Part of
Diachronic Construction GrammarEdited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
[Constructional Approaches to Language 18] 2015
► pp. 81–106
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
[Constructional Approaches to Language 18] 2015
► pp. 81–106
Constructionalization and constructional change
The role of context in the development of constructions
In recent constructional approaches to language change, the distinction between constructionalization and constructional changes has been made (cf. e.g. Rostila 2004; Noël 2007; Traugott & Trousdale 2013; Traugott this volume). The term constructionalization generally refers to the formation of new constructions, while diverse changes in existing constructions are labeled as constructional changes. This chapter focuses on the impact of context in the development of new constructions. It proposes to model constructionalization as a gradual accumulation of contextual restrictions followed by a structural reorganization of language material, whereby pieces of relevant contextual information are integrated into a new construction type. Two case studies and some further examples from the literature will demonstrate how the proposed model accounts for the development of new constructions from different domains of grammar.
References (51)
Askedal, J.O. (1984). Grammatikalisierung und Auxiliarisierung im sogenannten ‚bekommen/kriegen/erhalten-Passiv‘ des Deutschen. Kopenhagener Beiträge zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 22, 5–47.
. (2005). Grammatikalisierung und Persistenz im deutschen Rezipienten-Passiv mit bekommen/kriegen/erhalten
. In T. Leuschner, T. Mortelmans, & S. De Groodt (Eds.), Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen (pp. 211–228). Berlin: de Gruyter. 
Bader, M. (2012). The German bekommen passive: A case study on frequency and grammaticality. Linguistische Berichte, 231, 249–298.
Barðdal, J. (2008). Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barðdal, J., & Chelliah, S. (Eds.). (2009). The role of semantic, pragmatic and discourse factors in the development of case. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G. (Eds.). (2008). Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (Eds.). (2009). Context and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, J. (2003). Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph, & R.J. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell.
. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Languages 82(4), 711–733.
. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J., & Cacoullos, R.T. (2009). The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In R. Corrigan, E. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 university of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Symposium on Formulaic Language (pp. 187–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cristofaro, S. (2012). Cognitive explanations, distributional evidence, and diachrony. In N. Gisborne, & W. Hollmann (Eds.), Theory and data in cognitive linguistics. Special issue of Studies in Language, 36(3), 645–670.
Croft, W. (1998). Linguistic evidence and mental representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 151–173.
. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Smet, H. (2012). The course of actualization. Language, 88, 601–633.
Diewald, G. (1997). Grammatikalisierung: Eine Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. (2002). A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 103–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2006). Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Constructions. Special Volume 1: Constructions all over - case studies and theoretical implications. [[URL]]
. (2008). The catalytic function of constructional restrictions in grammaticalization. In E. Verhoeven, S. Skopeteas, Y.-M. Shin, Y. Nishina, & J. Helmbrecht (Eds.), Studies on grammaticalization (pp. 219–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E. (2010). Evidentiality in German. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2012). Paradigmatic integration: The fourth stage in an expanded grammaticalization scenario. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections (pp. 111–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone
. Language, 64(3), 501–538.
Fried, M. (2008). Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), 47–79.
. (2009). Representing contextual factors in language change: Between frames and constructions. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), 63–94.
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, A., & Campbell, L. (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, M. (2004). On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Perridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, B. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hilpert, M. (2013). Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. In G. Trousdale, & Th. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 458–477). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Himmelmann, N. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N.P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization - A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hopper, P. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In E.C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. I (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E.C. (2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Israel, M. (1996). The way constructions grow. In A.L. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 217–230). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kuteva, T. (2004). Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Leirbukt, O. (1997). Untersuchungen zu bekommen-Passiv im heutigen Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Noël, D. (2007). Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language, 14, 177–202.
Rostila, J. (2004). Lexicalization as a way to grammaticalization. In F. Karlsson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Scandinavian conference of linguistics. [URL].
Smirnova, E. (2006). Die Entwicklung der Konstruktion würde + Infinitiv im Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Stathi, K. (2010). Is German gehören an auxiliary? The grammaticalization of the construction gehören + participle II. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. König (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 323–342). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Timberlake, A. (1977). Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In C. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (pp. 141–177). Austin, Texas: University of Texas.
Traugott, E.C. (2008). Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, selection, development: Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, E.C., & Richard, B.D. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G. (2010). Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In E.C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp. 19–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trousdale, G. (2008). Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In G. Trousdale, & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 33–67). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2010). Issues in constructional approaches to grammaticalization. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. Konig (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 51–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2012). Theory and data in diachronic construction grammar: The case of the what with construction. In N. Gisborne, & W. Hollmann (Eds.), Theory and data in cognitive linguistics. Special issue of Studies in Language, 36(3), 576–602.
Wegener, H. (1985). ‘Er bekommt widersprochen‘: Argumente für die Existenz eines Dativpassivs im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte, 96, 127–139.
Cited by (24)
Cited by 24 other publications
Schneider, Stefan
BYBEE, JOAN
2023. What Is Usage‐Based Linguistics?. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 7 ff. 
Gildea, Spike & Jóhanna Barðdal
2023. From grammaticalization to Diachronic Construction Grammar. Studies in Language 47:4 ► pp. 743 ff.
Habermann, Mechthild
2023. The German geschweige denn construction. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
2023. The semiotics of motion encoding in Early English: a cognitive semiotic analysis of phrasal verbs in Old and Middle English. Semiotica 2023:251 ► pp. 55 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Haihua Pan
2023. The development of the Chinese VdeO cleft construction. Studies in Language 47:2 ► pp. 318 ff.
Fonteyn, Lauren & Peter Petré
2022. On the probability and direction of morphosyntactic lifespan change. Language Variation and Change 34:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Smirnova, Elena & Vanessa Stöber
2022. Verbo-Nominal Constructions withkommen‘come’ in German. Constructions and Frames 14:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
White, Nathan M.
2022. Grammaticalization and phonological reidentification in White Hmong. Studies in Language 46:1 ► pp. 258 ff.
Zehentner, Eva & Marianne Hundt
2022. Chapter 8. Prepositions in Early Modern English argument structure and beyond. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358], ► pp. 202 ff.
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. A constructional account of the loss of the adverse avertive schema in Mandarin Chinese. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], ► pp. 131 ff.
Prévost, Sophie
2021. Évolution de la position du sujet en français : une approche constructionnelle. Langue française N° 209:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Flach, Susanne
2020. Constructionalization and the Sorites Paradox. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 46 ff.
Fonteyn, Lauren & Andrea Nini
2020. Individuality in syntactic variation: An investigation of the seventeenth-century gerund alternation. Cognitive Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 279 ff.
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
2020. Introduction. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 2 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong
2020. The development of the Chinese expressive zhenshide: A diachronic constructional approach. Lingua 248 ► pp. 102981 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong
2022. A constructional account of the development of the Chinese stance discourse markerběnlái. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Rosemeyer, Malte & Mar Garachana
2019. De la consecución a la contraexpectación: la construccionalización delograr/conseguir+ infinitivo. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 383 ff.
Smirnova, Elena
2015. When secondary grammaticalization starts: a look from the constructional perspective. Language Sciences 47 ► pp. 215 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2015. The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in Language 39:2 ► pp. 459 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2019. The development of the Chinese copulashìconstruction. Functions of Language 26:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica 37:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. A constructional account of the loss of the adverse avertive schema in Mandarin Chinese. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218],
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.