In typological studies of expressions of motion events, there is a need for a
quantitative methodology that assesses and qualifies inter- and intra-linguistic
variation. The article reports on a large corpus study of the use of Spanish
motion verbs in constructions of telic motion. Verb associations with the
constructional V-slot were measured by using collostructional methodology
(Stefanowitsch and Gries, 2003). Six categories of construction-specific variation
were identified. The corpus data and broad evidence from other semantic
domains suggest that the encoding of Spanish argument structure is verb-driven
and that verb constraints versus schematicity is a typological parameter. The
study concludes that Spanish is a verb-framing language rather than a verbframed
language (cf. Talmy, 2000), which explains the substantial variation
observed.
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall, M. Meacham, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the berkeley linguistics society (pp. 1–14). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Fanego, T. (2012). Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of manner salience from old English to late modern English. Folia linguistica historica, 33, 29–85.
Gennari, S.P., Sloman, S.A., Malt, B.C., & Fitch, W.T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79.
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A.E. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A.E., & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80, 532–568.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2004a). Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 317–349.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2004b). Motion events in Basque narratives. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 89–111). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2009). Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Őzçalişkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–414). New York: Psychology Press.
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. I. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1988). A usage-based model. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Masini, F. (2005). Multi-word expressions between syntax and the lexicon: The case of Italian verb-particle constructions. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 18, 145–173.
Masini, F. (2008). Verbi sintagmatici e ordine delle parole. In M. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. (Spazi comunicativi – Kommunikative Räume, Vol. 3) (pp. 83–102). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Martínez Vázquez, M. (2001). Delimited events in English and Spanish. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 9, 31–59.
Martínez Vázquez, M. (Ed.). (2003). Gramática de Construcciones. Contrastes entre el inglés y el español. Universidad de Huelva.
Mateu Fontanals, J. (2000). Path and telicity in idiomatic constructions. A lexical-syntactic approach to the Way-construction. Paper presented at the
2000 ESSLLI Workshop on Paths and Telicity in Event Structure
. University of Birmingham.
Morimoto, Y. (2008). Grammar of “manner of motion” verbs in English and Spanish: between lexicon and syntax. In N. Delbecque & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Trends in linguistics, studies and monographs: On interpreting construction schemas: From action and motion to transitivity and causality (pp. 287–305). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Narasimhan, B. (2003). Motion events and the lexicon: A case study of Hindi. Lingua, 113(2), 123–160.
Pedersen, J. (2009b). Lexical and constructional organization of argument structure. A contrastive analysis. In J. Zlatev, M. Andrén, M. Johansson Falck, & C. Lundmark (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (pp. 230–245). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Pedersen, J. (2013). The way-construction and cross-linguistic variation in syntax. Implications for typological theory. In C. Paradis, J. Hudson, & U. Magnusson (Eds.), The construal of spatial meaning, windows into conceptual space (pp. 236–262). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simone, R. (1996). Esistono verbi sintagmatici in italiano?Cuadernos de Filología Italiana, 3, 47–61. Servicio de publicaciones UCM.
Slobin, D.I. (1996a). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In J.J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 195–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D.I. (1996b). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slobin, D.I. (1997). Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D.I. (1998). Coding of motion events in narrative texts. Departments of Psychology and Linguistics. University of California at Berkeley.
Slobin, D.I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative. Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Slobin, D.I. (2008). Relations between paths of motion and paths of vision: A crosslinguistic and developmental exploration. In V.C. Mueller-Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to language: Studies in honor of Melissa Bowerman (pp. 197–221). Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slobin, D.I., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: typological considerations. In S. Gahl, A. Dolbey, & C. Johnson (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistic society (pp. 487–505). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Snyder, W. (2001). On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language, 77(2), 324–342.
Son, M. (2007). Directionality and resultativity: The cross-linguistic correlation revisited. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Linguistics, 34(2), 126–164. University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway. [URL].
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th. (2005). Covarying collexemes. Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory, 1(1), 1–43.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (1987). Lexicalization patterns: Typologies and universals (Berkeley Cognitive Science Report 47). Berkeley: Cognitive Science Program, University of California.
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In L.A. Sutton, C. Johnson, & R. Shields (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth annual Berkeley linguistics society (pp. 480–519). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 1–2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tesnière, L. (1959). Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P. (2004). A third way to travel: The place of Thai (and other serial verb languages) in motion event typology. In S. Stromqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 159–190). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Wiesinger, Evelyn
2020. ¿Esto se echa para atrás? An approach to verb-particle constructions in European Spanish based on a corpus study of [V para atrás]. Romanica Olomucensia 32:1 ► pp. 201 ff.
2024. Semantics and Pragmatics of Spanish Verb-Particle Constructions formed with para atrás ‘back(wards)’. CogniTextes Volume 25
Pedersen, Johan
2019. Verb-based vs. schema-based constructions and their variability: On the Spanish transitive directed-motion construction in a contrastive perspective. Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 473 ff.
Wiliński, Jarosław
2017. On the Brink of-Noun vs. On the Verge of-Noun: a Distinctive-Collexeme Analysis. Research in Language 15:4 ► pp. 425 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.