References (66)
References
Alm, M., Behr, J., & Fischer, K. (In press). Modal particles and sentence type restrictions: A construction grammar perspective.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. by C. Emerson, & M. Holquist, In M. Holquist (Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bertoldi, A., Chishman, R., & Boas, H. C. (2010). Verbs of judgment in English and Portuguese: What contrastive analysis can say about Frame Semantics. Calidoscopio. 8(3), 210–225.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C. (2003). Tracing Dialect Death: The Texas German Dialect Project. In J. Larson, & M. Paster (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp.387–398). University of California, Berkeley: Linguistics Department.Google Scholar
(2005). Semantic Frames as Interlingual Representations for Multilingual Lexical Databases. International Journal of Lexicography, 18(4), 445–478.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). From the field to the web: implementing best-practice recommendations in documentary linguistics. Language Resources and Evaluation, 40(2), 153–174.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). The life and death of Texas German. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
(2010). On the equivalence and multifunctionality of discourse markers in language contact situations. In T. Harden, & E. Hentschel (Eds.), 40 Jahre Partikelforschung (pp.301–315). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
(2011). Zum Abstraktionsgrad von Resultativkonstruktionen. In S. Engelberg, A. Holler, & K. Proost (Eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik (pp.37–69). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Computational Resources: FrameNet and Constructicon. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.549–573). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C., & Pierce, M. (2011). Lexical Developments in Texas German. In M. Putnam (Ed.), Studies on German Language Islands (pp.129–150). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C., Pierce, M., Roesch, K., Halder, G., & Weilbacher, H. (2010). The Texas German Dialect Archive: A Multimedia Resource for Research, Teaching, and Outreach. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 22(3), 277–296.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C., & Weilbacher, H. (2006). The unexpected survival of German discourse markers in Texas German. In CLS 42–1, The Main Session. Papers from the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 1–15.Google Scholar
(2007). How Universal Is the Pragmatic Detachability Scale? Evidence from Texas German Discourse Markers. In F. Hoyt, N. Seifert, A. Teodorescu, & J. White (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Texas Linguistic Society IX Conference (pp.33–58). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Boas, H. C., & Ziem, A. (2018). Approaching German syntax from a constructionist perspective. In H.C. Boas & A. Ziem (Eds.), Constructional Approaches to Syntactic Structures in German (pp.1–46). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, W. (1978). Ausdrucksweisen der Sprechereinstellung im Deutschen und Englischen: Untersuchungen zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der deutschen Modalpartikeln und Vergewisserungsfragen und ihrer englischen Entsprechungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L., & Muntzel, M. C. (1989). The structural consequences of language death. In N. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating Obsolescence (pp.181–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M. (2003). Dynamics of Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donahue, F. E. (2009). Deutsche Wiederholungsgrammatik: A Morpho-Syntactic Review of German. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Durrell, M. (2002). Hammer’s German Grammar and Usage. 4th edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Dux, R. (2011). A frame-semantic analysis of five English verbs evoking the Theft frame. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin MA thesis.Google Scholar
Eichhoff, J. (1986). Die Deutsche Sprache in Amerika. In F. Trommler (Ed.), Amerika und die Deutschen (pp.235–252). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Eikel, F. (1954). The New Braunfels German Dialect. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp.111–138). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
(1986). Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.95–107.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T. S. (1992). Towards a frame-based organization of the lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer, & E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Lexical Organization (pp.75–102). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C. (2010). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp.313–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C., & Petruck, M. R. L. (2003). Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 235–250.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K. (2000). From cognitive semantics to lexical pragmatics: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O. (2005). Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1752–1778.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuller, J. (2001). The principle of pragmatic detachability in borrowing: English-origin discourse markers in Pennsylvania German. Linguistics, 39, 351–369.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(1), 34–45.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Glenn. (1972). Linguistic Atlas of Texas German. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006. Constructions at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A., & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80(3), 532–568.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Günthner, S. (2006). Was ihn trieb war vor allem Wanderlust. Pseudocleft-Konstruktionen im Deutschen. In S. Günthner, & W. Imo (Eds.), Konstruktionen in der Interaktion (pp.59–90). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Imo, W. (2007). Zur Anwendung der Construction Grammar auf die gesprochene Sprache – der Fall ‘ich mein(e)’. In V. Ágel, & M. Hennig (Eds.), Zugänge zur Grammatik der gesprochenen Sprache (pp.3–34). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. (2006). How well can well be translated? On the English discourse particle well and its correspondences in Norwegian and German. In K. Aijmer, & A.-M. Vandenbergen (Eds.), Pragmatic Markers in Contrast (pp.115–137). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? Construction. Language, 71, 1–33.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kearney, J. (2011). Nassau Plantation. Denton: University of North Texas Press.Google Scholar
Keevallik, L. (2006). From discourse pattern to epistemic marker. Estonian (ei) tea ‘don’t know’. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 29, 173–200.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K., & Lemoine, K. (2005). Definite null objects in (spoken) French: A construction grammar account. In M. Fried, & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions. Back to the Roots (pp.13–56). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Y. (Ed.). (2000). Discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Special issue of International Journal of Bilingualism, 4.4 , 437–561.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. (1998). Utterance Modifiers and Universals of Grammatical Borrowing. Linguistics, 36, 281–331.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, M. (2004). Deutsch in Texas. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Östman, J.-O. (2004). Construction Discourse. In J.-O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars (pp.120–144). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions in cross-language research: Verbs as pragmatic particles in Solv. In K. Aijmer, & A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen (Eds.), Pragmatic markers in contrast (pp.237–257). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Petruck, M. R. L. (1996). Frame Semantics. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp.1–13). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roesch, K. (2012). Language maintenance and language death: The decline of Texas Alsatian. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., & Michaelis, L. A. (2010). A Constructional Account of Genre-Based Argument Omissions. Constructions and Frames, 2, 158–184.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C., & Scheffczyk, J. (2010). FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. Retrieved from [[URL]].Google Scholar
Sag, I., Boas, H. C., & Kay, P. (2012). Introducing Sign-Based Construction Grammar. In H. C. Boas, & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp.1–30). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Salmons, J. (1983). Issues in Texas German Language Maintenance and Shift. Monatshefte, 75, 187–196.Google Scholar
(1990). Bilingual Discourse Marking: Code Switching, Borrowing, and Convergence in Some German-American Dialects. Linguistics, 28, 453–480.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmons, J., & Lucht, F. (2006). Standard German in Texas. In L. Thornburg, & J. Fuller (Eds.), Studies in Contact Linguistics – Essays in Honor of Glenn G. Gilbert (pp.165–186). Frankfurt/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (2004). New Dialect Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weydt, H. (1989). Sprechen mit Partikeln. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weydt, H., Harden, T., Hentschel, E., & Rösler, D. (1983). Kleine Deutsche Partikellehre. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
Zifonun, G., Hoffmann, L., Strecker, B., & Ballweg, J. (1997). Grammatik der deutschen Sprache (3 Vol.). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar