Chapter 11
Change in category membership from the perspective of construction grammar
A commentary
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Categories: Creation and change
- 2.1The creation of a new category
- 2.2Category restructuring
- 3.Gradualness
- 4.The constructional network
- 4.1Links between constructions
- 4.2Constructionalization, constructional changes and categories
- 5.Concluding comments
-
References
References (22)
References
Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (2013). Morphology in construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 255–273). New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Colleman, T., & De Clerck, B. (2011). Constructional semantics on the move: On semantic specialization in the English double object construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 183–209.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic variation in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, D. (2013). Parts of speech: Solid citizens or slippery customers? Journal of the British Academy, 1, 151–185. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fonteyn, L., Heyvaert, L., & Maekelberghe, C. (2015). How do gerunds conceptualize events? A diachronic study. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 583–612. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M. (2015). From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward-strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 1–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, N. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its components and its fringes (pp. 21–42). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hudson, R. A. (1997). The rise of auxiliary do: Verb-non-raising or category strengthening? Transactions of the Philological Society, 95, 41–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kay, P. (2013). The limits of (construction) grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 32–48). New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norde, M. (2014). On parents and peers in constructional networks. Paper presented at Cogling Days
, Universiteit Gent, 11–12 December 2014. [URL]
Petré, P. (2014). Constructions and environments: Copular, passive and related constructions in Old and Middle English. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C. (1996). Review of W. Pagliuca, (Ed.) Perspectives on Grammaticalization
. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(3), 301–306.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verveckken, K. (2015). Binominal quantifiers in Spanish: Conceptually-driven analogy in diachrony and synchrony. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
Rodríguez-Abruñeiras, Paula
2020.
Example Markers at the Intersection of Grammaticalization and Lexicalization.
English Studies 101:5
► pp. 616 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.