Article published In:
Constructions and FramesVol. 15:1 (2023) ► pp.119–144
Constructional change and frame element selection
Insights from the French Spending frame
While most work in diachronic construction grammar considers individual constructional changes, these changes share an understudied relationship with broader changes at the level of the semantic frame. Literary corpus data shows that in the Spending frame in French, between the 12th and 20th centuries, the selection rates of four alternating frame elements shifted: Purpose, Cause of expense, Goods, and Seller. This frame-level shift is examined alongside related constructional changes including lexicalization, pejoration, and constructional loss. The analysis suggests that constructional change does not proceed independently but is driven by shifts in framing due in part to sociocultural changes.
Keywords: constructional change, semantic change, frame semantics, French, FrameNet, CoreSet, commercial transactions
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Diachronic construction grammar
- 3.The Spending frame
- 4.Data
- 5.Frame element selection
- 6.Constructional change
- 7.Discussion
- 8.Conclusion
-
References
References (46)
ARTFL-Frantext corpus. (2022). ATILF – CNRS & Université de Lorraine. [URL]
Bainville, J. (1931). Napoléon. Fayard.
Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Lowe, J. B. (1998). The Berkeley FrameNet Project. In P. Isabelle, L. Da Sylva, F. Fauteux, R. Kittredge, G. Lapalme, M.-C. L’Homme, & A. Thériault (Eds.), COLING-ACL ’98: Proceedings of the Conference, held at the University of Montréal (pp. 86–90). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software,
67
(1), 1–48. 
Bouso, T. (2020). The growth of the transitivising Reaction Object Construction. Constructions & Frames,
12
(2), 239–271.
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Candito, M., Amsili, P., Barque, L., Benamara, F., de Gael, C., Djemaa, M., & Vieu, L. (2014). Developing a French FrameNet: Methodology and first results. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, H. Loftsson, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Edition of the Language, Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 1372–1379). Reykjavik, Iceland: European Language Resources Association.
Coleman, J. (2005). Public reading and the reading public in Late Medieval England and France. Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar. Oxford University Press.
(2007). Construction Grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 463–508). Oxford University Press.
de Clari, R. (1924). La conquête de Constantinople. Paris: Champion. (Original work published 1216)
de Joinville, J. (1998). Mémoires ou Vie de saint Louis. Garnier Flammarion. (Original work published 1305)
de Livoy, T. (1788). Dictionnaire de synonymes françois. Second edition. N. Beauzée (Ed.). Nyon.
Djemaa, M., Candito, M., Muller, P., & Vieu, L. (2016). Corpus annotation within the French FrameNet: A domain-by-domain methodology. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, M. Grobelnik, B. Maegaard, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Edition of the Language, Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 3794–3801). European Language Resources Association.
Eisenstein, E. L. (1980). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press.
Elvira, J. (2011). Constructions of uncontrolled state or event: The increase in productivity of a new argument structure in Old Spanish. Constructions & Frames,
3
(2), 184–207.
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Hanshin.
(1989). Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In R. Dietrich & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 17–38). Elsevier.
Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C. R., & Petruck, M. R. L. (2003). Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography,
16
(3), 235–250.
Fried, M. (2007). A Frame Semantic account of morphosemantic change: The case of Old Czech věřící. In D. Divjak & A. Kochanska (Eds.), Cognitive paths into the Slavic domain (pp. 291–328). Mouton de Gruyter.
(2009). Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames,
1
(2), 261–290.
Froissart, J. (1962). Chroniques, livre premier. Droz. (Original work published 1399)
Georgakopoulos, T. (2018). A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry: Synchronic and diachronic evidence from Ancient Greek. Constructions and Frames,
10
(1), 61–97.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
Hamunen, M. V. J. (2017). On the grammaticalization of Finnish colorative construction. Constructions and Frames,
9
(1), 101–138.
Harris, J. & Reichl, K. (2012). Performance and performers. In K. Reichl (Ed.), Medieval oral literature (pp. 141–202). Mouton de Gruyter.
Hilpert, M. (2016). Change in modal meanings. Constructions and Frames,
8
(1), 66–85.
Hilpert, M. & Bourgeois, S. (2020). Intersubjectification in constructional change: From confrontation to solidarity in the sarcastic much? construction. Constructions and Frames,
12
(1), 96–120.
Koch, P. (1999). Cognitive aspects of semantic change and polysemy: The semantic space HAVE/BE. In A. Blank (Ed.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 279–305). Mouton de Gruyter.
(2000). Pour une approche cognitive du changement sémantique lexical: aspect onomasiologique. In J. François (Ed.), Théories contemporaines du changement sémantique (pp. 75–97). Peeters.
Kuo, Y. H. (2020). Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar: The case of classifier xiē in Mandarin Chinese. Constructions and Frames,
12
(2), 206–238.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Law, J. (2019). Diachronic frame analysis: The Purpose frame in French. Constructions and Frames,
11
(1), 42–77.
Martineau, F. (2008). Un Corpus pour l’analyse de la variation et du changement linguistique. Corpus,
7
(1), 135–155.
Martineau, F., Diaconescu, R., & Hirschbühler, P. (2007). Le Corpus Voies du français: de l’élaboration à l’annotation. In P. Kunstmann & A. Stein (Eds.), Le Nouveau Corpus d’Amsterdam (pp. 121–142). Steiner.
Mousket, P. (1836). Chronique. P. F. Dembowski (Ed.). Commission Royale d’Histoire. (Original work published 1243)
Noël, D. (2007). Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language,
14
(2), 177–202.
(2008). The nominative and infinitive in Late Modern English: A diachronic constructionist approach. Journal of English Linguistics,
36
(4), 314–340.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Reybaud, L. (1844). Jérôme Paturot à la recherche d’une position sociale. Paulin. (Original work published 1842)
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., Baker, C. F., & Scheffczyk, J. (2016). FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley, California. [URL]
Scarlini, B., Pasini, T., & Navigli, R. (2020). Sense-annotated corpora for word sense disambiguation in multiple languages and domains. In N. Calzolari, F. Béchet, P. Blache, K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerck, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 5905–5911). European Language Resources Association.
Traugott, E. C. (2016). Do semantic modal maps have a role in a constructionalization approach to modals? Constructions and Frames,
8
(1), 98–125.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press.
Trousdale, G., & Norde, M. (2013). Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: two case studies. Language Sciences,
36
1, 32–46.