Part of
Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages
Edited by Benjamin Lyngfelt, Lars Borin, Kyoko Ohara and Tiago Timponi Torrent
[Constructional Approaches to Language 22] 2018
► pp. 165181
References (53)
References
Apresjan, Ju. D. (1967). Èksperimental’noe issledovanie semantiki russkogo glagola [Experimental research on the semantics of the Russian verb]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Apresjan, Ju. D., & Pall, È. (1982). Russkij glagol – vengerskij glagol [Russian verb – Hungarian verb]. Budapest: Tankönyvkviadó.Google Scholar
Atkins, S. (1992). Tools for computer-aided corpus lexicography: the Hector project. In F. Kiefer, G. Kiss & J. Pajsz (Eds.). Papers in Computational Lexicography: Complex’92, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest (pp.1–60). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Baranov, A. N., Voznesenskaja, M. M., Dobrovol’skij, D. O., Kiseleva, K. L., & Kozerenko, A. D. (2009). Frazeologičeskij ob”jasnitel’nyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka (Phraseological explanatory dictionary). Moscow: ÈKSMO.Google Scholar
Belošapkova, V. A. (1977). Sovremennyj russkij jazyk. Sintaksis [Contemporary Russian. Syntax]. Moscow: Vysšaja škola.Google Scholar
Bystrova, E. A. (1997). Učebnyj frazeologičeskij slovar’ [Academic phraseological dictionary]. Leningrad: Prosveščenie.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endresen, A., Janda, L. A., Reynolds, R., & Tyers, F. M. (2016). Who needs particles? A challenge to the classification of particles as a part of speech in Russian. Russian Linguistics DOI logo.Google Scholar
Evgen’eva, A. P., Ed. (1999). Malyj akademičeksij slovar’ [Small academy dictionary]. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Fedosov, I. V. (2003). Frazeologičeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Phraseological dictionary of Russian]. Moscow: JuNVES.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1985). Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 11, 73–86.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, C. (1988). Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone . Language 64, 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Bernal, E. & DeCesaris, J. (2008). Border conflicts: FrameNet meets construction grammar. Proceedings of the XIII {EURALEX} International Congress. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [URL]Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A. (Ed.) (2013). Cognitive linguistics: The quantitative turn. The essential reader. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. A., & Divjak, D. (2008). Ways of attenuating agency in Russian. In A. Siewierska (Ed.), Impersonal constructions in grammatical theory, a special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 106, 138–179.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A., & Solovyev, V. (2009). What constructional profiles reveal about synonymy: A case study of Russian words for sadness and happiness . Cognitive Linguistics 20, 367–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the what’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75,1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Rundell, M., & Uì Dhonnchadha, E. (2006). Efficient corpus creation for lexicography: Building the new corpus for Ireland. Language resources and evaluation 40, 127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuz’mič, V. (2000). Žgučij glagol – slovar’ narodnoj frazeologii [Burning verb – a dictionary of folk phraseology]. Moscow: Zelenyj vek.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, J. (2015). Linguistic profiles: Going from form to meaning via statistics (= Cognitive Linguistics Research 53). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991a). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991b). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Constructional integration, grammaticization, and serial verb constructions. Language and Linguistics 4, 251–278.Google Scholar
Letučij, A. B. & Rakhilina, E. V. (2014). Načal’naja stadija grammatikalizacii značenij glagol’noj množestvennosti v kvazigrammatičeskix konstrukcijax [Early stage of grammaticalization of the meaning of vebal multiplicity in quasi-grammatical constructions]. In A. Moldovan & S. Tolstaja (Eds.), Slavjanskoe jazykoznanie. XV Meždunarodnyj s”ezd slavistov. Minsk, 21–27 avgusta 2103 g. Doklady rossijskoj delegacii [Slavic linguistics. XV International Congress of Slavists. Minsk August 21–27, 2013. Contributions by the Russian participants] (pp.432–451). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Lubensky, S. (1995). Random House Russian-English Dictionary of Idioms. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lyashevskaya, O. N. (2016). Korpusnye instrumenty v grammatičeskix issledovanijax russkogo jazyka. Corpus tools for Russian grammar studies. Moscow: LRC Publishing House.Google Scholar
