This work addresses the relation between inheritance and change in the framework of Diachronic Construction Grammar. Given that change is commonly thought of as a linear unidirectional path and inheritance relations tend to be organized in a multidirectional radial fashion, I propose two hypotheses to account for the way new constructions emerge in a language and their relation to existing constructions. The Constructional Convergence Hypothesis claims that historically unrelated constructions can come to participate in the same formally and functionally motivated network of constructions. Such participation results from a series of changes that merge the form and meaning of the new construction into an already existing pattern. The Construction Network Reconfiguration Hypothesis then proposes that, as new constructions emerge, inheritance relations in construction networks change. The change drives speakers to propose new links between constructions regardless of linear relationships. To demonstrate the validity of this claim, I develop an analysis of constructions from the Para Infinitive family of constructions in Brazilian Portuguese, based on extensive data collection from the 13th to the 21st century. The analyses show that speakers seem to have reconfigured the Para Infinitive construction network as far back as the 13th century. Since then, the emergence of new patterns has led to the expansion of the network and the reconfiguration of its inheritance links.
Barbosa, A., & Lopes, C.R. (2003). Corpus diacrônico do Rio de Janeiro: cartas pessoais – séculos XVIII-XIX. Retrieved from [URL]
Barbosa, A., & Lopes, C.R. (Eds.). (2006). Críticas, queixumes e bajulações na Imprensa Brasileira do século XIX: cartas de leitores e cartas de redatores. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.
Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, K.E., & Sveen, A. (2011). West Scandinavian Ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V-REFL-NP construction. Linguistics, 49(1), 53–104.
Bennett, C.E. (1910). Syntax of early Latin, vol. 1 – The verb. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Braga, M.L., & Paiva, C. (2011). Gramaticalização e Gramática de Construções: Estabilidade e Instabilidade no Uso de Orações Complexas de Causa em Tempo Real. Letras & Letras, 27(1), 51–70.
Bybee, J. (2003). Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph, & R.J. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell.
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Castilho, A.T. de. (2010). Nova Gramática do Português Brasileiro. São Paulo: Contexto.
Coutinho, I. de L. (1976). Gramática Histórica. Rio de Janeiro: Ao Livro Técnico.
Cunha, A.G. (1986). Dicionário Etimológico Nova Fronteira da Língua Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.
Davies, M., & Ferreira, M. (2006-). Corpus do Português: 45 million words, 1300-1900. Retrieved from [URL]
Dias, N.B. (2006-). Corpus Fala Mineira: O Português Falado na Região de Juiz de Fora e Arredores. Available under request to the organizer.
Dias, N.B. (2010) As Cláusulas de Finalidade no Português do Brasil: uma proposta. In M.J. Marçalo, M.C. Lima-Hernandes, E. Esteves, M. do C. Fonseca, O. Gonçalves, A.L. Vilela, & A.A. Silva (Eds.), Anais do II Simpósio Mundial de Estudos de Língua Portuguesa (pp. 152–171). Évora: Universidade de Évora.
Ernout, A., & Thomas, F. (1953). Sintaxe Latine. 2nd Edition. Paris: Klincksieck.
Faria, E. (1958). Gramática Superior da Língua Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Acadêmica.
Fillmore, C.J. (2008). Wherewithal: eine verborgene Konstruktion. In A. Stefanowitsch, & K. Fischer (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik II: Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik (pp. 279–283). Tübingen: Stauffenburg
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A.E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, M. (1989). From purposive to infinitive – A universal path of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica, X (1-2), 287–310.
Heine, B. (2003). Grammaticalization. In B.D. Joseph, & R.J. Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 575–607). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hopper, P. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ilari, R., & Basso, R. (2006). O Português da Gente. São Paulo: Contexto.
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C.J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s x doing y? construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lehmann, Ch. (1982 [2002]). Thoughts on grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Erfurt: Universität Erfurt.
Lewis, C.T., & Short, C. (1879). A Latin Dictionary – founded on Andrews’ edition of Freund’s Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Claredon Press.
Martelotta, M.E.T. (2011). The conclusive clause in Portuguese: An approach combining grammaticalization theory and construction grammar theory. Letras & Letras, 27(1), 15–38.
Maurer Jr., T.H. (1959). Gramática do Latim Vulgar. Rio de Janeiro: Acadêmica.
Noonan, M. (1985[2007]). Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. 2nd Edition (pp. 52–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perrochat, P. (1932). Recherches sur La Valeur et L’Emploi de L’Infinitif Subordonné en Latin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Reddy, M.J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rezende, T.C.C. (2006). Dinâmica do Contato Dialetal: Estudo sociolingüístico em Conceição de Ibitipoca – MG. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Rodrigues, A. (2011). Sobre a emergência de construções: Evidências Translinguísticas. Letras & Letras, 27(1, 111–126.
Salomão, M.M.M. (1990). Polysemy, aspect and modality in Brazilian Portuguese: the case for a cognitive explanation of grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics. University of California, Berkeley.
Salomão, M.M.M. (2007). The metaphoric grounding of grammar: The modal construction with ‘give’ in Brazilian Portuguese. In
The 33rd Annual Meeting of The Berkeley Linguistics Society
. University of California, Berkeley.
Sigiliano, N. (2012). Evidências translinguísticas da metáfora de movimento na construção de aspecto inceptivo. Linguística, 8(1), 33–48.
Silveira, S.B., Gago, P., & Dias, N.B. (2004-). Corpus PROCON – Juiz de Fora. Available under request to the organizers.
Sweetser, E.E. (1988). Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In
Proceedings of The Fourteenth Annual Meeting of The Berkeley Linguistics Society
, University of California, Berkeley.
Sweetser, E.E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (1981). Force dynamics.
Conference on language and mental imagery
. University of California, Berkeley.
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 2, 49–100.
Torrent, T.T. (2009). A Rede de Construções em Para (SN) Infinitivo: uma abordagem centrada no uso para as relações de herança e mudança construcionais. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
Torrent, T.T. (2011). The construction network reconfiguration hypothesis. Letras & Letras, 27(1), 143–162.
Traugott, E.C. (2008). Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra, (Eds.), Variation, selection, development – Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Velloso, M.M. (2007). Um Estudo da Idiomatização da Construção Modal com O Verbo Dar no Português do Brasil. MA Thesis in Linguistics. Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora.
Xavier, M.F., Crispim, M. de L., & Vicente, G. (1999-). Dicionário de Verbos do Português Medieval. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (24)
Cited by 24 other publications
Grabski, Maciej
2024. Multiple Adjectival Modification in Old and Middle English: A Reconfiguration of a Constructional Network. Journal of English Linguistics 52:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Béchet, Christophe & Lieselotte Brems
2023. From complex prepositions to complex subordinators: challenging generalizations. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 55:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Czulo, Oliver, Alexander Willich, Alexander Ziem & Tiago T. Torrent
2022. Where Does Lexical Diversity Come From? Horizontal Interaction in the Network of the Late Modern English Reaction Object Construction. English Studies 103:8 ► pp. 1334 ff.
KALTENBÖCK, GUNTHER & ELNORA TEN WOLDE
2022. AJust SoStory: on the recent emergence of the purpose subordinatorjust so. English Language and Linguistics 26:4 ► pp. 889 ff.
Maekelberghe, Charlotte
2021. Assessing the impact of syntactic complement type on the modifying status of complement-taking predicates: the case of imagine. Language Sciences 86 ► pp. 101390 ff.
Zehentner, Eva
2021. Alternations emerge and disappear: the network of dispossession constructions in the history of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3 ► pp. 525 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.