Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 10:1 (2018) ► pp.137


Anscombre, J. -C., & Ducrot, O.
(1977) Deux mais en français? Lingua, 43(1), 23–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arppe, A.
(2008) Univariate, bivariate and multivariate methods in corpus-based lexicography: A study of synonymy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki. Helsinki: Helsinki University Print. [URL].
Baayen, R. H.
(2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behaghel, O.
(1909/1910) Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen, 251, 110–142.Google Scholar
Berglund, Y., Hoffmann, S., Lee, D. & Smith, N.
(2002) BNCweb manual. [URL].
Blanco, E., & Moldovan, D.
(2013) Retrieving implicit positive meaning from negated statements. Natural Language Engineering, 20(4), 501–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
= British National Corpus (1991–1994) BNC Consortium. [URL].
Bolinger, D.
(1977) Meaning and form. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., & Baayen, R. H.
(2007) Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bouma, I. Krämer, & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Cappelle, B.
(2006) Particle placement and the case for “allostructions.” Constructions, 81 (Special volume 11).Google Scholar
Carston, R.
(1996) Metalinguistic negation and echoic use. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 309–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Negation, “presupposition” and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Journal of Linguistics, 34(2), 309–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charolles, M., & Lamiroy, B.
(2007) Du lexique à la grammaire : seulement, simplement, uniquement. Cahiers de lexicologie, 901, 93–116.Google Scholar
Chatar-Moumni, N.
(2008) Quelques aspects du fonctionnement de la négation en arabe marocain. La Linguistique, 44(2), 81–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croissant, Y.
(2013) mlogit: multinomial logit model. [URL].
Dik, S., Hoffmann, M. E., de Jong, J. R., Sie, Ing Djiang, Stroomer, H., & de Vries, L.
(1981) On the typology of focus phenomena. In T. Hoekstra, H. van der Hulst, & M. Moortgat (Eds.), Perspectives on Functional Grammar (pp. 41–74). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C.
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64(3), 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gates Jr., D. L., & Seright, O. D.
(1967) Negative-contrastive constructions in standard modern English. American Speech, 42(2), 136–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geurts, B.
(1998) The mechanisms of denial. Language, 74(2), 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(1978) Negation in language: Pragmatics, function, ontology. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp. 69–112). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glynn, D.
(2014) Correspondence analysis: Exploring data and identifying patterns. In D. Glynn & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (pp. 443–485). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Granvik, A., & Taimitarha, S.
(2014) Topic-marking prepositions in Swedish: A corpus-based analysis of adpositional synonymy. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 37(2), 257–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenacre, M.
(2017) Correspondence Analysis in practice. Third edition. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th.
(2003) Multifactorial analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A study of particle placement. New York & London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A.
(2003) Efficiency and complexity in grammars: Three general principles. In J. Moore & M. Polinsky (Eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory (pp. 121–152). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2015) From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 113–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Evert, S., Smith, N., Lee, D., & Berglund Prytz, Y.
(2008) Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb – a practical guide. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R.
(1985) Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language, 61(1), 121–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, S., Murphy, M. L., Paradis, C., & Willners, C.
(2012) Antonyms in English: Construals, constructions and canonicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroeger, P.
(2014) External negation in Malay/Indonesian. Language, 90(1), 137–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lê, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F.
(2008) FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1). [URL]. doi:  DOI logo
Lee, D. Y. W.
(2001) Genres, registers, text types, domains and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 37–72. [URL].
Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H.
(2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, N.
(2015) How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D.
(1991) Contrastive negation and metalinguistic negation. CLS, 27(2), 189–206.Google Scholar
Mughazy, M.
(2003) Metalinguistic negation and truth functions: The case of Egyptian Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(8), 1143–1160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M. L.
(2006) Antonyms as lexical constructions: Or, why paradigmatic construction is not an oxymoron. Constructions, 81 (Special volume 11).Google Scholar
Nenadic, O., & Greenacre, M.
(2007) Correspondence Analysis in R, with two- and three-dimensional graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(3). DOI logo. [URL].
Nevalainen, T.
(1991) BUT, ONLY, JUST: Focusing adverbial change in Modern English 1500–1900. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Paolillo, J. C.
(2002) Analyzing linguistic variation: Statistical models and methods. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Prince, E. F.
(1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–255). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Sheskin, D. J.
(2011) Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Silvennoinen, O. O.
(2017) Not only apples but also oranges: Contrastive negation and register. In T. Hiltunen, J. McVeigh, & T. Säily (Eds.), Big and rich data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and explorations. Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL].
Sinclair, J. McH.
(1987) Collocation: A progress report. In R. Steele & T. Threadgold (Eds.), Language topics: Essays in honour of Michael Halliday (pp. 319–331). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B.
(2004) On operationalizing syntactic complexity. In G. Purnelle, C. Fairon, & A. Dister (Eds.), Le poids des mots. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis. Louvain-la-Neuve, March 10–12, 2004, Vol. 21 (pp. 1032–1039). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
(2006) Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toosarvandani, M. D.
(2010) Association with foci. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Tottie, G.
(1991) Negation in English speech and writing: A study in variation. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., R. D.
(2005) Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasow, T.
(1997) Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change, 9(1), 81–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weller, S. C., & Romney, K.
(1990) Metric scaling: Correspondence Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeh, L.
(1995) Focus, metalinguistic negation and contrastive negation. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 23(2), 42–75.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Belligh, Thomas
Kuzai, Einat
2022. Negation as involvement: Building intersubjectivity via the Hebrew lo tagid construction. Journal of Pragmatics 189  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Silvennoinen, Olli O.
2023. Not Just Contrastive: Constructions with Negated Restrictives in English. Journal of English Linguistics 51:4  pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Taremaa, Piia, Helen Hint, Maria Reile & Renate Pajusalu
2021. Constructional variation in Estonian: Demonstrative pronouns and adverbs as determiners in noun phrases. Lingua 254  pp. 103030 ff. DOI logo
Zehentner, Eva
2021. Alternations emerge and disappear: the network of dispossession constructions in the history of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3  pp. 525 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.