Lyashevskaya, O., & Kashkin, E. (2015). FrameBank: a database of Russian lexical constructions. In M. Yu. Khachay, N. Konstantinova, A. Panchenko, D. I. Ignatov, & G. V. Labunets (Eds.), Analysis of images, social networks and texts. Fourth international conference, AIST 2015, Yekaterinburg, Russia, April 9–11, 2015, Revised selected papers (= Communications in computer and information science, Vol. 542) (pp.337–348). Springer.Google Scholar
Lyashevskaya O. N., & Sharoff, S. A. (2009). Častotnyj slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo jazyka (na materiale Nacional’nogo Korpusa Russkogo Jazyka) [Frequency dictionary of modern Russian (based on the Russian National Corpus)]. Moscow, Azbukovnik.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. (2011). Linguistic simplicity and complexity. Why do languages undress? Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meurers, D., Ziai, R., Amaral, L., Boyd, A., Dimitrov, A., Metcalf, V., & Ott, N. (2010). Enhancing authentic web pages for language learners. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA-5) at NAACL-HLT 2010 (pp.10–18). Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mixel’son, M. I. (1896–1912/2004). Bol’šoj tolkovo-frazeologičeskij slovar’ [Big explanatory phrazeological dictionary]. Moscow: ETS Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ovsjannikova, M. A. & Saj, S. S. (2014). Raznye formy, obščie mexanizmy: al’ternacija odno- i dvuxob”ektnoj diatez u russkix glagolov mental’noj sfery [Different forms, common mechanisms: the alternation of single- and double-object diathesis among Russian verbs expressing mental events]. In S. S. Saj, M. A. Ovsjannikova & S. A. Oskol’skaja (Eds.), ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA. Trudy Instituta lingvističeskix issledovanij RAN [Works of the Institute for Linguistic Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences] Russkij jazyk: grammatika konstrukcij i leksiko-semantičeskie podxody [Russian: construction grammar and lexico-semantic approaches] (pp.248–291). St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. (2000). Kognitivnyj analiz predmetnyx imen: Semantika i sočetaemost’ [Cognitive analysis of concrete nouns: Semantics and collocation]. Moskva: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
(Ed. ) (2010). Lingvistika konstrukcij [The linguistics of constructions]. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V. & Majsak, T. A. (2007). Glagoly dviženija i naxoždenija v vode: leksičeskie systemy i semantičeskie parametry (Verbs of motion and position in water: lexical systems and semantic parameters). In T. A. Kajsak & E. V. Rakhilina (Eds.), Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija [Verbs of motion in water: lexical typology] (pp.27–75). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V., Reznikova, T., & Bonch-Osmolovskaya, A. (2012). Towards a typology of pain predicates. Linguistics 50, 421–465.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V. & Letučij, A. B. (2012). Russkie konstrukcii s vremennym značeniem: o granicax nastojaščego vremeni [Russian constructions with temporal meaning: on the borders of present tense]. In V. I. Zabotkina (Ed.), Präsens: Sbornik naučnyx trudov [Präsens: Anthology of scientific works] (pp.224–242). Moscow: OLMA Media Grupp.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V. & Plungian, V. (2013). Time and speed: Where do speed adjectives come from? Russian linguistics 37, 347–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, R. J. (2016). Russian natural language processing for computer-assisted language learning. Doctoral Dissertation, UiT The Arctic University of Norway.Google Scholar
Rоgožnikova, R. P. (2003). Tolkovyj slovar’ sočetanij, èkvivalentnyx slovu [Explanatory dictionary of collocations that are equivalent to a word]. Moscow: AST, Astrel’.Google Scholar
Saj, S. S. (2008). K tipologii antipassivnyx konstrukcij: semantika, pragmatika, sintaksis [Toward a typology of antipassive constructions: semantics, pragmatics, syntax]. PhD dissertation. St. Petersburg: Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
