Translation Studies (TS) has gained a certain recognition as a domain in its own right. Along with this recognition, come various forms of institutionalization, even though it is difficult to determine its exact nature and scope and different “turns” have been taken (linguistic, textual, psycholinguistic, cognitive, sociological, etc.). We deal first with TS easily borrowing from various other disciplines and we question the types of interdisciplinarity. Then we claim that, in the process of maturation, the time has come for a socio-analysis of the field. In the second part of the paper, we try to understand the possible relationships between translation, the translator and sociology. Finally, we suggest a socio-translation, with three main orientations.
2016. The Multiple Lives of Translators1. TTR 26:2 ► pp. 103 ff.
De Wilde, July
2013. The Interdisciplinary Character of Research into the Translation of Literary Irony. TTR 25:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
McDonough Dolmaya, Julie
2012. Analyzing the Crowdsourcing Model and Its Impact on Public Perceptions of Translation. The Translator 18:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Straub, Jürgen, Werner Nothdurft, Hartmut Rosa, Norbert Ricken, Nicole Balzer, Klaus Jonas, Marianne Schmid Mast, Hans-Herbert Kögler, Mary Snell-Hornby, Gabriele Cappai, Martin Fuchs, Werner Nothdurft, Thorsten Bonacker & Lars Schmitt
2007. Grundbegriffe. In Handbuch interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kompetenz, ► pp. 5 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.