Introduction
Discourse-level phenomena in construction grammars
Article outline
- 1.(Recent) advances in constructional research on discourse-level phenomena
- 2.Overview of the chapters in this volume
- 3.Implications and future directions
-
References
This article is available free of charge.
References (58)
References
Auer, P. (2011). ‘Online syntax and Construction Grammar: a perfect match? Some reflections on elliptical expansions.’ Paper Presented at the Workshop on Grammar and Interaction Revisited, Helsinki, March 10–12, 2011.
Boas, H. C. (2003). A Constructional approach to resultatives (Stanford Monograph in Linguistics). John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (2005). Construction-dependent morphology. Lingue e Linguaggio, 41, 31–46.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, L. J. (2008). The comment clause in English. Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brône, G. & Zima, E. (2014). Towards a dialogic construction grammar: Ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 457–495. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cappelle, B. (2017). What is pragmatics doing outside constructions? In I. Depraetere & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line (pp. 115–151). Springer International. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Smet, H. & Cuyckens, H. (2007). Diachronic aspects of complementation: Constructions, entrenchment, and the matching problem. In C. Cain & G. Russom (Eds.), Shaking the tree: Fresh perspectives on the genealogy of English (pp. 187–213). Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, J. W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enghels, R. (2018). Towards a constructional approach to discourse-level phenomena: The case of the Spanish interpersonal epistemic stance construction. Folia Linguistica, 52(1), 107–138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elvira García, W., Roseano, P. & Fernández Planas, A. M. (2017). Prosody as a cue for syntactic dependency. Evidence from dependent and independent clauses with subordination marks in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 1091, 29–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, N. (2007). Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Ch. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Ch. J. (1974/1981). Pragmatics and the description of discourse. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 143–166) (reprint of Berkeley studies in syntax and semantics, 1974). Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Ch. J. (1975). Santa Cruz lectures on deixis: 1971. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club. [(1997). Lectures on deixis. CSLI Lecture Notes 65. CSLI Publications.]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Ch. J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–137). Hanshin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, K. (2015). Conversation, Construction Grammar, and cognition. Language and Cognition, 71, 563–588. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fried, M. & Östman, J-O. (2005). Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1752–1778. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E. (2019). Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gras, P. & Sansiñena, M. S. (2015). An interactional account of discourse connective que-constructions in Spanish. Text & Talk 35(4), 505–529. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional change in English. Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, N. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal?. In W. Bisang, N. Himmelmann & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 19–40). Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffmann, T. (2013). Abstract phrasal and clausal constructions. In G. Trousdale & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 307–328). Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. (2011). Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent (pp. 22–44). Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaltenböck, G. (2013). The development of comment clauses. In B. Aarts, J. Close, G. N. Leech & S. Wallis (Eds.), The Verb Phrase in English. Investigating recent language change with corpora (pp. 286–317). Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kay, P. (1997). Words and the grammar of context. Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linell, P. (2009). Constructions in dialogue. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds), Contexts and Constructions [
Constructional Approaches to Language 9
] (pp. 97–110). John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marandin, J-M. (2006). Contours as constructions. Constructions, SV1-10/2006. [URL]
Nikiforidou, K., Marmaridou, S. & Mikros, G. K. (2014). What’s in a dialogic construction? A constructional approach to polysemy and the grammar of challenge. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 655–699. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Östman, J-O. (2005). Construction Discourse: A prolegomenon. In J-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. [
Constructional Approaches to Language 3
], 121–144. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Östman, J-O. & M. Fried. (2005). The cognitive grounding of Construction Grammar. In J-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. [
Constructional Approaches to Language 3
], 1–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Östman, J-O. (2015). From Construction Grammar to Construction Discourse… and back. In J. Bücker, S. Günthner & W. Imo (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik V. Konstruktionen im Spannungsfeld von sequenziellen Mustern, kommunikativen Gattungen und Textsorten (pp. 15–43). Stauffenburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sadat-Tehrani, N. (2008). An Intonational Construction. Constructions 3/2008. [URL]
Sansiñena, M. S. (2015). The multiple functional load of que. An interactional approach to insubordinate complement clauses in Spanish. University of Leuven dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sansiñena, M. S. & Elvira García, W. (2018). Using intonation to delimit grammatical constructions: the case of Chilean ‘que + indicative’. Paper presented at the ICCG10, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle and École Normale Supérieure, Paris, July 18th 2018.
Traugott, E. C. & G. Trousdale. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional change. Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C. (2018). Modeling language change with constructional networks. In S. Pons Bordería & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers. [
Studies in Pragmatics 18
] (pp. 17–50). Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Bogaert, J. (2009). The grammar of complement-taking mental predicate constructions in present-day spoken British English. Ghent University dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Bogaert, J. (2010). A Constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: Accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English language and linguistics, 14(3), 399–427. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van de Velde, F. (2014). Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (Eds.), The extending scope of construction grammar, Vol. 54 (pp. 141–179). Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zima, E. & Bergs, A. (2014). Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). 20161006. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Foolen, Ad
2023.
CONSTRUCTION PRAGMATICS IN A WIDER CONTEXT. AN ADDITION TO WEN (2022).
Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 21 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Atayan, Vahram & Bogdan Babych
2022.
Translating Argumentation: Distributional Semantic Analysis of Argumentation Resources in Parallel Corpora.
Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 119:1
► pp. 23 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.