The Language of Pain
Expression or description?
How is the universal, yet private and subjective, experience of pain talked about by different people in everyday encounters? What does the analysis of pain-related lexico-phraseological choices, grammatical structures, and linguistic metaphors reveal as to how pain is perceived and experienced? Are pain utterances primarily used to express or to describe this experiential domain? This is the first book that investigates such questions from both a functional and a cognitive perspective: it combines two converging usage-based theoretical models in a systematic linguistic inquiry of the construal of pain in everyday language. This work is based on a specialised electronic corpus of Greek naturally-occurring dialogues in a health care context, the underlying assumption being that in the absence of factual evidence intuition about language cannot reliably detect or predict patterns of usage. Comparing Greek with English data, this book significantly contributes to the development of this research field cross-linguistically.
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 9] 2007. xii, 238 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 1 July 2008
Published online on 1 July 2008
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | pp. xi–xii
-
Chapter 1. Introduction | pp. 1–8
-
Chapter 2. Pain and language | pp. 9–29
-
2.1. Introduction
-
2.2. The language of pain
-
Chapter 3. Corpus design and data collection | pp. 31–44
-
Chapter 4. Mode of analysis | p. 37
-
4.1. Introduction
-
4.2. Halliday's process types in modelling experience
-
Chapter 5. Data analysis and general discussion | pp. 45–57
-
5.1. Introduction
-
5.2. Pain: Process, participant or quality?
-
5.3. Key lexical items and their frequencies
-
Chapter 6. The construal of pain as process | pp. 59–101
-
6.1. Introduction
-
6.2. Foolen's account of the communication of emotions and pain behaviour
-
6.3. General characteristics of pain as process
-
6.4. Process types and structural functions in ponao constructions
-
Chapter 7. The construal of pain as thing-participant | pp. 103–132
-
7.1. Introduction
-
7.2. Grammatically construed semantic properties of ponos
-
7.3. Structural configurations featuring ponos as participant
-
Chapter 8. Pain and metaphor | pp. 133–181
-
8.1. Introduction
-
8.2. The conceptual grounding of ponos metaphors and their linguistic realisation
-
8.3. Lost for words
-
8.4. Concluding remarks
-
Chapter 9. Conclusions | pp. 183–196
-
-
Appendix A | pp. 207–213
-
Appendix B | pp. 215–218
-
Appendix C | pp. 219–232
-
Name index | pp. 233–234
-
Subject index | pp. 235–237
“Chryssoula Lascaratou’s book on pain language is a wonderful achievement. It synthesizes several different approaches in an attempt to understand the conceptual patterns underlying pain-related expressions in Greek. She is aware that no single approach can come to terms with the bewildering complexities of this universal phenomenon. She successfully integrates Halliday’s functional grammar with cognitive grammar and semantics, a bottom-up and a top-down methodology, and linguistics with philosophy. The result is a thorough, penetrating, and beautifully complex study of human suffering.”
Zoltán Kövecses,
Professor of Linguistics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
Cited by (50)
Cited by 50 other publications
Akita, Kimi
Rababah, Ghaleb, Kaouther Nesba, Sharif Alghazo, Nimer Abusalim & Mohammad Rayyan
Simone, Monica, Renata Galatolo & Alessandra Fasulo
Amberg, Amanda, Monique Crispin, Luis Koeppenkastrop, Imogene Munday & Alana B. McCambridge
Camerota, Filippo, Rachele Mariani, Giulia Cordiano, Michela Di Trani, Valentina Lodato, Alessandro Ferraris, Massimo Pasquini & Claudia Celletti
Munday, Imogene, Toby Newton-John & Ian Kneebone
Munday, Imogene, Toby Newton‐John & Ian Kneebone
Shunnmugam, Bairave, Tania Islam, Siamala Sinnadurai, Chua Seng Hui, See Mee Hong, Karuthan Chinna & Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
Berger, Sara E. & Alexis T. Baria
Galatolo, Renata & Alessandra Fasulo
Manfredi, Stefano
Munday, Imogene, Ian Kneebone, Kris Rogers & Toby Newton-John
Panagiotidou, Maria-Eirini
Sextou, Persephone
Sussex, Roland D
Bullo, Stella & Jasmine Heath Hearn
Bullo, Stella & Jasmine Heath Hearn
Gibbs, Raymond W.
Juda, Magdalena
Munday, Imogene, Ian Kneebone & Toby Newton-John
Fatteme Raiisi
Zhao, Yue, Norman Segalowitz, Anastasiya Voloshyn, Estelle Chamoux & Andrew G. Ryder
Bullo, Stella
Bullo, Stella
Ciapuscio, Guiomar Elena
Disney, Stephen J.
Moore, Alison Rotha
VUKOVIC, NIKOLA, FRANCESCA FARDO & YURY SHTYROV
Nguyen, Van Trao
2016. The cross-cultural analysis of the metaphorical conceptualization of happiness in English and Vietnamese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 275 ff.
Kerevičienė, Jurgita & Natalija Zaiceva
Viberg, Åke
Goddard, Cliff & Zhengdao Ye
2014. Exploring “happiness” and “pain” across languages and cultures. International Journal of Language and Culture 1:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Goddard, Cliff & Zhengdao Ye
2016. Exploring “happiness” and “pain” across languages and cultures. In "Happiness" and "Pain" across Languages and Cultures [Benjamins Current Topics, 84], ► pp. 1 ff.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M.
2014. Extending the description of process type within the system of transitivity in delicacy based on Levinian verb classes. Functions of Language 21:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Alexandridis, Athanasios
Segalowitz, Norman & Eva Kehayia
Doufas, Anthony G. & Lawrence J. Saidman
Semino, Elena
Semino, Elena
Sussex, Roland
Sussex, Roland
SUSSEX, Roland
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2019. Conclusion. In Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], ► pp. 235 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General