Cover not available
Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 12:2 (2020) ► pp.206–238

Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar

The case of classifier xiē in Mandarin Chinese

 | University of Edinburgh
This paper suggests that xiē ‘some’ in Mandarin Chinese originated as a quantifier but became a classifier in the yi ‘one’ construction via realignment, or change in inheritance in diachronic construction grammar. This change has created yi xiē, semantically equivalent to xiē, therefore it is also a case of reinforcement in the sense of Jespersen’s Cycle. However, this study argues that yi xiē has not necessarily undergone grammaticalisation. Generalising the analysis, two types of reinforcement are proposed: reinforcement by innovation and by realignment. The former involves grammaticalisation, but the latter may not. The study highlights the importance of higher-level generalisations in language change.
Keywords: constructionalisation, constructional change, grammaticalisation, reinforcement, realignment, classifier, bare classifier, quantifier, xie
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Classifiers and the questions raised by xiē
    • 2.1Classifiers in Mandarin
    • 2.2 Xiē’s synchronic description
    • 2.3Previous analyses of (yi) xiē
  • 3.Diachronic construction grammar
  • 4. Xiē’s diachrony
    • 4.1A brief history of xiē
    • 4.2A constructional interpretation of xiē’s categories
  • 5.A realignment analysis
    • 5.1From [xiē np] qnt to [xiē np] bare
    • 5.2From [xiē np] bare to [yi xiē np]
    • 5.3 Bàn xiē and liǎng xiē
  • 6.Grammaticalisation, reinforcement, and realignment
    • 6.1 Yi reinforces diminutivity in xiē
    • 6.2What is grammaticalised in yi xiē?
    • 6.3Reinforcement and realignment
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 30 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00040.kuo
References (61)
References
Ahrens, K., & Huang, C. -R. (2016). Classifiers. In C. -R. Huang & D. Shi (Eds.), A reference grammar of Chinese (pp. 169–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun categorisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, K. (1977). Classifiers. Language, 531, 285–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biq, Y. -O. (2004). Construction, reanalysis, and stance: ‘V yi ge N’ and variations in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 361, 1655–1672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, W. (1999). Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages: Counting and beyond. In J. Gvozdanovic (Ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide (pp. 113–185). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, L. (2010). Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics, 14(1), 83–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cao, F. (2006). Yǔfǎhuà lúnhuí de yánjiū [On grammaticalization cycle]. Hànyǔ Xuébào [Chinese Linguistics], 14(2), 2–15.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. -R. (1968). A grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, I -H. (2017). The polysemy network of Chinese ‘one’-phrases in a diachronic constructional perspective. Constructions and Frames, 9(1), 70–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, P. (2003). Indefinite determiner introducing definite referent: A special use of ‘yi ‘one’ + classifier’ in Chinese. Lingua, 113(12), 1169–1184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. L.-S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colleman, T., & De Clerck, B. (2011). Constructional semantics on the move: Semantic specialization in the English double object constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(1), 183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coussé, E., Andersson, P., & Olofsson, J. (Eds.) (2018). Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (1994). Semantic universals in classifier systems. Word, 451, 145–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
(2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T., & Bowern, C. (2010). An introduction to historical linguistics (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1979). Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics, 17(1–2), 79–106.Google Scholar
De Smet, H. (2009). Analysing reanalysis. Lingua, 119(11), 1728–1755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Change through recombination: Blending and analogy. Language Sciences, 401, 80–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, U., & Waltereit, R. (2002). Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschri für Sprachwissenscha, 211, 151–195.Google Scholar
Dobson, W. A. C. H. (1962). Early Archaic Chinese. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Erbaugh, M. S. (1986). Taking stocks: the development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. In C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 399–436). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. (2018). Analogy: Its role in language learning, categorization, and in models of language change such as grammaticalisation and constructionalisation. In S. Hancil, T. Brebàn, & J. Vicente Lozano (Eds.), New trends in grammaticalisation and language change (pp. 75–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, M. (2015). Irregular morphology in regular syntactic patterns: A case of constructional re-alignment. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer, & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic construction grammar (pp. 139–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalisation in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2019). Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus- based perspectives on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. (1994). Phonogenesis. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp. 29–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. (2013). Chinese grammar at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iljic, R. (1994). Quantification in Mandarin Chinese: Two markers of plurality. Linguistics, 32(1), 91–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, L. J. (2015). Marking (in)definiteness in classifier languages. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics, 8(2), 319–343.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. D. (2004). Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalization theory. In O. Fischer, N. Muriel, & H. Perridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization (pp. 45–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Being exacting about exapting. In N. Muriel & F. Van de Velde (Eds.), Exaptation and language change (pp. 37–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, D. (1996). Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language, 72(3), 533–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Y. H. (2018). The development of three classifier constructions into degree adverbs in Chinese. In S. Hancil, T. Breban, & J. Vicente Lozano (Eds.), New trends in grammaticalisation and language change (pp. 315–331). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1995). Thoughts on grammaticalisation. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Li, X. (2013). Numeral classifiers in Chinese: The syntax-semantics interface. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, X., & Bisang, W. (2012). Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking. Lingua, 1221, 335–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Norde, M., & Trousdale, G. (2016). Exaptation from the perspective of construction morphology. In M. Norde & F. Van de Velde (Eds.), Exaptation and language change (pp. 163–195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ota, T. (2003). A historical grammar of Modern Chinese. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Petré, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2018). The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language, 94(4), 867–901. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, D. (2016). Nouns and nominal phrases. In C.-R. Huang & D. Shi (Eds.), A reference grammar of Chinese (pp. 199–255). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, C. (2001). Semantically conditioned shifts in Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale, 301, 133–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrent, T. T. (2015). On the relation between inheritance and change: The constructional convergence and the construction network reconfiguration hypotheses. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer & P. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic construction grammar (pp. 173–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.). (2010). Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Constructionalisation and constructional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, G. (2014). On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica, 48(2), 557–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, E. (2011). The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiedenhof, J. (2015). A grammar of Mandarin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, B., & Bisang, W. (2004). What makes grammaticalization? An appraisal of its components and its fringes. In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalizaation: A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 3–20). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yang, H. S.-F. (2005). Plurality and modification in Mandarin nominal phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Zhang, N. N. (2013). Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, D. (1982). Yufa jiangyi [Lectures on Grammar]. Beijing: Shāngwù Yìnshūguǎn.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Wu, Changlin & Changan Wu
2024. Complexity Analysis of Chinese Text Based on the Construction Grammar Theory and Deep Learning. ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing DOI logo
Law, James
2023. Constructional change and frameelement selection. Constructions and Frames 15:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. A constructional account of the loss of the adverse avertive schema in Mandarin Chinese. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. Morphosyntactic vagueness and directionality. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2022. Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Diachronica 39:1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. A constructional account of the loss of the adverse avertive schema in Mandarin Chinese. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.