Cover not available
Part of
Language Acquisition in Romance Languages
Edited by Vicenç Torrens
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 18] 2024
► pp. 58–85

Chapter 3
The acquisition of generic null subjects under the Borer-Chomsky conjecture

 | University of São Paulo
This chapter examines how Brazilian Portuguese (BP)-speaking children acquire a critical property associated with partial null-subject languages, generic null subjects. The purpose is to investigate whether the data about the acquisition of generic null subjects are compatible with the idea that parametric variation is caused by the cross-linguistic distribution of features in functional heads (known as the Borer-Chomsky conjecture). To acquire the distribution of (null) subjects, the child should pay close attention to ϕ-features on T and D. Studies have shown that children become sensitive to the presence of verbal inflections and determiners before their first words (Dye et al., 2019), which leads to the prediction that children should not show evidence of parameter misssetting. We found that generic null subjects emerge as early as 1;9 in BP, which is consistent with the prediction of early parameter setting. However, generic null subjects did not appear frequently in spontaneous production and they increase as the child grows older. As generic null subjects are used to talk about rules, patterns and generalizations, not about specific individuals, the production of generic null subjects increases as children’s conversational topics become less egocentric.
Keywords: Borer-Chomsky conjecture, null subject, parameter setting, Brazilian Portuguese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The null-subject parameter
  • 3.Acquiring the null subject system of a PNSL
  • 4.Acquisition of generic null subjects by BP-speaking children
    • 4.1Comprehension
      • 4.1.1Method
      • 4.1.2Results
      • 4.1.3Discussion
    • 4.2Production
      • 4.2.1Method
      • 4.2.2Results
      • 4.2.3Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.18.03ber
References (56)
References
Baker, M. C. (2008). The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.) The limits of syntactic variation. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertolino, K. (2016). Modals and impersonal null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese (Unpublished Manuscript). University of Connecticut.
(2020a). An experimental study on the acquisition of impersonals in Brazilian Portuguese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.
(2020b). Testing children’s knowledge of generic null pronouns. Revista Linguística, 16(1), 146–167.Google Scholar
(2023). A survey on generic impersonal structures in Brazilian Portuguese. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada.Google Scholar
Biberauer, T. (2010). Semi null-subject languages, expletives and expletive pro reconsidered. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan, Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 153–199). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2018). Pro-drop and emergent parameter. In F. Cognola & J. Casalicchio (Eds.), Null subjects in generative grammar: A synchronic and diachronic perspective (pp. 94–136). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Factors 2 and 3: Towards a principled approach. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2019, 45–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(4), 491–504.Google Scholar
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric syntax, case studies in semitic and romance languages. Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bromberg, S., & Wexler, K. (1995). Null subjects in child wh-questions. In C. T Shutze, J. B. Ganger, & K. Broihier (Eds.), Papers in language processing and acquisition. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 26.Google Scholar
Camacho, J. (2013). Null subjects. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. H. (1998). Child acquisition of Quechua morphosyntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Arizona.
Cyrino, S., & Espinal, M. T. (2015). On the structure of bare nominals in Brazilian Portuguese. In J. Smiyh & T. Ihsane (Eds.), Romance Linguistics 2012: Selected papers from the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Cedar City, Utah, 20–22. April 2012 (pp. 215–228). John Benjamins. DOI logo
Dye, C., Kedar, Y., & Lust, B. (2019). From lexical to functional categories: New foundations for the study of language development. First Language, 39(1), 9–32.Google Scholar
Fein, D., Dunn, M., Allen, D., Aram, D., Hall, N., Morris, R., & Wilson, B. (1996). Language and neuropsychological findings. In I. Rapin (Ed.), Preschool children with inadequate communication (pp. 123–154). Mac Keith Press.Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Mueller, J. L., & Oberecker, R. (2011). Precursors to natural grammar learning: Preliminary evidence from 4-month-old infants. PLoS One, 6(3), e17920.Google Scholar
Gilligan, G. M. (1989). A cross-linguistic approach to the pro-drop parameter (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.
