This paper deals with the constructional network of
reported directive speech acts in German. It addresses two aspects of
modality and constructions by relating directly to questions raised in the
introduction to this volume: the notion of the paradigm in Construction
Grammar on the one hand and the nature of the links within the
constructional network model on the other. By investigating the network of
syntactic constructions of reported directives in German, the paper focuses
on the modelling of two types of horizonal paradigmatic links between these
constructions: the links between allostructions and the links between
paradigmatic choices. On the conceptual level, the paper argues that these
two types of paradigmatic links constitute two different types of horizontal
links in the network. On the empirical level, the study demonstrates how
these horizontal links manifest themselves in the corpus data.
2016Sentence
Types. In: The
Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, ed.
by Jan Nuyts and Johan van der Auwera. OUP, 141–165.
Audring, Jenny
2019Mothers
or sisters? The encoding of morphological
knowledge. Word
Structure 12(3), 274–296.
Axel-Tober, Katrin
2013Unselbständiger
dass- und
ob-VL-Satz. In Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach and Hans Altmann (eds.), Satztypen
des
Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 247–265.
Booij, Geert
2016Construction
Morphology. In: Andrew Hippsley and Gergory Stump (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology. Cambridge: CUP, 424–448.
Breindl, Eva
1989Präpositionalobjekte
und Präpositionalobjektsätze im
Deutschen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
2020Paradigms
lost – paradigms regained. Paradigms as
hyper-constructions. In Sommerer, Lotte, Smirnova, Elena (eds.) Nodes
and Networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 278–315.
2016Die
Grammatik. Band 4, Ed.
9. Mannheim: Dudenverlag (Der Duden in 12 Bänden).
Eisenberg, Peter
2006Der
Satz
2. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine, Kare Solfjeld & Anneliese Pitz
2018Der
Konjunktiv: Formen und Spielräume (Stauffenburg Linguistik Band
100). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
Glynn, Dylan
2014Correspondence
analysis: Exploring data and identifying
patterns. In Dylan Glynn, Justyna A. Robinson (eds.) Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy, John Benjamins, pp. 443–485.
Hilpert, Martin & Diessel, Holger
2016Frequency
effects in
grammar. In M. Aronoff (Ed.). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund
2007Speech
Act Distinctions in
Grammar. in Timothy Shopen (ed.) Language
Typology and Syntactic Description. vol.1: Clause
Structure. Cambridge: CUP, 276–324.
Lühr, Rosemarie
1994Zur
Konkurrenz von Konjunktiv und Modalverbfügungen im älteren
Deutsch. In Tromsö
University working papers on language and linguistics:
Nordlyd, 116–141.
Lühr, Rosemarie
1997Modalverben
als Substitutionsformen des Konjunktivs in früheren Sprachstufen des
Deutschen? Die Verhältnisse in der
Hypotaxe. In: Gerd Fritz, Rosemarie Lühr, Roswitha Peilicke & Thomas Gloning (Hgg.), Untersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen (Reihe Germanistische
Linguistik
187). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 177–208.
2008Die
Interaktion von Tempus und Modus: Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte
des deutschen Konjunktivs
30. Heidelberg: Winter (Germanistische Bibliothek).
Petrova, Svetlana
2013Der
Ausdruck indirekter Aufforderungen im Vergleich Althochdeutsch –
Neuhochdeutsch. Eine Fallstudie zur Entwicklung des Modusgebrauchs
im abhängigen
Satz. In: Franciszek Grucza (Hg.), Akten
des XII. internaitonalen Germanistenkongresses Warschau 2010:
Diachronische, diatopische und typologische Aspekte des
Sprachwandels; Interferenz-Onomastik; Sprachgeschichte und
Textsorten; Deutsche Dialekte und Regionalsprachen
(17). Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang, 45–52.
Pittner, Karin
2013Akkusativobjektsätze. In: Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach & Hans Altmann (Hgg.), Satztypen
des
Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 441–457.
Sadock, Jerrold M. and Zwicky, Arnold M.
1985Speech
Acts Distinctions in
Syntax. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language
Typology and Syntactic
Description, 155–196. CUP.
Smirnova, Elena
2016Die
Entwicklung des deutschen zu-Infinitivs: Eine
Korpusstudie. Beiträge zur Geschichte
der deutschen Sprache und
Literatur 138: 4, 491–523.
Smirnova, Elena
2017Deutsche
Komplementsatzstrukturen: Synchrones System und diachrone
Entwicklung. Heidelberg: Winter.
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
2020The
nature of the node and the network – Open questions in Diachronic
Construction
Grammar. In Sommerer, Lotte, Smirnova, Elena (eds.) Nodes
and Networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2–42.
Van de Velde, Freek
2014Degeneracy:
The maintenance of constructional
networks. In Boogaart, Ronny, Timothy Colleman, Gijsbert Rutten (eds), Extending
the scope of Construction
Grammar, 141–180. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Wickham, Hadley, Romain François, Lionel Henry & Kirill Müller
2018dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.7.5. [URL]
Zehentner, Eva
2018Ditransitives
in Middle English: on semantic specialization and the rise of the
dative alternation. English Language
and
Linguistics, 22(1), 149–175.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.