Cover not available
Part of
Opera in Translation: Unity and diversity
Edited by Adriana Şerban and Kelly Kar Yue Chan
[Benjamins Translation Library 153] 2020
► pp. 75–94

When Mei Lanfang encountered Fei Mu

Adaptation as intersemiotic translation in early Chinese opera film

| Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China
This chapter examines the intersemiotic translation of Chinese opera for cinema, between stage and screen. It examines the collaboration of Fei Mu and Mei Lanfang in producing China’s first color movie, an opera film, A Wedding in the Dream (1948). The two artists attempted to expand the expressive borders of stage and screen to forge a cultural identity of Chinese cinema. But the intermedia venture presented issues in adaptation, cinematization, and translation. How does opera film reconcile the realistic tradition of cinema with the figurative nature of Chinese theater? The study looks at the intermediality of adaptation as a practice of intersemiotic translation, focusing on how the symbolism of Chinese theater can be translated into cinematic form.
Keywords: Chinese theater, Fei Mu, May Fourth, Mei Lanfang, Bejing opera, opera film, intermediality, intersemiotic translation, realism, screen adaptation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Mei Lanfang: Transmission of operatic heritage
  • 3.Fei Mu: Restoring the operatic stage in cinematic reproduction
  • 4.Coda
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.153.04ng
References (36)
References
Anderegg, Michael. 2000. “Wells / Shakespeare / Film: An Overview.” In Film Adaptation, ed. by James Naremore, 154–171. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Balázs, Bela. [1952] 1985. “Theory of the Film: Sound.” In Film Sound: Theory and Practice, ed. by Elisabeth Weis, and John Belton, 116–125. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bazin, André. [1951] 2005. “Theater and Cinema.” In What Is Cinema, by André Bazin. Volume 1, 76–124. Trans. by Hugh Gray. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. [1952] 2005. “In Defense of Mixed Cinema.” In What Is Cinema, by André Bazin. Volume 1, 53–75. Trans. by Hugh Gray. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. [1955] 2005. “The Evolution of the Language of Cinema.” In What Is Cinema, by André Bazin. Volume 1, 23–40. Trans. by Hugh Gray. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. [1936] 2002. “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility.” In Selected Writings, ed. by Marcus Bullock, and Michael W. Jennings, 101–133. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt. [1936] 1964. “Alienation Effects in Chinese Acting.” In Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, ed. by John Willett, 91–99. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Sergei. 1935. “The Enchanter from the Pear Garden.” Theatre Arts Monthly 19 (10): 761–770.Google Scholar
Farquhar, Mary, and Chris Berry. 2005. “Shadow Opera: Toward a New Archaeology of the Chinese Cinema.” In Chinese-language Film: Historiography, Poetics, Politics, ed. by Sheldon H. Lu, and Emilie Yueh-yu Yeh, 27–51. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Operatic Modes: Opera Film, Martial Arts, and Cultural Nationalism.” In China on Screen: Cinema and Nation by Chris Berry, and Mary Farquhar, 47–74. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fei, Mu. [1941] 1998. “The Issue of Cinematization of Chinese Opera” [Zhongguo jiuju de dianying hua wenti]. In Shiren daoyan: Fei Mu, 81–83.Google Scholar