Guasti, M. T. (1993). Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: Finite and nonfinite verbs. Language Acquisition, 3(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
(1996). Acquisition of Italian interrogatives. Generative perspectives on language acquisition. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. (1990). Non-overt subjects in diary contexts. In J. Mascaró & M. Nespor (Eds.), Grammar in Progress, GLOW essays for Henk van Riemsdijk (pp. 167–174). Foris.Google Scholar
(1997). Register variation, truncation, and subject omission in English and in French. English Language & Linguistics, 1(2), 233–270.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (2010). Null subject parameters. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan, Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 88–124). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A., & Roberts, I. (2010). Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 1–57). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Springer.Google Scholar
(1991). A reanalysis of null subjects in child language. In J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck, &T. Roeper (Eds.), Theoretical issues in language acquisition (pp. 259–278). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.- J. (2000). Subject/object drop in the acquisition of Korean: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9(4), 325–351.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. J., & Sundara, M. (2021). 6 – month – olds are sensitive to English morphology. Developmental Science, 24(4), e13089.Google Scholar
Levy, Y., & Vainikka, A. (2000). The development of a mixed null subject system: A cross-linguistic perspective with data on the acquisition of Hebrew. Language Acquisition, 8(4), 363–384.Google Scholar
Lopes, R. E. V. (2006). Bare nouns and DP number agreement in the acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese. In N. Sagarra & J. A. Toribio (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 252–262). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Lust, B., & Blume, M. (2016). Research methods in language acquisition: Principles, procedures, and practices. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2014). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Volume II: The database. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L. (1996). Prosody and the roots of parsing. Language and cognitive processes, 11(1–2), 69–106.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
(1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(3), 501–57.Google Scholar
(1994). Early null subjects and root null subjects. In G. H. B. Lust & G. Hermon (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. (2010a). Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2010b). A deletion analysis of null subjects. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan, Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 58–87). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2019). Parameter hierarchies and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santos, R. S., & Scarpa, E. M. (2003). A aquisição da morfologia verbal e sua relação com o acento primário. Letras de Hoje, 38(4).Google Scholar
Santos, R. S. (2005). A aquisição do ritmo em português brasileiro. FAPESP (2003/13565-4).Google Scholar
Shi, R., & Lepage, M. (2008). The effect of functional morphemes on word segmentation in preverbal infants. Developmental Science, 11(3), 407–413.Google Scholar
Shi, R., Werker, J. F., & Cutler, A. (2006). Recognition and representation of function words in English-learning infants. Infancy, 10(2), 187–198.Google Scholar
Simioni, L. (2014). Contra a argumentalidade do singular nu do português brasileiro: Evidência das construções passivas. VI Congreso Internacional de Letras. Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Tek, S., Mesite, L., Fein, D., & Naigles, L. (2014). Longitudinal analyses of expressive language development reveal two distinct language profiles among young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(1), 75–89.Google Scholar
Torn-Leesik, R., & Vija, M. (2012). Acquisition of the impersonal voice by an Estonian child. Journal of Baltic Studies, 43(2), 251–271.Google Scholar
Torrens, V. (1995). The acquisition of inflection in Spanish and Catalan. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, 451–472.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (1991). Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition, 40(1), 21–81.Google Scholar
Vihman, V. A. (2004). Valency reduction in Estonian (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh.
Viitso, T. R. (1997). Fennic. In D. Abondolo (Ed.) The Uralic languages. Routledge.Google Scholar
Vija, M., Torn-Leesik, R., & Pajusalu, R. (2009). Tegumood eesti lapsekeeles. In R. Argus, H. Metslang, M. Langemets, & M.- M. Sepper (Eds.), Eesti rakenduslingvistika uhingu aastaraamat. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 329–344.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Lillo-Martin, D., Best, C. T., & Levitt, A. (1992). Null subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition, 2(3), 221–254.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivation in child grammar. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.) Verb movement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, L., Goad, H., Su, J., Smeets, L., Mortazavinia, M., Garcia, G. D., & Guzzo, N. B. (2017). Prosodic effects on pronoun interpretation in Italian. In M. LaMendola & J. Scott (Eds), BUCLD 41: Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 744–752. Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bertolino, Karina
2024. The Setting of the Null Subject Parameters across (Non-)Null-Subject Languages. Languages 9:8 ► pp. 276 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.