Article published In:
MetaNet
Edited by Miriam R.L. Petruck
[Constructions and Frames 8:2] 2016
► pp. 141165
References
Boas, H
Brooke–Rose, C
(1958) A grammar of metaphor. London: Secker and Warburg Ltd.Google Scholar
Cameron, L
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Croft, W
(2003) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 161–206). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A
(2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernst, T
(1984) Towards an integrated theory of adverb position in English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
(2001) The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J
(1982) Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
FrameNet
(2015) FrameNet Release 1.6. Freely available as a download from the FrameNet project. Updated data available at [URL] (accessed July 2015).
Gibbs, R.W. Jr., & Tendahl, M
(2006) Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind and Language, 21(3), 379–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. I1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. II1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J
(1998) On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics, 301, 259–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M.R.L., Johnson, C.R., & Scheffczyk, J
(2016) FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice (“The Book”). Web publication available via [URL].
Steen, G., Dorst, A.G., Kaal, A., Herrmann, J.B., & Krennmayr, T
Sullivan, K
(2009) Grammatical constructions in metaphoric language. In B. Lewandowska–Tomaszczyk & K. Dziwirek (Eds.), Cognitive corpus linguistics (pp. 57–80). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.R
(1989) Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, M
(1987) Death is the mother of beauty: Mind, metaphor, criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Colston, Herbert L.
2019. How Language Makes Meaning, DOI logo
Dalpanagioti, Thomai
2021. A Frame-Inspired Task-Based Approach to Metaphor Teaching. Lexis :18 DOI logo
DAVID, OANA & TEENIE MATLOCK
2018. Cross-linguistic automated detection of metaphors for poverty and cancer. Language and Cognition 10:3  pp. 467 ff. DOI logo
Engelberg, Stefan, Françoise Gallez & Manon Hermann
2022. Musterhafte Strukturen im Bereich von Metaphern und Metonymien. In Cognition and Contrast,  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán
2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, DOI logo
Law, James
2022. Metonymy and argument alternations in French communication frames. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2  pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
Lederer, Jenny
2019. Lexico-grammatical alignment in metaphor construal. Cognitive Linguistics 30:1  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Xiaoyu, Shi, Heidi H. & Zhuo, Jing-Schmidt
2020. Manual Action Metaphors in Chinese A Usage-Based Constructionist Study. In Corpus-Based Research on Chinese Language and Linguistics [Sinica venetiana, 6], DOI logo
Sullivan, Karen
2023. Three levels of framing. WIREs Cognitive Science 14:5 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.