Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 14:2 (2022) ► pp.226261
Aijmer, K.
(2004) The semantic path from modality to aspect: Be able to in a crosslinguistic perspective. In H. Lindquist & C. Mair (Eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English (pp. 57–78). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., & Zeschel, A.
(2010) Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 5 (1), 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.Google Scholar
Blumental-Dramé, A.
(2012) Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boogaart, R.
(2009) Semantics and pragmatics in Construction Grammar: The case of modal verbs. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp. 213–241). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, L., Ghesquière, L., & Van de Velde, F.
Bybee, J. L.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, B., & Depraetere, I.
(2016b) Response to Hilpert. Constructions and Frames, 8 (1), 86–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, B., Depraetere, I., & Lesuisse, M.
Clear, J.
(1993) From Firth principles. Computational tools for the study of collocation. In M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology. In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 271–292). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, J.
(1983) The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Collins, C., & Postal, P.
(2014) Classical NEG raising: An essay in the syntax of negation. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, P.
(2009) Modals and quasi-modals in English. Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cormack, A., & Smith, N.
(1998) Negation, polarity and V-positions in English. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 10 1, 285–322.Google Scholar
Cornillie, B., Marín-Arrese, J., & Wiemer, B.
(2015) Evidentiality and the semantics-pragmatics interface: An introduction. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 29 1, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990-present. Available online at [URL]
Dehé, N., & Kavalova, Y.
(Eds.) (2007) Parentheticals. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, I., & Kaltenböck, G.
(2018) Modal meaning and illocutionary force: A corpus based analysis of hedged performatives. Paper presented at AMPRA 4 (American Pragmatics Association), University at Albany, State University of New York, 1–3 November.
Depraetere, I., & Reed, S.
(2011) Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility. English Language and Linguistics, 15 (1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, I. & Verhulst, A.
(2008) Source of modality: A reassessment. English Language and Linguistics, 12 1, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffley, P. J.
(2000) Gerund versus infinitive as complement of transitive verbs in English: The problems of ‘tense’ and ‘control’. Journal of English Linguistics, 28 1, 221–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C.
(2008) Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42 (3), 375–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flach, S.
(2020) Beyond modal idioms and modal harmony: A corpus-based analysis of gradient idiomaticity in mod + adv collocations. English Language and Linguistics, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fong, R.
(2020) Is knowing the constructions enough to understand modality patterns in English?: A response to ‘Taming English modals – how a construction grammar approach helps to understand modal verbs’ by Sergio Torres–Martínez, English Today, 138, 35(2), 50–57, 2019. English Today, 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B.
(1975) Hedged performatives. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts (pp. 187–210). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
(2017) Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67 1, 155–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T.
(2008) Phraseology and linguistic theory: A brief survey. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 3–25). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Haan, F.
(2012) The relevance of constructions for the interpretation of modal meaning: the case of must . English Studies, 93 (6), 700–728. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2013) Die englischen Modalverben im Daumenkino: Zur dynamischen Visualisierung von Phänomenen des Sprachwandels. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 42 1, 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Change in modal meanings: Another look at the shifting collocates of may . Constructions and Frames, 8 (1), 66–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Construction grammar and its application to English. Second edition. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M., & Flach, S.
(2020) Disentangling modal meanings with distributional semantics. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, fqaa014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Homer, V.
(2015) Neg-raising and positive polarity: The view from modals. Semantics & Pragmatics, 8 1, 1–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. R.
(2001) A natural history of negation. Second edition. CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Hunston, S.
(2002) Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huschová, P.
(2015) Exploring modal verbs conveying possibility in academic discourse. Discourse and Interaction, 8 (2), 35–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, G.
(2019) Hedged performatives: Function and grammatical status. Paper presented at The syntagmatic properties of complementation patterns: Accommodating lexical and grammatical uses of CTP-clauses , Liège, 9–10 May 2019.
Kita, K., Kato, Y., Omoto, T., & Yano, Y.
(1994) A comparative study of automatic extraction of collocations from corpora: Mutual information vs. cost criteria. Journal of Natural Language Processing, 1 (1), 21–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leclercq, B.
(2019) On the semantics–pragmatics interface: A theoretical bridge between Construction Grammar and Relevance Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Lille.
(2020) Semantics and pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 34 1, 225–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leclercq, B., & Depraetere, I.
(2022) Making meaning with be able to: modality and actualization. English Language and Linguistics, 26 (1), 27–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leclercq, B., Cappelle, B., Depraetere, I. & Grandin, C.
(2023) Necessity modals and the role of source as a predictive factor. In I. Depraetere, B. Cappelle & M. Hilpert et al., Models of modals: From pragmatics and corpus linguistics to machine learning (pp. 121–151). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
(2012) Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, K.
(2018) Genre and constructional analysis. Pragmatics & Cognition, 25 1, 543–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J., & van der Auwera, J.
(Eds.) (2016) The Oxford handbook of modality and mood. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oakes, M. P.
(1998) Statistics for corpus linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Potts, C.
(2002) The syntax and semantics of as-parentheticals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20 (3), 623–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H-J.
(2020) The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R.
(1969) Speach acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M.
Torres-Martínez, S.
(2019) Taming English modals – How a Construction Grammar approach helps to understand modal verbs. English Today, 35 (2), 50–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tovena, L. M.
(2001) Neg-raising: negation as failure? In J. Hoeksema, H. Rullmann, V. Sánchez Valencia & T. van der Wouden (Eds.), Perspectives on negation and polarity items (pp. 331–356). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wärnsby, A.
(2002) Modal constructions? The Department of English in Lund: Working Papers in Linguistics, 21.Google Scholar
(2016) On the adequacy of a constructionist approach to modality. Constructions and Frames, 8 1, 40–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westney, P.
(1995) Modals and periphrastics in English. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S.
(2008) Rethinking idiomaticity: A usage-based approach. Continuum.Google Scholar
(2013) Words and idioms. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 274–289). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar