Part of
Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
[Constructional Approaches to Language 18] 2015
► pp. 173212
References (51)
References
Barbosa, A., & Lopes, C.R. (2003). Corpus diacrônico do Rio de Janeiro: cartas pessoais – séculos XVIII-XIX. Retrieved from [URL]
. (Eds.). (2006). Críticas, queixumes e bajulações na Imprensa Brasileira do século XIX: cartas de leitores e cartas de redatores. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. (2008). Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, K.E., & Sveen, A. (2011). West Scandinavian Ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V-REFL-NP construction. Linguistics, 49(1), 53–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C.E. (1910). Syntax of early Latin, vol. 1 – The verb. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Braga, M.L., & Paiva, C. (2011). Gramaticalização e Gramática de Construções: Estabilidade e Instabilidade no Uso de Orações Complexas de Causa em Tempo Real. Letras & Letras, 27(1), 51–70.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2003). Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph, & R.J. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castilho, A.T. de. (2010). Nova Gramática do Português Brasileiro. São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar
Coutinho, I. de L. (1976). Gramática Histórica. Rio de Janeiro: Ao Livro Técnico.Google Scholar
Cunha, A.G. (1986). Dicionário Etimológico Nova Fronteira da Língua Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar
Davies, M., & Ferreira, M. (2006-). Corpus do Português: 45 million words, 1300-1900. Retrieved from [URL]
Dias, N.B. (2006-). Corpus Fala Mineira: O Português Falado na Região de Juiz de Fora e Arredores. Available under request to the organizer.Google Scholar
. (2010) As Cláusulas de Finalidade no Português do Brasil: uma proposta. In M.J. Marçalo, M.C. Lima-Hernandes, E. Esteves, M. do C. Fonseca, O. Gonçalves, A.L. Vilela, & A.A. Silva (Eds.), Anais do II Simpósio Mundial de Estudos de Língua Portuguesa (pp. 152–171). Évora: Universidade de Évora.Google Scholar
Ernout, A., & Thomas, F. (1953). Sintaxe Latine. 2nd Edition. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Faria, E. (1958). Gramática Superior da Língua Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Acadêmica.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. (2008). Wherewithal: eine verborgene Konstruktion. In A. Stefanowitsch, & K. Fischer (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik II: Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik (pp. 279–283). Tübingen: StauffenburgGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1989). From purposive to infinitive – A universal path of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica, X (1-2), 287–310.Google Scholar
Heine, B. (2003). Grammaticalization. In B.D. Joseph, & R.J. Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 575–607). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E.C. (1993/2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ilari, R., & Basso, R. (2006). O Português da Gente. São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C.J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s x doing y? construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Ch. (1982 [2002]). Thoughts on grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Erfurt: Universität Erfurt.Google Scholar
Lewis, C.T., & Short, C. (1879). A Latin Dictionary – founded on Andrews’ edition of Freund’s Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Claredon Press.Google Scholar
Martelotta, M.E.T. (2011). The conclusive clause in Portuguese: An approach combining grammaticalization theory and construction grammar theory. Letras & Letras, 27(1), 15–38.Google Scholar
Maurer Jr., T.H. (1959). Gramática do Latim Vulgar. Rio de Janeiro: Acadêmica.Google Scholar
Nöel, D. (2007). Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language, 14(2), 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, M. (1985[2007]). Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. 2nd Edition (pp. 52–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perrochat, P. (1932). Recherches sur La Valeur et L’Emploi de L’Infinitif Subordonné en Latin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Reddy, M.J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rezende, T.C.C. (2006). Dinâmica do Contato Dialetal: Estudo sociolingüístico em Conceição de Ibitipoca – MG. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Rodrigues, A. (2011). Sobre a emergência de construções: Evidências Translinguísticas. Letras & Letras, 27(1, 111–126.Google Scholar
Salomão, M.M.M. (1990). Polysemy, aspect and modality in Brazilian Portuguese: the case for a cognitive explanation of grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics. University of California, Berkeley.
. (2007). The metaphoric grounding of grammar: The modal construction with ‘give’ in Brazilian Portuguese. In The 33rd Annual Meeting of The Berkeley Linguistics Society . University of California, Berkeley.
Sigiliano, N. (2012). Evidências translinguísticas da metáfora de movimento na construção de aspecto inceptivo. Linguística, 8(1), 33–48.Google Scholar
Silveira, S.B., Gago, P., & Dias, N.B. (2004-). Corpus PROCON – Juiz de Fora. Available under request to the organizers.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.E. (1988). Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Proceedings of The Fourteenth Annual Meeting of The Berkeley Linguistics Society , University of California, Berkeley.
. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1981). Force dynamics. Conference on language and mental imagery . University of California, Berkeley.
. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 2, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrent, T.T. (2009). A Rede de Construções em Para (SN) Infinitivo: uma abordagem centrada no uso para as relações de herança e mudança construcionais. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
. (2011). The construction network reconfiguration hypothesis. Letras & Letras, 27(1), 143–162.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C. (2008). Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra, (Eds.), Variation, selection, development – Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.). (2010). Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velloso, M.M. (2007). Um Estudo da Idiomatização da Construção Modal com O Verbo Dar no Português do Brasil. MA Thesis in Linguistics. Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora.Google Scholar
Xavier, M.F., Crispim, M. de L., & Vicente, G. (1999-). Dicionário de Verbos do Português Medieval. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (24)

Cited by 24 other publications

Grabski, Maciej
2024. Multiple Adjectival Modification in Old and Middle English: A Reconfiguration of a Constructional Network. Journal of English Linguistics 52:2  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Béchet, Christophe & Lieselotte Brems
2023. From complex prepositions to complex subordinators: challenging generalizations. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 55:2  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Czulo, Oliver, Alexander Willich, Alexander Ziem & Tiago T. Torrent
2023. A multilingual approach to the interaction between frames and constructions. Constructions and Frames 15:1  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches, DOI logo
Wu, Xia & Yicheng Wu
Bouso, Tamara
2022. Where Does Lexical Diversity Come From? Horizontal Interaction in the Network of the Late Modern English Reaction Object Construction. English Studies 103:8  pp. 1334 ff. DOI logo
KALTENBÖCK, GUNTHER & ELNORA TEN WOLDE
2022. AJust SoStory: on the recent emergence of the purpose subordinatorjust so. English Language and Linguistics 26:4  pp. 889 ff. DOI logo
Maekelberghe, Charlotte
2021. Assessing the impact of syntactic complement type on the modifying status of complement-taking predicates: the case of imagine. Language Sciences 86  pp. 101390 ff. DOI logo
Zehentner, Eva
2021. Alternations emerge and disappear: the network of dispossession constructions in the history of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3  pp. 525 ff. DOI logo
Budts, Sara & Peter Petré
2020. Putting connections centre stage in diachronic Construction Grammar. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 318 ff. DOI logo
Flach, Susanne
2020. Constructionalization and the Sorites Paradox. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Gyselinck, Emmeline
2020. (Re)shaping the constructional network. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2020. Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 12:2  pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
Luraghi, Silvia, Chiara Naccarato & Erica Pinelli
2020. Theu+gen construction in Modern Standard Russian. Cognitive Linguistics 31:1  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
2020. Introduction. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Sommerer, Lotte
2020. Constructionalization, constructional competition and constructional death. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
Hilpert, Martin
2018. Three open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin
2024. The road ahead for Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 16:2  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Torrent, Tiago Timponi, Ely Edison da Silva Matos, Ludmila Meireles Lage, Adrieli Laviola, Tatiane da Silva Tavares, Vânia Gomes de Almeida & Natália Sathler Sigiliano
Gyselinck, Emmeline & Timothy Colleman
2016. Tracking shifts in the literal versus the intensifying fake reflexive resultative construction. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Noël, Dirk
2016. For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.