Fischlin, Daniel. 2014. “OuterSpeares: Shakespeare, Intermedia, and the Limits of Adaptation.” In OuterSpeares: Shakespeare, Intermedia, and the Limits of Adaptation, ed. by Daniel Fishchlin, 3–50. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gao, Xiaojian. 2005. Zhongguo xiqu dianying shi [A History of Chinese Opera]. Beijing: Wenhua yishu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua. 1999. “Mei Lanfang and the Nationalization of Peking Opera, 1912–1930.” Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique 7 (2): 377–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Drama Kings: Players and Publics in the Re-creation of Peking Opera, 1870–1937. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunn, Edward. 1980. Unwelcome Muse: Chinese Literature in Shanghai and Peking, 1937–1945. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. [1959] 1987. “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” In Language in Literature, ed. by Krystina Pomorska, and Stephen Rudy, 428–435. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kattenbelt, Chiel. 2006. “Theatre as the Art of the Performer and the Stage of Intermediality.” In Intermediality in Theatre and Performance, ed. by Freda Chapple, and Chiel Kattenbelt, 29–40. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Koo, Siu-sun. 2008. “Genre-crossing of Film and Opera: The Cinema of Zhu Shilin at a Glance.” In Zhu Shilin: A Filmmaker of his Times, ed. by Ain-ling Wong, 144–153. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Film Archive.Google Scholar
Lei, Daphne P. 2006. Operatic China: Staging Chinese Identity across the Pacific. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackerras, Colin. 1983. Chinese Theater: From Its Origins to the Present Day. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Mei, Lanfang [Mei Lan-fang]. 1965a. “The Filming of a Tradition.” Eastern Horizon 4 (July): 13–22.Google Scholar
]. 1965b. “The Filming of a Tradition.” Eastern Horizon 4 (August): 43–49.Google Scholar
Mei, Shaowu. 2005. Mei Lanfang zishu [Autobiography of Mei Lanfang]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Qi, Rushan. 1948. Interview. Xinmin bao wankan (Shanghai), August 3, 3.Google Scholar
Scott, Adolphe Clarence. 1971. Mei Lan-fang: The Life and Times of a Peking Actor. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. [1966] 2005. “Film and Theater.” In Theater and Film: A Comparative Anthology, ed. by Robert Knopf, 143–151. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stathi, Irini. 2015. “Inter-semiotic Translation and Transfer Theory in Cinematic / Audiovisual Adaptations of Greek Drama.” In International Handbook of Semiotics, ed. by Peter Pericles Trifonas, 321–338. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Qiying. [1985] 1998. “Fei Mu de wutai yishu” [The Stage Arts of Fei Mu]. In Shiren daoyan: Fei Mu, ed. by Ain-ling Wong, 181–188. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Film Critics Society.Google Scholar
Teo, Stephen. 2013. “The Opera Film in Chinese Cinema.” In The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Cinemas, ed. by Carlos Rojas, and Eileen Cheng-yin Chow, 209–224. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tian, Han. [1937] 1998. “ Zhan jingtang ping” [Comment on Murder at the Oracle ]. In Shiren daoyan: Fei Mu, 262–270.Google Scholar
Tian, Min. 2008. The Poetics of Difference and Displacement: Twentieth-century Chinese-Western Intercultural Theatre. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, David Der-wei. 2013. “Fei Mu, Mei Lanfang, and the Polemics of Screening China.” In The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Cinemas, ed. by Carlos Rojas, and Eileen Cheng-yin Chow, 62–78. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, Ain-ling. 2000. “Fei Mu: A Different Destiny.” Cinemaya 49: 52–58.Google Scholar
Yeh, Catherine. 2007. “Refined Beauty, New Woman, Dynamic Heroine or Fighter for the Nation? Perceptions of China in the Programme Selection for Mei Lanfang’s Performances in Japan (1919), the United States (1930) and the Soviet Union (1935).” EJEAS 6 (1): 75–102.Google Scholar
Zheng, Peikai. 1999. “Xiqu yu dianying de jiuge: Mei Lanfang yu Fei Mu de Shengsihen ” [The entangled relationship between traditional theater and cinema: Mei Lanfang and Fei Mu’s A Wedding in the Dream ]. In Wenyi lilun yu tongsu wenhua [Literary theory and popular culture], ed. by Peng Hsiao-yen, 547–576. Taibei: Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ng, Kenny K. K.
2020. Remaking China: The Canonization of Fei Mu’s Cinema. In Chinese Culture in the 21st Century and its Global Dimensions [Chinese Culture, 2], ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.