Chapter 11
Change in category membership from the perspective of construction grammar
A commentary
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Categories: Creation and change
- 2.1The creation of a new category
- 2.2Category restructuring
- 3.Gradualness
- 4.The constructional network
- 4.1Links between constructions
- 4.2Constructionalization, constructional changes and categories
- 5.Concluding comments
-
References
References
Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L., & Gildea, S.
Booij, G.
(
2010)
Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booij, G.
(
2013)
Morphology in construction grammar. In
T. Hoffmann, &
G. Trousdale (Eds.),
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 255–273). New York: Oxford University Press.
Colleman, T., & De Clerck, B.
(
2011)
Constructional semantics on the move: On semantic specialization in the English double object construction.
Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 183–209.
Croft, W.
(
2000)
Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.
Croft, W.
(
2001)
Radical construction grammar: Syntactic variation in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Denison, D.
(
2013)
Parts of speech: Solid citizens or slippery customers? Journal of the British Academy, 1, 151–185.
Fonteyn, L., Heyvaert, L., & Maekelberghe, C.
(
2015)
How do gerunds conceptualize events? A diachronic study.
Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 583–612.
Goldberg, A. E.
(
1995)
Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hilpert, M.
(
2013)
Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hilpert, M.
(
2015)
From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward-strengthening hypothesis.
Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 1–36.
Himmelmann, N.
(
2004)
Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In
W. Bisang,
N. P. Himmelmann, &
B. Wiemer (Eds.),
What makes grammaticalization? A look from its components and its fringes (pp. 21–42). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hudson, R. A.
(
1997)
The rise of auxiliary do: Verb-non-raising or category strengthening? Transactions of the Philological Society, 95, 41–72.
Kay, P.
(
2013)
The limits of (construction) grammar. In
T. Hoffmann, &
G. Trousdale (Eds.),
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 32–48). New York: Oxford University Press.
Norde, M.
(
2014)
On parents and peers in constructional networks. Paper presented at
Cogling Days
, Universiteit Gent, 11–12 December 2014.
[URL]
Petré, P.
(
2014)
Constructions and environments: Copular, passive and related constructions in Old and Middle English. New York: Oxford University Press.
Traugott, E. C.
(
1996)
Review of W. Pagliuca, (Ed.)
Perspectives on Grammaticalization
.
Cognitive Linguistics, 7(3), 301–306.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(
2013)
Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verveckken, K.
(
2015)
Binominal quantifiers in Spanish: Conceptually-driven analogy in diachrony and synchrony. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
Rodríguez-Abruñeiras, Paula
2020.
Example Markers at the Intersection of Grammaticalization and Lexicalization.
English Studies 101:5
► pp. 616 ff.
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.