Biemann, C., & Giesbrecht, G. (2011). Distributional semantics and compositionality 2011: Shared task description and results. In Proceedings of the workshop on distributional semantics and compositionality (pp. 21–28). Portland: ACL. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H. C. (in press). Zur architektur einer konstruktionsbasierten grammatik der deutchen. In A. Ziem & A. Lasch (Eds.), Grammatik als Netzwerk von konstruktionen? Sprachliches wissen im fokus der konstruktionsgrammatik. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
Borin, L., Dannélls, D., Forsberg, M., Gronostaj, M.T., & Kokkinakis, D. (2010). The past meets the present in Swedish FrameNet++. In 14th EURALEX international congress (pp. 269–281). Leeuwarden: EURALEX.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. (2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (Eds.), pp. 49–69.
Bäckström, L., Borin, L., Forsberg, M., Lyngfelt, B., Prentice, J., & Sköldberg, E. (2013) Automatic identification of construction candidates for a Swedish constructicon. In Proceedings of the workshop on lexical semantic resources for NLP at NODALIDA 2013 (pp. 2–12 ). NEALT Proceedings Series 19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bäckström, L., Lyngfelt, B., & Sköldberg, E. (this issue). Towards interlingual constructicography. On correspondence between constructicon resources for English and Swedish.
Church, K. W., & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22–29.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evert, S. (2005). The statistics of word cooccurrences: Word pairs and collocations. Dissertation, Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, University of Stuttgart.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fano, R. M. (1961). Transmission of information: A statistical theory of communications. New York: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. (2008). Border conflicts: FrameNet meets construction grammar. In E. Bernal & J. DeCesaris (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIII EURALEX international congress (pp. 49–68). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R., & Rhomieux, R. (2012). The FrameNet constructicon. In H. Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 309–372). Stanford: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friberg Heppin, K., & Toporowska Gronostaj, M. (this issue). Exploiting FrameNet for Swedish: Mismatch?
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E. (2013). Constructionist approaches. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (Eds.), pp. 15–31.
Gustafson-Čapková, S., & Hartmann, B. (2006). Manual of the Stockholm Umeå corpus version 2.0. Stockholm University.
Halácsy, P., Kornai, A., & Oravecz, C. (2007). HunPos – an open source trigram tagger. In Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics companion volume: Proceedings of the demo and poster sessions (pp. 209–212). Prague: ACL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional change in English. developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M. (to appear). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.) (2013). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchinson, L. G. (1974). Grammar as theory. In D. Cohen (Ed.), Explaining linguistic phenomena (pp. 43–73). New York, etc.: Wiley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiang, C., Coenen, F., & Zito, M. (2013). A survey of frequent subgraph mining algorithms. The Knowledge Engineering Review 281, 75–105. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kay, P. (2013). The limits of (construction) grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (Eds.), pp. 32–48.
Kilgarriff, A., & Tugwell, D. (2002). Sketching words. In M.-H. Corréard (Ed.), Lexicography and natural language processing: A Festschrift in honour of B. T. S. Atkins (pp. 125–137). EURALEX.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nivre, J., Hall, J., Nilsson, J., Chanev, A., Eryiğit, G., Kübler, S., Marinov, S., & Marsi, E. (2007). MaltParser: A language-independent system for data-driven dependency parsing. Natural Language Engineering, 13(2), 95–135. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nivre, J., Megyesi, B., Gustafson-Čapková, S., Salomonsson, F., & Dahlqvist, B. (2008). Cultivating a Swedish treebank. In J. Nivre, M. Dahllöf & B. Megyesi (Eds.), Resourceful language technology: Festschrift in honor of Anna Sågvall Hein (pp. 111–120). Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Linguistica Upsaliensia 7.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ohara, K. (2013). Toward constructicon building for Japanese in Japanese FrameNet. Veredas, 17(1), 11–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pecina, P. (2010). Lexical association measures and collocation extraction. Language Resources and Evaluation, 441, 137–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svanlund, J. (2002). Lexikalisering [Lexicalization]. Språk och stil, 121, 7–45.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torrent, T. T., Lage, L. M., Sampaio, T. F., Tavares, T., & Matos, E. (this issue). Revisiting border conflicts between FrameNet and construction grammar: Annotation policies for the Brazilian Portuguese Constructicon.
Van de Cruys, T. (2011). Two multivariate generalizations of pointwise mutual information. In Proceedings of the workshop on distributional semantics and compositionality (pp. 16–20). Portland: ACL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wible, D., & Tsao, N.-L. (2010). StringNet as a computational resource for discovering and investigating linguistic constructions. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT workshop on extracting and using constructions in computational linguistics (pp. 25–31). Los Angeles: ACL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ziem A., Boas. H. C., & Ruppenhofer J. (in press). Semantische frames und grammatische konstruktionen für die textanalyse. In J. Hagemann & S. Staffeld (Eds.), Syntaxtheorien. Vergleichende analysen. Tübingen: Staffenburg.