslin (Ed.), Handbook of Spanish linguistics (pp. 737–757). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Wrembel, M. (2016). Investigating the acquisition of phonology in a third language – A state of the science and an outlook for the future. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 395–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2003). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 71–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2019a). Phonetic drift. In M. S. Schmid & B. Köpke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language attrition (pp. 191–203). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2019b). The phonetics of second language learning and bilingualism. In W. F. Katz & P. F. Assman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonetics (pp. 427–447). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Seguí, J. (1989). Limits on bilingualism. Nature, 340, 229–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J. M. (2001). Activation or inhibition? The interaction of L1, L2 and L3 on the language mode continuum. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition (pp. 69–89). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, O., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2010). Phonological neutralization by native and non-native speakers: The case of Russian final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 483–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Domene Moreno, C. (2021). Beyond transfer? The acquisition of an L3 phonology by Turkish-German bilinguals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universität Würzburg.
Domene Moreno, C. & Kabak, B. (Forthcoming). Monolingual-bilingual (non-)convergence in L3 rhythm. In R. Fuchs (Eds.), Speech rhythm in L2 and L3 varieties of English. Springer [Submitted for publication].
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., & Wrembel, M. (2022). Natural Growth Theory of Acquisition (NGTA): Evidence from (mor)phonotactics. In V. Sardegna & A. Jarosz (Eds.). Theoretical and practical perspectives on English pronunciation teaching and research. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. L. (1974). Perception and production in child phonology: The testing of four hypotheses. Journal of Child Language, 1, 205–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elvin J., & Escudero P. (2019) Cross-linguistic influence in second language speech: Implications for learning and teaching. In M. Gutierrez-Mangado, M. Martínez-Adrián, & F. Gallardo-del-Puerto (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence: From empirical evidence to classroom practice. Second language learning and teaching (pp. 1–20). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition. Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O. S. (1989). An instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 35–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O. -S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model. In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning, Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 89, 395–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(3), 1589–1608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2973–2987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Piske, T. (2002). Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 567–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5) 3125–3134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Schirru, C., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2003). Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40, 467–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. A., & Galantucci, B. (2008). The relation of speech perception and speech production. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.). The handbook of speech perception (pp. 633–652). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldrick, M., Runnqvist, E., & Costa, A. (2014). Language switching makes pronunciation less nativelike. Psychological Science, 25(4), 1031–1036. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R”. Neuropsychologia, 9, 317–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 131–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F., & Miller, J. L. (1994). Going in and out of languages: An example of bilingual flexibility. Psychological Science, 5(4), 201–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. (2010). Cross-linguistic influence in L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 19–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarberg, B. (2001). Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production and acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition (pp. 21–41). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huensch, A., & Tremblay, A. (2015). Effects of perceptual phonetic training on the perception and production of second language syllable structure. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A., Fricke, M., & Kroll, J. F. (2016). Cross-language activation begins during speech planning and extends into second language speech. Language Learning, 66(2), 324–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James M. A. (2012) Cross-linguistic influence and transfer of learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., & Polka, L. (1995). Not everyone can tell a “rock” from a “lock”: Assessing individual differences in speech perception. In D. J. Lubinski & R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 297–325). Davies-Black Publishing.Google Scholar
Kartushina, N., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2014). On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kartushina, N., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2016). How and when does the second language influence the production of native speech sounds: A literature review. Language Learning, 66(S2), 155–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecková, R. (2015). Differences in the perception of English vowel sounds by child L2 and L3 learners. In U. Gut, R. Fuchs, & E. -M. Wunder (Eds.). Universal or diverse paths to English phonology (pp. 71–90). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 979–1000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, B., Guion, S. G., & Harada, T. (2006). Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(3),487–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lengeris, A., & Hazan, V. (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels to native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 3757–3768. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llama, R., & Cardoso, W. (2018). Revisiting (non-) native influence in VOT production: Insights from advanced L3 Spanish. Languages, 3(3), 30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llama, R., Cardoso, W., & Collins, L. (2010) The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 39–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llama, R., & López-Morelos, L. P. (2016). VOT production by Spanish heritage speakers in a trilingual context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 444–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llisterri, J., & Poch-Olivé, D. (1987). Phonetic interference in bilingual’s learning of a third language. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 134–147). Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12, 251–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Major, R. C. (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mennen, I. (2015). Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In E. Delais-Roussarie, M. Avanzi, & S. Herment (Eds.), Prosody and language in contact: L2 acquisition, attrition and languages in multilingual situations (pp. 171–188). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Missaglia, F. (2010). The acquisition of L3 English vowels by infant German-Italian bilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 58–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A. M., Jenkins, J., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 331–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, G. (1988). Phonological asymmetry in second-language learning and performance. Language Learning, 38(4), 531–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. J. (2016). The role of code-switching and language context in bilingual phonetic transfer. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 46(3), 263–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onishi, H. (2016). The effect of L2 experience on L3 perception. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 459–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., Flege, J., MacKay, I., & Meador, D. (2002). The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 59, 49–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polka, L. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic and acoustic contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(6), 2961–2977. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringbom, H. (1987). Role of the first language in foreign language learning. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rochet, B. (1995). Perception and production of second-language speech sounds by adults. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 379–410). York Press.Google Scholar
Scovel, T. (1988). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. Newbury House.Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Soto-Faraco, S. (1999). Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals. Cognition, 72, 111–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Echeverría, S., & Bosch L. (2005). The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 240–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, M. (1983). On first language loss in the second language acquirer: Problems of transfer. In S. M. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 222–231). Newbury House.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simonet, M. (2011). Production of a Catalan-specific vowel contrast by early Spanish-Catalan bilinguals. Phonetica, 68, 88–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Phonetic consequences of dynamic cross-linguistic interference in proficient bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 26–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simonet, M., & Amengual, M. (2020). Increased language co-activation leads to enhanced cross-linguistic phonetic convergence. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(2), 208–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. L., Hayes-Harb, R., Bruss, M., & Harker, A. (2009). Production and perception of voicing and devoicing in similar German and English word pairs by native speakers of German. Journal of Phonetics, 37(3), 257–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, W. (2011). Automatic Selective Perception (ASP) of first and second language speech: A working model. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 456–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sypianska, J. (2016). Multilingual acquisition of vowels in L1 Polish, L2 Danish and L3 English. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 476–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsui, R. K. Y., Tong, X., & Chan, C. S. K. (2019). Impact of language dominance on phonetic transfer in Cantonese–English bilingual language switching. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(1), 29–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber-Fox, C. & Neville, H. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Mouton.Google Scholar
Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 295–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2011). Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition of voice onset time. In L. Wai-Sum & E. Zee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 2157–2160). City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
(2014). VOT patterns in the acquisition of third language phonology. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 750–770.Google Scholar
(2015). Cross-linguistic influence in second vs. third language acquisition of phonology. In U. Gut, R. Fuchs & E. Wunder (Ed.), Universal or diverse paths to English phonology (pp.41–70). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wrembel, M., Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Balas, A. (2020). Cross-linguistic interactions in third language acquisition: Evidence from multi-feature analysis of speech perception. Languages, 5(4), 52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wrembel, M., Marecka, M., & Kopecková, R. (2019). Extending perceptual assimilation model to L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 513–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y., Chen, A., Sudhoff, S., & Mok, P. (2019). Third language prosody: Evidence from Cantonese-English-German trilinguals. In S. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 3735–3739). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Amengual, Mark
2024. Phonetics of Early Bilingualism. Annual Review of Linguistics 10:1 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Martínez Vera, Gabriel, Julio César López Otero, Marina Y. Sokolova, Adam Cleveland, Megan Tzeitel Marshall & Liliana Sánchez
2023. Aspectual se and Telicity in Heritage Spanish Bilinguals: The Effects of Lexical Access, Dominance, Age of Acquisition, and Patterns of Language Use. Languages 8:3 ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.