Cover not available
Part of
Sensory Experiences: Exploring meaning and the senses
Danièle Dubois, Caroline Cance, Matt Coler, Arthur Paté and Catherine Guastavino
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 24] 2021
► pp. 169–211

Chapter 5
Exploring speech experiences

Linguists, speakers, sounds and meanings

ORCID logo
Article outline
  • 5.1Is speech just sounds?
    • 5.1.1Speech as auditory phenomena: Categorical perception within discourse acts
    • 5.1.2Speech as an acoustic object: Speech signals
    • 5.1.3Representing speech sounds
  • 5.2Speech in the wild: Historical landmarks in linguistic field-work
  • 5.3Case study: Muylaq’ Aymara
    • 5.3.1Scientific positioning: Elaborating and rephrasing a research question
      • Where will I perform fieldwork?
      • Preparing to go from Amsterdam to Moquegua
    • 5.3.2Collecting speech sounds outside of the lab
      • 5.3.2.1Eliciting and recording speech sounds in the wild
        • Eliciting speech in Moquegua
        • Traveling from Moquegua to Muylaque for the first time
        • First impressions of Muylaque
        • Another failed attempt at eliciting speech
        • From subjects to participants
      • 5.3.2.2Transcribing speech sounds in the wild
        • Collaborative fieldwork
    • 5.3.3From collection to analysis of speech sounds
      • Why not just use features of the acoustic signal?
      • Why not just use the letters from (English, French) orthography?
      • Improved elicitation methods
  • 5.4A summary of methodological consequences
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.24.05col
References (33)
References
Askedal, J. O., Roberts, I., & Matsushita, T. (2010). Noam Chomsky and language descriptions (Vol. 2). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Báez, G. P., Rogers, C., & Labrada, J. E. R. (2016). Language documentation and revitalization in Latin American contexts (Vol. 295). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassin, B., Apter, E., Lezra, J., & Wood, M. (2014). Dictionary of untranslatables: A philosophical lexicon. Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., Ronat, M., & Viertel, J. (1979). Language and responsibility. Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Coler, M. (2014a). A grammar of Muylaq’ Aymara: Aymara as spoken in Southern Peru. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014b). The grammatical expression of dialogicity in Muylaq’ Aymara narratives. International Journal of American Linguistics, 80(2), 241–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coler, M., & Flores, E. B. (2013). A descriptive analysis of Castellano loanwords into Muylaq’ Aymara. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas, 13(1), 101–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coler, M., Guyot, P., & Banegas-Flores, E. (2020). Verbal art as heuristic for semantic analyses. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas, 20, e020011.Google Scholar
Crowley, T. (2007). Field linguistics: A beginner’s guide. OUP Oxford.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. (2010). Basic linguistic theory volume 1: Methodology (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
Evans, N. (2011). Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Maden, MA, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Everett, D. L. (2001). Monolingual field research. In P. Newman & M. Ratliff (Eds.), Linguistic fieldwork (pp. 166–188). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, W. A. (1997). Anthropological linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Malden/Blackwell Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (2000). Prosodic features and prosodic structure: The phonology of suprasegmentals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002). Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure: The Phonology of ‘Suprasegmentals’. Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Grinevald, C., & Sinha, C. (2016). North south relations in linguistic science: Collaboration or colonialism? In L. Filipovicć & M. Pütz (Eds.), Endangered languages and languages in danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. (2001). Ulwa (Southern Sumu): the beginnings of a language research project. In P. Newman & M. Ratliff (Eds.), Linguistic fieldwork (pp. 76–101). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Chomsky, N. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York, NY, USA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Harnad, S. (1987). Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: A critical overview. In Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 1–52). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2001). Fieldwork as a state of mind. In P. Newman & M. S. Ratliff (Eds.), Linguistic fieldwork (pp. 15–33). Cambridge University Press Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2012). A user’s guide to thought and meaning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. J. (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (2015). The linguistics of temperature (Vol. 107). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., Rakhilina, E., & Vanhove, M. (2016). The semantics of lexical typology. Routledge.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of experimental psychology, 54 (5), 358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, P., & Ratliff, M. (2001). Linguistic fieldwork. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Remijsen, A. (2001). Word-prosodic systems of Raja Ampat languages (Ph.D.). Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Sakel, J., & Everett, D. L. (2012). Linguistic fieldwork: A student guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E., & Mandelbaum, D. G. (1985). Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality (1949–1985) (Vol. 342). University of California Press.Google Scholar
Seifart, F., Meyer, J., Grawunder, S., & Dentel, L. (2018). Reducing language to rhythm: Amazonian Bora drummed language exploits speech rhythm for long-distance communication. Royal Society open science, 5(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2003). Linguistic categorization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vaissière, J. (2011). Proposals for a representation of sounds based on their main acoustic-perceptual properties. In J. A. Goldsmith, E. Hume, & L. Wetzels (Eds.), Tones and features, phonetic and phonological perspectives (Vol. 107, pp. 306–330). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, K., & Kellermeier-Rehbein, B. (2015). Colonialism and missionary linguistics (Vol. 5). Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar