Cover not available
Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 9:1 (2017) ► pp.70–100

The polysemy network of Chinese ‘one’-phrases in a diachronic constructional perspective

 | University of California, Berkeley
This study investigates the development of a polysemy network within a constructional framework. The synchronic variation of Chinese ‘one’-phrases is explained by diachronic developments. The results of a quantitative corpus analysis show that each of the senses of the ‘one’ phrase tends to occur in specific syntactic constructions due to inheritance from extant constructions. The results contribute to explaining the formation of a diachronic polysemy network by investigating the hierarchical structure of its constructions, thus allowing a deeper understanding of how semantic extensions have been formed through gradual constructional association.
Keywords: numeral phrases, polysemy network, information structure, polarity items, constructionalization, Chinese, corpus study
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Synchronic polysemy
  • 3.Diachronic construction-based changes
    • 3.1 Dian ‘dot’ in Old Chinese and Middle Chinese: counting and measuring
    • 3.2The ‘one’-phrase in Early Mandarin
      • 3.2.1The development of the PPI sense of ‘one’-phrases in Early Mandarin Chinese
      • 3.2.2The development of the NPI sense of ‘one’-phrases in Early Mandarin Chinese
        • 3.2.2.1The minimizer sense in preverbal position
        • 3.2.2.2The minimizer sense in the postverbal position
      • 3.2.3Category expansion: Adverbials
  • 4.Expansion of the polysemous network across periods
    • 4.1A constructional perspective on diachronic changes
    • 4.2Diachronic association of the ‘one’-phrase with extant constructions
    • 4.3Directionality in productivity, schematicity, and compositionality
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 20 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.9.1.03che
References (39)
References
Baker, C. L. (1970). Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 169–186.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y. -R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. D. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1975). Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 61, 353–375.Google Scholar
Francis, E. J., & Michaelis, L. A. (2003). Mismatch: A crucible for linguistic theory. In E. J. Francis & L. A. Mchaelis (Eds.), Mismatch: Form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar (pp.1–27). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Fried, M. (2008). Constructions and constructs: Mapping a diachronic process. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language changes (pp.47–79). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, L. (2009). Numeral classifiers and the structure of DP. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, A. (2011). Positive polarity items and negative polarity items: Variation, licensing, and compositionality. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp.1660–1712). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, A., & Campbell, L. (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistics perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd revised ed. Original edition 1993. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. J. (1987). Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In E. J. Reuland & A. G. B. ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp.226–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hsiao, S. -Y. (2002). Negative sensitivity in Chinese: A comparative study of Mandarin Chinese and Holo Taiwanese. Ph.D. Dissertation, National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. J., Li, Y. -H. A., & Li, Y. (2009). Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, M. (2011). The grammar of polarity: Pragmatics, sensitivity and the logic of scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1909[1949]). A modern English grammar on historical principles. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2011). Grammaticalization and cognitive grammar. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 79–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Liu, S. (1965). Wei Jin Nanbei Chao liangci yanjiu [A study of classifiers of the Wei Jin and Northern and Southern Dynasties]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Lü, S. (1985). Jindai hanyu zhidaici [The pronouns of vernacular Chinese]. Shanghsi: Xuelin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Norman, J. (1988). Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Packard, J. L. (2000). The morphology of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, W. 2015. Adverbs. In R. Sybesma (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics. Consulted online on 31 October 2016 < DOI logo>.Google Scholar
Peyraube, A. (1996). Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In C. -T. J. Huang & Y. -H. A. Li (Eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics (pp.161–213). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L. (2005). Negative and positive feature checking and the distribution of polarity items. In S. Brown and A. Przepiórkowski (Eds.), Negation in Slavic (pp.179–217). Bloomington, Indiana: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. (2004). Positive polarity – negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 221, 409–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, A., Whang, J., & Zu, V. (2014). Quantifier words and their multi-functional(?) parts. Language and Linguistics, 15(1), 115–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsai, W- T. Dylan. (2004). On formal semantics of zhi and lian in Chinese. Zhougguo Yuwen [Chinese Language], 21, 99–111.Google Scholar
Wei, P. -C. (2000). Donghan wei jin nan bei chao zai yufashi shang de diwei [The position of the Eastern Han and Six Dynasties in the history of Chinese grammar]. Hanxue Yanjiu [Chinese Studies], 11, 199–230.Google Scholar
(2003). Shanggu han yu dao zhonggu hanyu yufa de zhongyao fazhan [The important developments of grammar from Old Chinese to Middle Chinese]. Di san jie guoji hanxue huiyi lunwenji [Proceeding of the third international symposium of Chinese studies], 75–106. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Xiang, M. (2008). Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin dou . Journal of East Asian Linguist, 171, 227–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, N. (2000). Object shift in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 28(2), 201–246.Google Scholar
(2013). Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2020. Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. Morphosyntactic vagueness and directionality. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
KUO, YUEH HSIN
2024. Bidirectional grammaticalization: Chinese modal and conditional. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.