Cover not available
Part of
Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics
Edited by Natalie Depraz and Agnès Celle
[Consciousness & Emotion Book Series 11] 2019
► pp. 171–180

Chapter 9
Is surprise necessarily disappointing?

The article examines the function and status of surprise from Edmund Husserl’s phenomenological point of view on experience. Firstly, it is shown that, when experience is defined through concordance and continuity, it becomes difficult to describe surprise otherwise than as deception or disappointment. Secondly, the paper attempts to overcome this negative characterization of surprise without completely abandoning Husserl’s method and description. It is indeed shown that conflict is as important and irreducible as concordance and that experience should rather be defined, in a more dynamic manner, as the intertwining of both. The motivational link between the past and the future is then re-evaluated, in order to maintain a balance between the motivation of the past (expectation) and the open possibilities of the future (free anticipation). Thus, surprise can receive a legitimate and consistent place within experience, and a paradoxical expectation of surprise becomes conceivable.
Keywords: surprise, disappointment, Husserl, phenomenology, experience
Article outline
  • 1.Dissonance against harmony?
  • 2.Protention versus unexpectedness?
  • 3.Fulfillment or disappointment?
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.11.09ser
References (13)
References
Blumenberg, Hans. (2001). “Wirklichkeitsbegriff und Möglichkeit des Romans”. In Ästhetische und metaphorologische Schriften, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp. “The Concept of Reality and the Possibility of the Novel”, translation by David Henry Wilson, in New Perspectives in German Literary Criticism: A Collection of Essays, ed. Richard E. Amacher and Victor Lange, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Cantagrel, Gilles. (2008). De Schütz à Bach, Paris, Fayard/Mirare.Google Scholar
Dastur, Françoise. (2004). “Phénoménologie de l’événement: l’attente et la surprise (Husserl et Heidegger)”, in La phénoménologie en questions, Paris, Vrin, p. 161–173.Google Scholar
Depraz, Natalie. (2010). “Phenomenology of Surprise. Levinas and Merleau-Ponty in the Light of Hans Jonas”. In Advancing Phenomenology: Essays in Honor of Lester Embree, Dordrecht, Springer, p. 223–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. (2001). Sein und Zeit, Tübingen, Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. (1962). Gesammelte Werke – Husserliana, vol. IX: Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925, ed. by Walter Biemel, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff; Phenomenological Psychology. Lectures, Summer Semester, 1925, translation by John Scanlon, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1977.Google Scholar
. (1966). Gesammelte Werke – Husserliana, vol. XI: Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918–1926, ed. by Margot Fleischer, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff; Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis, translation by Anthony Steinbock, Dordrecht, Springer, 2001.Google Scholar
. (1972 [1948]). Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik, Hamburg, Meiner, ; Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic, translation by James Spencer Churchill and Karl Ameriks, Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
. (2001). Gesammelte Werke – Husserliana, vol. XXXIII: Die Bernauer Manuskripte über das Zeitbewusstsein (1917/18), ed. by Rudolf Bernet and Dieter Lohmar, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
. (2006). Gesammelte Werke – Husserliana Materialien,vol. VIII: Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929–1934). Die C-Manuskripte, ed. by Dieter Lohmar, Dordrecht, Springer.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. (2002). Étant donné. Essai d’une phénoménologie de la donation, Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1997; Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness, translation by Jeffrey L. Kosky, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Romano, Claude. (2007). “Attendre”, Conférence, n° 25, p. 529–556.Google Scholar
Welten, Ruud. (2011). “Petite métaphysique de la déception”, in Épreuves de la vie et souffrances d’existence, ed. by Sylvain Camilleri and Christophe Perrin, Argenteuil, Le Cercle Herméneutique, p. 137–156.Google Scholar