Part of
Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Martin Hilpert, Bert Cappelle and Ilse Depraetere
[Constructional Approaches to Language 32] 2021
► pp. 111
References (32)
References
Bergs, Alexander, & Diewald, Gabriele (Eds.). (2008). Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smirnova, Elena, Sommerer, Lotte & Gildea, Spike (Eds.). (2015). Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J., & Traugott, Elizabeth C. (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. (2010). Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Fleischman, Suzanne. (1995). Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. (2006). Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. Constructions+online, Special volume 1. [URL]. Accessed 14 June 2021.
Correia Saavedra, David. (2019). Measurements of Grammaticalization: Developing a quantitative index for the study of grammatical change. PhD Dissertation. Université de Neuchâtel.
De Smet, Hendrik. (2013). Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. (2019). The Grammar Network. How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. (2006). Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions+online, Special volume 1. [URL]. Accessed 14 June 2020.
. (2020). Paradigms lost – paradigms regained. Paradigms as hyper-constructions. In Lotte Sommerer, & Elena Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 278–315). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, & Smirnova, Elena. (2012). Paradigmatic integration: the fourth stage in an expanded grammaticalization scenario. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems, & Tanja Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and Language Change. New reflections. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 111–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga. (2007). Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. (2013). Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2016). Change in modal meanings: Another look at the shifting collocates of may . Constructions and Frames, 8(1), 66–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2019). Higher-order schemas in morphology: What they are, how they work, and where to find them. Word Structure, 12(3), 261–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann, & Björn Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred. (2000). Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tanja. (2001). Auxiliation. An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. (2012). Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neels, Jakob. (2015). The history of the quasi-auxiliary USE(D) TO: A usage-based account. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 5(2), 177–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens, Heltoft, Lars, & Schøsler, Lene (Eds.). (2011). Connecting grammaticalisation: The role of paradigmatic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko. (1995). Pragmaticization of meaning in some sentence-final particles in Japanese. In Masayoshi Shibatani and Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on semantics and pragmatics, (pp. 219–246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. (1984). The modals story retold. Studies in Language, 8(3), 305–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, Elena, & Sommerer, Lotte. (2020). The nature of the node and the network – Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Lotte Sommerer, & Elena Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 2–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, & Gries, Stefan, Th. (2003). Collostructions: investigating the interaction of words and constructions, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 57(1), 33–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. and G. Trousdale. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan, & Plungian, Vladimir A. (1998). Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2. 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zehentner, Eva, & Traugott, Closs E. (2020). Constructional networks and the development of benefactive ditransitives in English. In Lotte Sommer, & Elena Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 168–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar