References (38)
Adger, D. (2013). Constructions and grammatical explanation: Comments on Goldberg. Mind and Language, 28(4), 466–478.
Bencini, G. (2013). Psycholinguistics. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 379–396). New York: OUP.
Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Bybee, J. (2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). New York: OUP.
Croft, W. (2010). Commentary on Cristofaro – What do semantic maps tell us? Linguistic Discovery, 8(1), 53–60.
Croft, W. (2013). Radical Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 211–232). New York: OUP.
De Smet, H., Ghesquière, L., & Van de Velde, F. (Eds.). (2013). On multiple sources in language change. Special issue of Studies in Language, 37(3).
Denison, D., & Cort, A. (2010).
Better as a verb. In H. Cuyckens, K. Davidse, & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp. 349–383). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Eide, K. (2002). Norwegian modals. PhD dissertation. Department of Linguistics, NTNU, Trondheim.
Fischer, O. (2007). Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: OUP.
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A.E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: OUP.
Goldberg, A.E. (2013a). Argument structure constructions versus lexical rules or derivational templates. Mind and Language, 28(4), 435–365.
Goldberg, A.E. (2013b). Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 15–31). New York: OUP.
Hilpert, M. (2015). From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward-strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 1–36.
Holmberg, A. (2010). Referring to yourself in self-talk. In C. J-W. Zwart & M. de Vries (Eds.), Structure preserved: Studies in syntax for Jan Koster (pp. 185–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hudson, R. (2007). Language networks: The new word grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Hudson, R. (2010). An introduction to word grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
Kay, P. (2004). Pragmatic aspects of grammatical constructions. In G. Ward & L. Horn (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 675–700). Oxford: Blackwell.
Lambrecht, K. (2001). A framework for the analysis of cleft-constructions. Linguistics, 391, 463–516.
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Patten, A. (2012). The English IT-cleft: A constructional account and a diachronic investigation. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Sag, I. (2010). English filler-gap constructions. Language, 86(3), 486–545.
Sag, I. (2012). Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In H.C Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 69–202). Stanford: CSLI.
Stefanowitsch, A. (2013). Collostructional analysis. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 290–306). New York: OUP.
Townsend, S. (1992). The Queen and I. London: Methuen.
van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V.A. (1998). Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 21, 79–124.
van Trijp, R., & Steels, L. (2012). Multilevel alignment maintains language systematicity. Advances in Complex Systems, 15(3-4). [URL].
Warner, A. (1993). English auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: CUP.
Wärnsby, A. (2002). Modal constructions? Lund Working Papers in Linguistics, 21. Lund: Department of English Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.