Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 15:1 (2023) ► pp.5990
References
Baker, C., Fillmore, C. J., & Lowe, J.
(1998) The Berkeley FrameNet project. Proceedings of COLING-ACL, 1 1, 86–90. Retrieved from [URL]
Bertoldi, A., & Chishman, R.
(2012) Frame Semantics and legal corpora annotation: Theoretical and applied challenges. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 7 1, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C.
(2001) Frame semantics as a framework for describing polysemy and syntactic structures of English and German motion verbs in contrastive computational lexicography. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2001 conference, 64–73. Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2010) Contrastive studies in construction grammar. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C., Lyngfelt, B., & Torrent, T. T.
(2019) Framing constructicography. Lexicographica, 1 (35), 41–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C., & Ziem, A.
(2018) Constructing a constructicon for German: Empirical, theoretical, and methodological issues. In B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. Ohara, & T. T. Torrent (Eds.), Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages (pp. 183–228). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borin, L., Dannélls, D., Forsberg, M., Gronostaj, M. T., & Kokkinakis, D.
(2010) The past meets the present in Swedish FrameNet++. Proceedings of the XIV EURALEX International Congress, 269–281. Fryske Akademy.Google Scholar
Burchardt, A., Erk, K., Frank, A., Kowalski, A., Padó, S., & Pinkal, M.
(2009) Using FrameNet for the semantic analysis of German: Annotation, representation, and automation. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Multilinugal FrameNets in computational lexicography: Methods and applications (pp. 209–244). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W.
(1997) Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science, 21 (3), 247–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Czulo, O.
(2017) Aspects of a primacy of frame model of translation. In S. Hansen-Schirra, O. Czulo, & S. Hofmann (Eds.), Empirical modelling of translation and interpreting (pp. 465–490). Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Czulo, O., Ziem, A., & Torrent, T. T.
(2020) Beyond lexical semantic frames: Notes on pragmatic frames. In T. T. Torrent, C. Baker, O. Czulo, K. Ohara, & M. Petruck (Eds.), Towards a global, multilingual FrameNet (pp. 1–7). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, M., Ohara, K., Subirats, C., & Schmidt, T.
(2006) Frame-semantic analysis of motion scenarios in English, German, Spanish, and Japanese. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Construction Grammar, Tokyo, Japan.
Fillmore, C. J.
(1968) The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
(1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Hanshin.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C.
(2010) A frames approach to semantic analysis. The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 313–339. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C.
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of ‘let alone. Language, 64 (3), 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R. R., & Rhomieux, R.
(2012) The FrameNet Constructicon. In H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp. 309–372). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Y., Ohara, K. H., Lee-Goldman, R., & Fillmore, C. J.
(2006) Frame integration, head switching, and translation: RISK in English and Japanese. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG4), 1–14. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Heid, U.
(1996) Creating a multilingual data collection for bilingual lexicography from parallel monolingual lexicons. Euralex ’96 Proceedings, 573–590. Google Scholar
Kay, P.
(2002) English subjectless tagged sentences. Language, 78 (3) 453–481. Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laviola, A.
(2019) Constructicografia Multilíngue em Ação: Diretrizes linguístico-computacionais para o alinhamento de constructicons [Multilingual Constructicography in Action: Linguistic-computational guidelines for constructicon alignment]. PhD Dissertation, Federal University of Juiz de Fora.
Lyngfelt, B., Torrent, T. T., Laviola, A., Bäckström, L., Hannesdóttir, A. H., & Matos, E.
(2018) Aligning constructicons across languages. In: B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. H. Ohara, & T. T. Torrent (Eds.), Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages (pp. 255–302). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyngfelt, B., Borin, L., Ohara, K., & Torrent, T. T.
Ohara, K.
(2018) The relations between frames and constructions: A proposal from the Japanese FrameNet constructicon. In B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. H. Ohara, & T. T. Torrent (Eds.), Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages (pp. 141–163). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Finding corresponding constructions in English and Japanese in a TED talk parallel corpus using Frames-and-constructions analysis. In T. T. Torrent, C. Baker, O. Czulo, K. Ohara, & M. Petruck (Eds.), Towards a global, multilingual FrameNet. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ohara, K., Fuji, S., Ohori, T., Suzuki, R., Saito, H., & Ishizaki, S.
(2004) The Japanese FrameNet project: An introduction. Proceedings of the Satellite Workshop ‘Building Lexical Resources from Semantically Annotated Corpora’, 9–11. European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Oya, T.
(1999) Er bettelt sich durchs Land – eine one’s way Konstruktion im Deutschen? Deutsche Sprache: Zeitschrift für Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation 4(27), 356–369.Google Scholar
Padó, S., & Erk, K.
(2005) To cause or not to cause: Cross-lingual semantic matching for paraphrase modelling. Proceedings of the Cross-Language Knowledge Induction Workshop. Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., Baker, C. F., & Scheffczyk, J.
(2016) FrameNet: Theory and practice. Retrieved from [URL]
Subirats Rüggeberg, C., & Petruck, M.
(2003) Surprise: Spanish FrameNet! In E. Hajičová, A. Kotéšovcová, & J. Mirovský (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on Frame semantics. Matfyzpress.Google Scholar
Torrent, T. T.
(2015) On the relation between inheritance and change: The Constructional Convergence and the Construction Network Reconfiguration hypotheses. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer, & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 173–212). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrent, T. T., & Ellsworth, M.
(2013) Behind the labels: Criteria for defining analytical categories in FrameNet Brasil. Veredas, 17 1, 44–65.Google Scholar
Torrent, T. T., Ellsworth, M., Baker, C. F., & Matos, E.
(2018) The multilingual FrameNet shared annotation task: A preliminary report. In T. T. Torrent, L. Borin, & C. F. Baker (Eds.), Proceedings of the International FrameNet Workshop 2018: Multilingual Framenets and Constructicons. European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Torrent, T. T., Lage, L. M., Sampaio, T. F., da Silva Tavares, T., & da Silva Matos, E. E.
Torrent, T. T., Matos, E., Lage, L. M., Adrieli, L., Tavares, T., Gomes de Almeida, V., & Sigiliano, N.
(2018) Towards continuity between the lexicon and the constructicon in FrameNet Brasil. In B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. Ohara, & T. T. Torrent (Eds.), Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages (pp. 107–140). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willich, A.
(2022) Konstruktionssemantik: Frames in gebrauchsbasierter Konstruktionsgrammatik und Konstruktikographie. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziem, A., & Boas, H. C.
(2017) Towards a Constructicon for German. Proceedings of the AAAI 2017 Spring Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding (pp. 274–277). Stanford University.Google Scholar
Ziem, A., Boas, H. C., & Ruppenhofer, J.
(2014) Grammatische Konstruktionen und semantische Frames für die Textanalyse. In J. Hagemann & S. Staffeldt (Eds.), Syntaxtheorien: Analysen im Vergleich (pp. 297–333). Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Ziem, A., & Ellsworth, M.
(2016) Exklamativsätze im FrameNet-Konstruktikon am Beispiel des Englischen. In R. Finkbeiner & J. Meibauer (Eds.), Satztypen und Konstruktionen (pp. 146–191). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ziem, A., Flick, J., & Sandkühler, P.
(2019) The German Constructicon Project: Framework, methodology, resources. Lexicographica, 35 (1), 15–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar