Cover not available
Part of
Non-professional Interpreting and Translation: State of the art and future of an emerging field of research
Edited by Rachele Antonini, Letizia Cirillo, Linda Rossato and Ira Torresi
[Benjamins Translation Library 129] 2017
► pp. 157–175

Chapter 8
From confinement to community service

Migrant inmates mediating between languages and cultures

This paper presents a spin-off study from the research project In MedIO PUER(I), launched at the University of Bologna in 2007 (see Antonini 2010a; Antonini 2010b; Cirillo et al. 2010; Bucaria & Rossato 2010; Antonini this volume), and sets out to investigate the under-researched phenomenon of language and cultural brokering among migrant inmates. In countries such as Italy, where immigration is still a recent experience and resources for institutional interpreting are scarce even in ordinary public contexts, professional language services are virtually non-existent in secluded environments such as prisons. Foreign inmates and jail personnel face linguistic problems that they tend to handle through spontaneous forms of mediation: a convicted migrant, who is fluent in Italian, may act as a mediator between fellow-country inmates with poor knowledge of the host language and jail officers. This form of language and cultural brokering is a common form of ad hoc interpreting that responds to the communication needs of both inmates and detention institutions. This paper sets out to map the phenomenon and to investigate whether this practice has an impact on inmates’ self-perception and rehabilitation process.
Keywords: migrant inmates, ad hoc interpreting, identity, rehabilitation, integration
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of the literature
  • 3.Appalling conditions of inmates in Italian prisons
    • 3.1Crime perception in Italy
    • 3.2Language and cultural mediation in detention centers: A European issue
  • 4.Study objectives and methodology
    • 4.1Research design
    • 4.2The survey
    • 4.3The respondents
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Frequency of occurrence of language brokering practice
    • 5.2Attitudes and feelings towards the language brokering practice
    • 5.3Translation strategies and awareness of the mediator’s role
    • 5.4Identity issues
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.129.08ros
References (33)
References
Aebi Marcelo F. & Natalia Delgrande. 2012. Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Space I-2012. [URL] (last viewed April 7, 2015).
Antonini, Rachele ed. 2010a. Child Language Brokering: Trends and Patterns in Current Research (= mediAzioni 10). [URL] (last viewed March 25, 2015).
. 2010b. “The Study of Child Language Brokering: Past, Current and Emerging Research”. mediAzioni 10. 1–23.Google Scholar
ed. 2014. La mediazione linguistica e culturale non professionale in Italia. Bologna: BUP.Google Scholar
Baixauli-Olmos, Lluís. 2012. “La interpretació al serveis públics des d’una perspectiva ética: La deontologia professional i l’apicació al context penitenciari”. PhD dissertation, Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
. 2013. “A Description of Interpreting in Prisons: Mapping the Setting through an Ethical Lens”. Interpreting in a Changing Landscape. Selected Papers from Critical Link. 6 ed. by Christina Schäffner, Krzysztof Kredens & Yvonne Fowler. 45–60. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Elaine. 2010. “Language Brokering: Practicing Active Citizenship”. mediAzioni 10.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Reconstructing Moral Identities in Memories of Childhood Language Brokering Experiences”. International Migration 51:5. 205–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benucci, Antonella. 2007. “Insegnare italiano L2 in carcere”. Insegnare italiano come lingua seconda in carcere e nei CTP ed. by Gaetana Rossi & Cosimo Scaglioso, 53–73. Firenze: IRRE Toscana.Google Scholar
Bucaria, Chiara & Linda Rossato. 2010. “Former Child Language Brokers: Preliminary Observations on Practice, Attitudes and Relational Aspects”. mediAzioni 10, 239–268.Google Scholar
Caritas-Migrantes. 2010. Immigrazione: dossier statistico 2010-XX rapporto: per una cultura dell’altro. Rome: Idos.Google Scholar
. 2011. Immigrazione: dossier statistico 2011-XXI rapporto: oltre la crisi insieme. Rome: Idos.Google Scholar
. 2012. Immigrazione: dossier statistico 2012-XXII rapporto: “Non sono numeri.” Rome: Idos.Google Scholar
2014a. XXIII Rapporto immigrazione 2013: tra crisi e diritti umani. Perugia: Tau Editrice.Google Scholar
2014b. XXIII Rapporto immigrazione 2013: tra crisi e diritti umani. Sintesi Perugia: Tau Editrice. [URL] (last viewed April 7, 2015).
Carmignani, Serena. 2012. “Carcere e formazione: analisi critica dei progetti per formazione di detenuti in carcere in italia”. Educazione Linguistica Language Education. 1:2. 379–401.Google Scholar
Cirillo Letizia, Ira Torresi & Cristina Valentini 2010. “Institutional Perceptions of Child Language Brokering in Emilia Romagna” mediAzioni 10. 269–296.Google Scholar
Fondazione ISMU. 2011. Diciassettesimo rapporto sulle migrazioni 2011. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Gonnella, Patrizio. 2015. I detenuti stranieri in Italia. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.Google Scholar
Hall, Nigel. 2004. “The Child in the Middle: Agency and Diplomacy in Language Brokering Events”. Claims, Changes and Challenges in Translation Studies ed. by Gyde Hansen, Kirsten Malmkjaer & Daniel Gile, 285–297. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Nigel & Sylvia Sham. 2007. “Language Brokering as Young People’s Work: Evidence from Chinese Adolescents in England”. Language and Education 21:1. 16–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Brian & Bianca Sherwood. 1978. “Translating as an Innate Skill”. Language Interpretation and Communication. New York: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jesuit Refugee Service-Europe. 2010. Becoming Vulnerable in Detention. [URL] (last viewed April 22, 2014).
Martìnez-Gòmez Gòmez, Aída. 2011. “La interpretación en instituciones penitenciarias. La relevancia del componente interpersonal en la calidad de la actuación de intérpretes naturales”. PhD dissertation, Universitat d’Alacant.Google Scholar
Orellana, Marjorie F. 2001. “The Work Kids Do: Mexican and Central American Migrant Children’s Contributions to Households and Schools in California”. Harvard Educational Review 71:3. 366–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Translating Childhoods: Immigrant Youth, Language and Culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Orellana, Marjorie F., Lisa M. Dorner & Lucila Pulido. 2003. “Accessing Assets: Immigrant Youth’s Work as Family Translators or Para-phrasers”. Social Problems 50:4. 505–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osservatorio Europeo sulla Sicurezza 2012. L’Insicurezza sociale ed economica in europa: significati, immagine e realtà. Rapporto annuale 2012. [URL] (last viewed April 8, 2015).
Polchi, Vladimiro. 2010. “L’Italia e la criminalità mediatica. Più si guardano i Tg, più cresce la paura”. La Repubblica 14 gennaio 2010: 15. [URL] (last viewed April 7, 2015).
Tranchese, Alessia. 2008. “Perché la bestia è sempre l'altro: rappresentazioni di perpetratori di stupro nei quotidiani italiani e singaporiani”. MA dissertation, SSLMIT of the University of Bologna.Google Scholar
Valdés, Guadalupe. 2002. Understanding the Special Giftedness of Young Interpreters. Storr (CT): National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. [URL] (last viewed April 22, 2014).
Weisskirch, Robert S. 2005. “The Relationship of Language Brokering to Ethnic Identity for Latino Early Adolescents”. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 27:3. 286–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weisskirch, Robert S. & Sylvia Alatorre Alva. 2002. “Language Brokering and the Acculturation of Latino Children”. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 24:3. 369–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Nikolajová Kupferschmidtová, Elena
2022. Communication with third-country nationals in detention facilities. Belügyi Szemle 70:2. ksz. ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Maryns, Katrijn, Philipp Sebastian Angermeyer & Mieke Van Herreweghe
2021. Introduction: Flexible multilingual strategies in asylum and migration encounters. The Translator 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.