In this paper we aim to show how distinct semantic and pragmatic layers of modal interpretation can be fruitfully integrated within a constructionist approach. We discuss in detail a number of cases from the Simpsons where a modal verb, as part of a longer expression, has a short-circuited interpretation, that is, where it is conventionally associated with a context-specific modal semantic value and, in some cases, with added pragmatic information. Short-circuitedness is evidenced by the humorous effect that is obtained when a character wilfully or unknowingly ignores standard aspects of interpretation of such a modal verb construction.
Aijmer, K. (1996). Conversational routines in English: Convention and creativity. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Boas, H. (2003). A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Boogaart, R., & Fortuin, E. (to appear 2016). Modality and mood in cognitive linguistics and construction grammars. In J. Van der Auwera & J. Nuyts (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boyd, J.K., & Goldberg, A.E. (2011). Learning what NOT to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language, 87(1), 55–83.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733.
Cappelle, B. (2014) Conventional combinations in pockets of productivity: English resultatives and Dutch ditransitives expressing excess. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman, & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar (pp. 251–282). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cappelle, B. (to appear). What’s pragmatics doing outside constructions? In I. Depraetere & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line. Amsterdam: Springer.
Carston, R. (2009). The explicit/implicit distinction in pragmatics and the limits of explicit communication. International Review of Pragmatics, 11, 35–62.
Chapman, S. (2011). Pragmatics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davies, M. (2008). The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. [URL]
Declerck, R., & Reed, S. (2001). Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Depraetere, I., & Reed, S. (2008). Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility in English. Paper presented at
ISLE 1
, Freiburg, 8-11 October 2008.
Depraetere, I., & Reed, S. (2011). Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility. English Language and Linguistics, 15(1), 1–29.
Depraetere, I. (2010). Some observations on the meaning of modals. In B. Cappelle & N. Wada (Eds.), Distinctions in English grammar, Offered to Renaat Declerck (pp. 72–91). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Depraetere, I. (2014). Modals and lexically-regulated saturation. Journal of Pragmatics, 711, 160–177.
Depraetere, I., & Salkie, R. (to appear). Saturation, free pragmatic enrichment, completion and expansion: A view from linguistics. In I. Depraetere & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line. Amsterdam: Springer.
Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 641, 501–538.
Fillmore, C.J., Lee-Goldman, R., & Rhodes, R. (2012). The FrameNet constructicon. In I.A. Sag & H.C. Boas (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 283–299). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A.E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, D., & Lakoff, G. (1971). Conversational postulates. Papers from
the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society
, 63–84. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Green, G.M. (2012). Pragmatics and natural language understanding (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 31 (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Jackendoff, R. (1997). Twisting the night away. Language, 73(3), 534–559.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGregor, B. (2015). Linguistics: An introduction. London: Bloomsbury.
Michaelis, L., & Lambrecht, K. (1996). Toward a construction-based model of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 721, 215–247.
Mitchell, K. (2009). Semantic ascent, deixis, intersubjectivty and modality. In R. Salkie, P. Busuttil, & J. Van der Auwera (Eds.), Modality in English: Theory and description (pp. 55–78). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Morgan, J.L. (1977). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. Technical report No. 52, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. [URL].
Palmer, F.R. (1990). Modality and the English modals (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Papafragou, A. (2000). Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Watts, R.J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, G.H. von. (1951). An essay in modal logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Zwicky, A.M., & Sadock, J.M. (1975). Ambiguity tests and how to tail them. In J.P. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 41 (pp. 1–36). New York: Academic Press.
Cited by (18)
Cited by 18 other publications
Morin, Cameron, Jack Grieve & Toqir Rana
2024. The semantics, sociolinguistics, and origins of double modals in American English: New insights from social media. PLOS ONE 19:1 ► pp. e0295799 ff.
2019. Meaning in Context and Contextual Meaning: A Perspective on the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface Applied to Modal Verbs. Anglophonia :28
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
2018. Constructions as Triads of Form, Function, and Agency: An Agentive Cognitive Construction Grammar Study of English Modals. Cognitive Semantics 4:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
2023. Grammaire agentielle cognitive de constructions. Signata :14
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
2023. The semiotics of motion encoding in Early English: a cognitive semiotic analysis of phrasal verbs in Old and Middle English. Semiotica 2023:251 ► pp. 55 ff.
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
2024. Embodied human language models vs. Large Language Models, or why Artificial Intelligence cannot explain the modal be able to. Biosemiotics 17:1 ► pp. 185 ff.
Torres–Martínez, Sergio
2019. Taming English modals. English Today 35:2 ► pp. 50 ff.
Cappelle, Bert
2017. What’s Pragmatics Doing Outside Constructions?. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11], ► pp. 115 ff.
Cappelle, Bert
2020. Not on my watch and similar not-fragments: stored forms with pragmatic content. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52:2 ► pp. 217 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.