(2014). Leksičeskie mečanismy grammatičeskogo drejfa: konstrukcii s dativnym sub”ektom v russkom jazyke XVIII–XXI vekov [The lexical mechanisms of grammatical drift: constructions with a dative subject in Russian in the XVIII–XXI centuries]. In S. Ju. Dmitrenko & N. M. Zaika (Eds.), ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA. Trudy Instituta lingvističeskix issledovanij RAN [Works of the Institute for Linguistic Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences] Studia typologica octogenario Victori Khrakovskij Samuelis filio dedicate (pp.568–610). St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Sazonova, I. K. (2008). Tolkovo-grammatičeskij slovar’ russkix pričastij [Explanatory and grammatical dictionary of Russian participles]. Moscow: АST-PRESS.Google Scholar
Švedova, N. Ju. (1960). Očerki po sintaksisu russkoj razgovornoj reči [Outlines of the syntax of conversational Russian]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Švedova, N. Ju., Arutjunova, N. D., Bondarko, A. V., Ivanov, V. V., Lopatin, V. V., Uluxanov, I. S., & Filin, F. P. (1980). Russkaja grammatika. II: Sintaksis [Russian grammar. II: Syntax]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Trudgill. P. (2011). Sociolinguistic typology. Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vajjala, S. (2015). Analyzing Text Complexity and Text Simplification: Connecting Linguistics, Processing and Educational Applications. PhD thesis, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, A. A. (1980). Grammatičeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Grammatical dictionary of Russian]. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Zolotova, G. A. (2006). Sintaksičeskij slovar’: Repertuar èlementarnyx edinic russkogo sintaksisa [Syntactic dictionary: The repertoire of elementary units of Russian syntax]. Moscow: Editorial URSS.Google Scholar
Žolkovskij, A. K., & Mel’čuk, I. A. (1965). O vozmožnom metode i instrumentax semantičeskogo sinteza [On a possible method and means for semantic synthesis]. Naučno-texničeskaja informacija [Scientific and Technical Information], 5, 23–28.Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia, Olga Blinova, Maria Khokhlova & Tatiana Sherstinova
2024. Towards the Description of Multiword Units in Russian Everyday Speech: State-of-the-Art and the Methodology of Further Research. In Digital Geography [Springer Geography, ],  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
van Trijp, Remi
2024. Nostalgia for the future of Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames DOI logo
Bychkova, Polina & Ekaterina Rakhilina
2023. Chapter 3. Towards pragmatic construction typology. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227],  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Coussé, Evie, Steffen Höder, Benjamin Lyngfelt & Julia Prentice
2023. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Constructional Approaches to Nordic Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 37],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Patel, Malin, Armine Garibyan, Elodie Winckel & Stephanie Evert
2023. A reference constructicon as a database. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11:1  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches, DOI logo
Prentice, Julia, Camilla Håkansson, Therese Lindström Tiedemann, Ildikó Pilán & Elena Volodina
2021. Chapter 12. Language learning and teaching with Swedish FrameNet++. In The Swedish FrameNet++ [Natural Language Processing, 14],  pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Endresen, Anna & Laura A. Janda
2020. Taking Construction Grammar One Step Further: Families, Clusters, and Networks of Evaluative Constructions in Russian. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Herbst, Thomas
2020. Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. Constructions and Frames 12:1  pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Herbst, Thomas
2022. Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. In Construction Grammar across Borders [Benjamins Current Topics, 122],  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Janda, Laura A., Anna Endresen, Valentina Zhukova, Daria Mordashova & Ekaterina Rakhilina
2020. How to build a constructicon in five years. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Ranta, Aarne, Krasimir Angelov, Normunds Gruzitis & Prasanth Kolachina
2020. Abstract Syntax as Interlingua: Scaling Up the Grammatical Framework from Controlled Languages to Robust Pipelines. Computational Linguistics 46:2  pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Nesset, Tore & Maria Nordrum
2019. Do Russian paucal numerals govern the genitive? Evidence from stress placement. Russian Linguistics 43:2  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.