Cover not available
Part of
Landscapes of Realism: Rethinking literary realism in comparative perspectives
Edited by Svend Erik Larsen, Steen Bille Jørgensen and Margaret R. Higonnet
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXIII] 2022
► pp. 385–403

Caricature and realism

| Aarhus University
The two dynamic centers of caricature in the nineteenth century were England and France. Here, censorship was flexible enough to create a space for public satire targeting both the new and old social classes and types in the emergent modern society. The satirists mock the elite holding the political and economic power, and do so with an attitude ranging from roaring laughter to a discreet smile. With a both verbal and visual dimension, caricatures became part of the satire in both visual prints and printed texts, not least in the new journals, newspapers and magazines that flourished in the nineteenth century based on new reproductive technologies and a growing readership, an urban readership in particular. Caricatures found their topics in all corners of society and approached indiscriminately high and low, crowds and individual, politics and daily habits, traditions and transitory phenomena in a mixture of laughter and afterthought. With readings in Nikolai Gogol’s Mertvye Dushi (1842), Charles Baudelaire’s essays on laughter and caricature (1855–1857) and visual caricatures by James Gillray, Grandville and an anonymous caricaturist, this case study will focus on caricatures of people and objects. The main problems to be discussed concern the contribution of caricatures to the reshaping of the understanding of human identity and of the material universe of the modern world.
Keywords: caricature, stereotyping, laughter, censorship, Charles Baudelaire, Nikolai Gogol, James Gillray, Charles Philipon, realism
Article outline
  • 1.Ambiguous stereotyping
  • 2.Being oneself and another
  • 3.Caricature as public engagement
  • 4.Is this caricature?
  • Notes
  • Works cited
Published online: 16 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxiii.10lar
References (27)
Works cited
Appelbaum, Stanley and Richard Kelly, eds. 1981. Great Drawing and Illustrations from Punch, 1841–1901. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. 1980a. “De l’essence du rire” [1855]. In Œuvres complètes, edited by Claude Roy and Michel Jamet, 690–701. Paris: Laffont.Google Scholar
. 1980b. “Quelques caricaturistes français” and “Quelques caricaturistes étrangers” [1857]. In Œuvres complètes, edited by Claude Roy and Michel Jamet, 702–21. Paris: Laffont.Google Scholar
Billing, Michael. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Toward a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bindman, David. 2003. “How the French became frogs: English caricature and a national stereotype.” Apollo 158.498: 15–25.Google Scholar
Champfleury (Jules François Félix Husson). 1857. Le réalisme. Paris: Michel Lévy frères.Google Scholar
Compagnon, Antoine. 2017. Les Chiffonniers de Paris. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Daumier Register. 2020. The Daumier Register. Accessed July 26, 2020. [URL]
Doizy, Guillaume and Jacky Houdré. 2008. Marianne dans tous ses états: la République en caricature de Daumier à Plantu. Paris: Alternatives.Google Scholar
Gogol, Nikolai. 2008. Mertvye dushi [1842]. Moscow: Eksmo.Google Scholar
. 2010. Dead Souls, translated by Isabel Hapgood. Ware: Wordsworth.Google Scholar
Goode, Mike. 2016. “The Public and the Limits of Persuasion in the Age of Caricature.” In The Efflorescence of Caricature, 1759–1838, edited by Todd Porterfield, 117–36. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grandville. 1844. Un Autre Monde. Paris: Fournier.Google Scholar
Hannoosh, Michele. 1992. Baudelaire and Caricature: From the Comic to an Art of Modernity. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Haywood, Ian. 2020. The Rise of Victorian Caricature. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Werner. 1956. Die Karikatur von Leonardo bis Picasso. Vienna: Rosenbaum.Google Scholar
Kerr, David. 2000. Caricature and French Political Culture 1830–1848. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Le Men, Ségolène. 2016. “The Musée de la caricature.” In The Efflorescence of Caricature, 1759–1838, edited by Todd Porterfield, 175–93. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mainardi, Patricia. 2017. Another World: Nineteenth-Century Illustrated Print Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McLees, Ainslie Armstrong. 1984. “Baudelaire and Caricature: Argot plastique.” Symposium 38.3: 221–33.Google Scholar
Patten, Robert L. 2016. “Signifying Shape in Pan-European Caricature.” In The Efflorescence of Caricature, 1759–1838, edited by Todd Porterfield, 137–57. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Porterfield, Todd, ed. 2016. The Efflorescence of Caricature, 1759–1838. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rivers, Christopher Whalen. 1994. Face Value: Physiognomical Thought in Marivaux, Lavater, Balzac, Gautier, and Zola. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, David Francis. 2018. The Politics of Parody: A Literary History of Caricature, 1760–1830. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tytler, Graeme. 1982. Physiognomy in the European Novel: Faces and Fortunes. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, Judith. 1982. A Human Comedy: Physiognomy and Caricature in 19th Century Paris. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Woolf, Reva. 2016. “John Bull, Liberty and Wit: How England Became Caricature.” In The Efflorescence of Caricature, 1759–1838, edited by Todd Porterfield, 49–60. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hutson, James, Jason Lively, Bryan Robertson, Peter Cotroneo & Martin Lang
2024. Painting by Numbers: A Brief History of Art and Technology. In Creative Convergence [Springer Series on Cultural Computing, ], ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.