Article published In:
Modal Meaning in Construction Grammar
Edited by Bert Cappelle and Ilse Depraetere
[Constructions and Frames 8:1] 2016
► pp. 5465
References
Aarts, B
(2004) Modelling linguistic gradience. Studies in Language, 28(1), 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) In defence of distributional analysis, pace Croft. Studies in Language, 31(2), 431–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, D
(2013) Constructions and grammatical explanation: Comments on Goldberg. Mind and Language, 28(4), 466–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencini, G
(2013) Psycholinguistics. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 379–396). New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G
(Eds.) (2009) Contexts and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boogaart, R
(2009) Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar: The case of modal verbs. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp. 213–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G
(2010) Construction morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, J
(2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Croft, W
(2007) Beyond Aristotle and gradience: A reply to Aarts. Studies in Language, 31(2), 409–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Commentary on Cristofaro – What do semantic maps tell us? Linguistic Discovery, 8(1), 53–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Radical Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 211–232). New York: OUP.Google Scholar
De Smet, H., Ghesquière, L., & Van de Velde, F
(Eds.) (2013) On multiple sources in language change. Special issue of Studies in Language, 37(3).Google Scholar
Denison, D., & Cort, A
(2010)  Better as a verb. In H. Cuyckens, K. Davidse, & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp. 349–383). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eide, K
(2002) Norwegian modals. PhD dissertation. Department of Linguistics, NTNU, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Fischer, O
(2007) Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fried, M
(2009) Repersenting contextual factors in language change. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp. 63–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2013a) Argument structure constructions versus lexical rules or derivational templates. Mind and Language, 28(4), 435–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b) Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 15–31). New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M
(2015) From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward-strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A
(2010) Referring to yourself in self-talk. In C. J-W. Zwart & M. de Vries (Eds.), Structure preserved: Studies in syntax for Jan Koster (pp. 185–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R
(2007) Language networks: The new word grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2010) An introduction to word grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P
(2004) Pragmatic aspects of grammatical constructions. In G. Ward & L. Horn (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 675–700). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K
(2001) A framework for the analysis of cleft-constructions. Linguistics, 391, 463–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Patten, A
(2012) The English IT-cleft: A constructional account and a diachronic investigation. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I
(2010) Grammaticalization, the clausal hierarchy and semantic bleaching. In E.C. Traugott & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp. 45–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sag, I
(2010) English filler-gap constructions. Language, 86(3), 486–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In H.C Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 69–202). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A
(2013) Collostructional analysis. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 290–306). New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Townsend, S
(1992) The Queen and I. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V.A
(1998) Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 21, 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Trijp, R., & Steels, L
(2012) Multilevel alignment maintains language systematicity. Advances in Complex Systems, 15(3-4). [URL]. DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, A
(1993) English auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wärnsby, A
(2002) Modal constructions? Lund Working Papers in Linguistics, 21. Lund: Department of English Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Daugs, Robert
Daugs, Robert
2021. Contractions, constructions and constructional change. In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32],  pp. 12 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.