Part of
Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar
Edited by Hans C. Boas and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Constructional Approaches to Language 15] 2014
► pp. 79111
References (39)
Aarts, B
(2007) Syntactic gradience. The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, S
(2001/2) Les locutions prépositives: Questions de méthodologie et de definition [Complex prepositions: Issues related to methodology and definition]. Travaux de Linguistique, 42–43, 157–170. DOI logo
Boas, H.C
(2003) A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Boone, A
(1987) Les constructions ‘Il est linguiste’ / c’est un linguiste’ [The constructions ‘He is linguist’ / ‘That is a linguist’]. Langue française, 75, 94–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, J., & Dubois-Charlier, F
(2004) Locutions en français [Fixed expressions in French]. Aix-en-Provence: by the authors.Google Scholar
Fagard, B., & de Mulder, W
(2007) La formation des prépositions complexes: Grammaticalisation ou lexicalisation? [The formation of complex prepositions: Grammaticalization or lexicalization?]. Langue Française, 156, 9–29.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., & Kay, P
(1993) Construction Grammar course book. Manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.-C
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64, 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flaux, N., & Van de Velde, D
(2000) Les noms en français: Esquisse de classement [Nouns in French: A classificatory sketch]. Gap/Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Franckel, J.-J., & Paillard, D
(2007) Grammaire des prépositions[The grammar of prepositions]. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Fried, M., & Östmann, J.-O
(2004) Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried, & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaatone, D
(1976) Locutions prépositives et groupes prépositionnels [Complex prepositions and prepositional phrases]. Linguistics, 167, 15–33.Google Scholar
Girard-Gillet, G
(2008) ‘Sous’ et les parties du corps en anglais [‘Under’ and body parts in English]. L’Information Grammaticale, 117, 35–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzálvez-García, F
(2011) Metaphor and metonymy do not render coercion superfluous: Evidence from the subjective-transitive construction. Linguistics, 49(6), 1305–1358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, G
(1996) Les expressions figées en français. Noms composés et autres locutions [Fixed expressions in French. Compound nouns and other fixed expressions]. Gap and Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
(2006) Sur le statut des locutions prépositives [On the status of complex prepositions]. Modèles linguistiques, 27(2), 35–50.Google Scholar
Gross, M
(1986) Grammaire transformationnelle du français. 3. Syntaxe de l’adverbe [Transformational grammar in French: 3. The syntax of adverbs]. Paris: Asstril.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lauwers, P
(2008) The nominalization of adjectives in French: from morphological conversion to categorial mismatch. Folia Linguistica, 42(1), 135–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Comment dissocier des locutions prépositives quasi synonymiques? Essai d’analyse collostructionnelle [How can we distinguish between near synonymic complex prepositions? A collostructional analysis]. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 55(1), 55–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauwers, P., & Willems, D
(2011) Coercion: Definition and challenges, current approaches, and new trends. Linguistics, 49(6), 1219–1235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeman, D
(Ed.) (2007) Modèles linguistiques 55. De la préposition à la locution prépositive [Special issue: From prepositions to fixed complex prepositions]. Toulon: Éditions des Dauphins.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2008) L’Information grammaticale 117. Locutions du français, traduction et traduction automatique [Special issue: Fixed expressions in French, translation and automatic translation]. Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Marque-Pucheu, C
(2001) Les locutions prépositives: Du spatial au non spatial [Complex prepositions: from spatial to non-spatial]. Langue française, 129, 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mejri, S
(1997) Le figement lexical: Descriptions linguistiques et structuration sémantique [Lexical fossilization: linguistic descriptions and semantic structuring]. Tunisie: Publications de la Faculté de lettres de la Manouba.Google Scholar
Melis, L
(2001/2) La préposition est-elle toujours la tête d’un groupe prépositionnel? [Are prepositions always the head of a prepositional phrase?]. Travaux de Linguistique, 42–43,11–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) La préposition en français [Prepositions in French]. Gap/Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Merle, J.-M
(2008) Prépositions et aspect [Prepositions and aspect]. L’information grammaticale, 117, 52–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, L
(2003) Word meaning, sentence meaning, and syntactic meaning. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics (pp. 163–209). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, J., & Bouillon, P
(1995) Aspectual coercion and logical polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 12(2), 133–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riegel, M
(1985) L’adjectif attribut. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar
Svenonius, P., & Roy, I
(2009) Complex prepositions. In J. François, E. Gilbert, C. Guimier, & M. Krause (Eds.), Autour de la préposition (pp. 105–116). Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, D
(2000) Quelques variétés de pluriels de noms abstraits: référence (pro-) nominale plurielle: Aspects linguistiques et psycholinguistiques [Some varieties of plural abstract nouns: plural (pro-)nominal reference: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects]. Verbum, 12, 379–395.Google Scholar
(2006) Les adjectifs de groupe [‘Group’ adjectives]. Travaux de Linguistique, 53, 135–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Langendonck, W., Lauwers, P., Lamiroy, B., Melis, L., & Van Belle, W
(2005) De nominale constituent [The nominal constituent]. In Nederlandse Grammatica voor Franstaligen [Dutch Grammar for speakers of French], Working papers, K. U. Leuven, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Willems, D
(2000) La ‘coercition’ revisitée: Le cas des structures trivalentes en français [Coercion revisited: The case of trivalent verbal structures in French]. In M. Coene, W. De Mulder, P. Dendale, & Y. D’Hulst (Eds.), Traiani augusti vestigia pressa sequamur. Studia lingvistica in honorem Lilianae Tasmowski (pp. 233–242). Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar